X
Xiangfeng Chen
Researcher at Dalian University of Technology
Publications - 5
Citations - 54
Xiangfeng Chen is an academic researcher from Dalian University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Overpressure & Dust explosion. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 5 publications receiving 3 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Investigations on unconfined large-scale methane explosion with the effects of scale and obstacles
TL;DR: In this article, the authors performed unconfined explosion experiments under different methane concentrations at 27 m3 scale with internal and external obstacles and found that the flame buoyant effect was more obvious for the rich-fuel flame due to the excess methane accumulation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Characteristic evaluation of aluminum dust explosion venting with high static activation pressure
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted aluminum dust explosion venting experiments with static activation pressure ranging from 70 kPa to 280 kPa in the 20 L spherical chamber with venting diameters from 20 mm to 125 mm.
Journal ArticleDOI
Experimental investigation on PMMA dust explosion venting at elevated static activation pressure
TL;DR: In this paper, a 20-L spherical chamber with a venting diameter of 80 mm was used to study the development mechanism of external flame and the comparison results with two standards were analyzed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Lower flammability limits of ethanol, acetone and ethyl acetate vapor mixtures in air
Kai Zhang,Harrison Akins,Wei Gao,Yanchao Li,Zongling Zhang,Sheng Shang,Changshuai Zhang,Xiangfeng Chen,Kai Sun +8 more
TL;DR: In this article, the lower flammability limits (LFLs) of ethanol, acetone, and ethyl acetate vapor mixtures in air with various mole fractions were investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI
A new prediction method for dust explosion venting at high static activation pressures
TL;DR: In this article, a new method is proposed for predicting pressures based on an analysis of energy losses at high activation pressures and verified by aluminum dust explosion experiments, which is more accurate than the NFPA68 standard, which fails to consider the thermal energy loss.