scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Timothy Evans published in 2008"


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, Rana X. Adhikari1, Juri Agresti1  +449 moreInstitutions (47)
TL;DR: In this article, an all-sky search with the LIGO detectors for periodic gravitational waves in the frequency range 50-1000 Hz and with the frequency's time derivative in the range −1×10^(−8)
Abstract: We report on an all-sky search with the LIGO detectors for periodic gravitational waves in the frequency range 50–1000 Hz and with the frequency’s time derivative in the range −1×10^(−8) Hz s^(−1) to zero. Data from the fourth LIGO science run (S4) have been used in this search. Three different semicoherent methods of transforming and summing strain power from short Fourier transforms (SFTs) of the calibrated data have been used. The first, known as StackSlide, averages normalized power from each SFT. A “weighted Hough” scheme is also developed and used, which also allows for a multi-interferometer search. The third method, known as PowerFlux, is a variant of the StackSlide method in which the power is weighted before summing. In both the weighted Hough and PowerFlux methods, the weights are chosen according to the noise and detector antenna-pattern to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio. The respective advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed. Observing no evidence of periodic gravitational radiation, we report upper limits; we interpret these as limits on this radiation from isolated rotating neutron stars. The best population-based upper limit with 95% confidence on the gravitational-wave strain amplitude, found for simulated sources distributed isotropically across the sky and with isotropically distributed spin axes, is 4.28×10^(−24) (near 140 Hz). Strict upper limits are also obtained for small patches on the sky for best-case and worst-case inclinations of the spin axes.

134 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, Rana X. Adhikari1, P. Ajith2  +450 moreInstitutions (50)
TL;DR: In this article, a LIGO search for short-duration gravitational waves (GWs) associated with soft gamma ray repeater (SGR) bursts is presented, which is the first search sensitive to neutron star f modes, usually considered the most efficient GW emitting modes.
Abstract: We present a LIGO search for short-duration gravitational waves (GWs) associated with soft gamma ray repeater (SGR) bursts. This is the first search sensitive to neutron star f modes, usually considered the most efficient GW emitting modes. We find no evidence of GWs associated with any SGR burst in a sample consisting of the 27 Dec. 2004 giant flare from SGR 1806-20 and 190 lesser events from SGR 1806-20 and SGR 1900+14. The unprecedented sensitivity of the detectors allows us to set the most stringent limits on transient GW amplitudes published to date. We find upper limit estimates on the model-dependent isotropic GW emission energies (at a nominal distance of 10 kpc) between 3×1045 and 9×1052 erg depending on waveform type, detector antenna factors and noise characteristics at the time of the burst. These upper limits are within the theoretically predicted range of some SGR models.

96 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, Rana X. Adhikari1, Juri Agresti1  +482 moreInstitutions (50)
TL;DR: In this paper, a search for short-duration gravitational-wave bursts associated with 39 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by LIGO's S2, S3, and S4 science runs is presented.
Abstract: We present the results of a search for short-duration gravitational-wave bursts associated with 39 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by gamma-ray satellite experiments during LIGO’s S2, S3, and S4 science runs. The search involves calculating the crosscorrelation between two interferometer data streams surrounding the GRB trigger time. We search for associated gravitational radiation from single GRBs, and also apply statistical tests to search for a gravitational-wave signature associated with the whole sample. For the sample examined, we find no evidence for the association of gravitational radiation with GRBs, either on a single-GRB basis or on a statistical basis. Simulating gravitational-wave bursts with sine-Gaussian waveforms, we set upper limits on the root-sum-square of the gravitational-wave strain amplitude of such waveforms at the times of the GRB triggers. We also demonstrate how a sample of several GRBs can be used collectively to set constraints on population models. The small number of GRBs and the significant change in sensitivity of the detectors over the three runs, however, limits the usefulness of a population study for the S2, S3, and S4 runs. Finally, we discuss prospects for the search sensitivity for the ongoing S5 run, and beyond for the next generation of detectors.

