scispace - formally typeset
X

Xiangfeng Chen

Researcher at Dalian University of Technology

Publications -  5
Citations -  54

Xiangfeng Chen is an academic researcher from Dalian University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Overpressure & Dust explosion. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 5 publications receiving 3 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigations on unconfined large-scale methane explosion with the effects of scale and obstacles

TL;DR: In this article, the authors performed unconfined explosion experiments under different methane concentrations at 27 m3 scale with internal and external obstacles and found that the flame buoyant effect was more obvious for the rich-fuel flame due to the excess methane accumulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Characteristic evaluation of aluminum dust explosion venting with high static activation pressure

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted aluminum dust explosion venting experiments with static activation pressure ranging from 70 kPa to 280 kPa in the 20 L spherical chamber with venting diameters from 20 mm to 125 mm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental investigation on PMMA dust explosion venting at elevated static activation pressure

TL;DR: In this paper, a 20-L spherical chamber with a venting diameter of 80 mm was used to study the development mechanism of external flame and the comparison results with two standards were analyzed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lower flammability limits of ethanol, acetone and ethyl acetate vapor mixtures in air

TL;DR: In this article, the lower flammability limits (LFLs) of ethanol, acetone, and ethyl acetate vapor mixtures in air with various mole fractions were investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new prediction method for dust explosion venting at high static activation pressures

TL;DR: In this article, a new method is proposed for predicting pressures based on an analysis of energy losses at high activation pressures and verified by aluminum dust explosion experiments, which is more accurate than the NFPA68 standard, which fails to consider the thermal energy loss.