scispace - formally typeset
W

Walter W. Powell

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  122
Citations -  88810

Walter W. Powell is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: New institutionalism & Organizational analysis. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 120 publications receiving 82637 citations. Previous affiliations of Walter W. Powell include University of Michigan & University of Arizona.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms

TL;DR: Analysis of rich archival data using hierarchical cluster analysis reveals four organizational variants of the dedicated biotech firm (DBF), three of which were products of reconfiguration, as executives from Big Pharma used past practices to incorporate new science.
Journal Article

A gaiola de ferro revisitada: isomorfismo institucional e racionalidade coletiva nos campos organizacionais

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them, and describe three isomorphic processes - coercive, mimetic, and normative - leading to this outcome.
Posted Content

Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine eleven regions in the U.S. that were rich in resources - ideas, money, and skills - that could have lead to the formation of life science clusters.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Frontiers of Intellectual Property: Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open Science

TL;DR: The growing salience of intellectual property (IP) rights has reconfigured U.S. science, shifting it from the formerly separate realms of university and commercial science to an increasingly interconnected field of public and proprietary science as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Networks, Fields and Organizations: Micro-Dynamics, Scale and Cohesive Embeddings

TL;DR: Analysis of cases suggests that different structures of cohesive subsets and overlaps may be predictive in organizational contexts and similarly for the larger fields in which they are embedded, and develops a vocabulary that relates different forms of network cohesion to field properties as opposed to organizational constraints on ties and structures.