91 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, Rana X. Adhikari1, P. Ajith2  +593 moreInstitutions (63)
TL;DR: A broad review of LIGO's astrophysically triggered searches and the sources they target can be found in this article, where the expected frequency range, source energetics, directional and progenitor information are also available.
Abstract: In gravitational-wave detection, special emphasis is put onto searches that focus on cosmic events detected by other types of astrophysical observatories. The astrophysical triggers, e.g. from γ-ray and x-ray satellites, optical telescopes and neutrino observatories, provide a trigger time for analyzing gravitational-wave data coincident with the event. In certain cases the expected frequency range, source energetics, directional and progenitor information are also available. Beyond allowing the recognition of gravitational waveforms with amplitudes closer to the noise floor of the detector, these triggered searches should also lead to rich science results even before the onset of Advanced LIGO. In this paper we provide a broad review of LIGO's astrophysically triggered searches and the sources they target.

37 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, Rana X. Adhikari1, P. Ajith2  +453 moreInstitutions (50)
TL;DR: In this article, the results of the first joint search for gravitational-wave bursts by the LIGO and GEO 600 detectors were presented and compared with the coherent Waveburst pipeline based on the maximum likelihood statistic.
Abstract: We present the results of the first joint search for gravitational-wave bursts by the LIGO and GEO 600 detectors. We search for bursts with characteristic central frequencies in the band 768-2048 Hz in the data acquired between 22 February and 23 March, 2005 (fourth LSC Science Run-S4). We discuss the inclusion of the GEO 600 data in the Waveburst-CorrPower pipeline that first searches for coincident excess power events without taking into account differences in the antenna responses or strain sensitivities of the various detectors. We compare the performance of this pipeline to that of the coherent Waveburst pipeline based on the maximum likelihood statistic. This likelihood statistic is derived from a coherent sum of the detector data streams that takes into account the antenna patterns and sensitivities of the different detectors in the network. We find that the coherent Waveburst pipeline is sensitive to signals of amplitude 30-50% smaller than the Waveburst-CorrPower pipeline. We perform a search for gravitational-wave bursts using both pipelines and find no detection candidates in the S4 data set when all four instruments were operating stably.

24 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
L. Baggio1, M. Bignotto2, Michele Bonaldi3, Massimo Cerdonio2  +481 moreInstitutions (52)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a coincident gravitational wave burst search, where data from the LIGO interferometers are cross-correlated at the time of AURIGA candidate events to identify coincident transients.
Abstract: The first simultaneous operation of the AURIGA detector* and the LIGO observatory* was an opportunity to explore real data, joint analysis methods between two very different types of gravitational wave detectors: resonant bars and interferometers. This paper describes a coincident gravitational wave burst search, where data from the LIGO interferometers are cross-correlated at the time of AURIGA candidate events to identify coincident transients. The analysis pipeline is tuned with two thresholds, on the signal-to-noise ratio of AURIGA candidate events and on the significance of the cross-correlation test in LIGO. The false alarm rate is estimated by introducing time shifts between data sets and the network detection efficiency is measured by adding simulated gravitational wave signals to the detector output. The simulated waveforms have a significant fraction of power in the narrower AURIGA band. In the absence of a detection, we discuss how to set an upper limit on the rate of gravitational waves and to interpret it according to different source models. Due to the short amount of analyzed data and to the high rate of non-Gaussian transients in the detectors' noise at the time, the relevance of this study is methodological: this was the first joint search for gravitational wave bursts among detectors with such different spectral sensitivity and the first opportunity for the resonant and interferometric communities to unify languages and techniques in the pursuit of their common goal.

24 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a formatting error in the fifty-first affiliation in the author list has been identified; the affiliation should read as ‘‘University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Abstract: This paper was published online on 3 August 2007 with a formatting error in the fifty-first affiliation in the author list.The affiliation should read as ‘‘University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.’’ The affiliation has beencorrected as of 4 March 2008. The affiliation is incorrect in the printed version of the journal.

16 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, Rana X. Adhikari, Juri Agresti  +439 moreInstitutions (1)
TL;DR: In this paper, a formatting error in the fiftieth affiliation in the author list has been identified, and the affiliation has beencorrected as of 4 March 2008 by the University of Western Australia.
Abstract: This paper was published online on 29 October 2007 with a formatting error in the fiftieth affiliation in the author list.The affiliation should read as ‘‘University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.’’ The affiliation has beencorrected as of 4 March 2008. The affiliation is incorrect in the printed version of the journal.

11 citations