In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes.

For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy.

Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-use-and-interpretation-of-assays-for-ijf2t30pbq.pdf

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field.

https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8555786/file/8555788.pdf

Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.

In 2009, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) proposed a set of recommendations for the definition of distinct cell death morphologies and for the appropriate use of cell death-related terminology, including 'apoptosis', 'necrosis' and 'mitotic catastrophe'. In view of the substantial progress in the biochemical and genetic exploration of cell death, time has come to switch from morphological to molecular definitions of cell death modalities. Here we propose a functional classification of cell death subroutines that applies to both in vitro and in vivo settings and includes extrinsic apoptosis, caspase-dependent or -independent intrinsic apoptosis, regulated necrosis, autophagic cell death and mitotic catastrophe. Moreover, we discuss the utility of expressions indicating additional cell death modalities. On the basis of the new, revised NCCD classification, cell death subroutines are defined by a series of precise, measurable biochemical features.

/pdf/molecular-definitions-of-cell-death-subroutines-q5g428rlyi.pdf

Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2012

Autophagy is a mechanism by which cellular material is delivered to lysosomes for degradation, leading to the basal turnover of cell components and providing energy and macromolecular precursors. Autophagy has opposing, context-dependent roles in cancer, and interventions to both stimulate and inhibit autophagy have been proposed as cancer therapies. This has led to the therapeutic targeting of autophagy in cancer to be sometimes viewed as controversial. In this Review, we suggest a way forwards for the effective targeting of autophagy by understanding the context-dependent roles of autophagy and by capitalizing on modern approaches to clinical trial design.

/pdf/targeting-autophagy-in-cancer-2pjcn0h04a.pdf

Targeting autophagy in cancer

Macroautophagy/autophagy is a conserved transport pathway where targeted structures are sequestered by phagophores, which mature into autophagosomes, and then delivered into lysosomes for degradati...

/pdf/chloroquine-inhibits-autophagic-flux-by-decreasing-29tresuftu.pdf

Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion.

Macroautophagy/autophagy is a highly conserved eukaryotic molecular process that facilitates the recycling of superfluous cytoplasmic materials, damaged organelles, and invading pathogens, resulting in proper cellular homeostasis and survival during stress conditions. Autophagy is stringently regulated at multiple stages, including control at transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational levels. In this work, we identified a mechanism by which regulation of autophagy is achieved through the posttranslational modification of Atg9. Here, we show that, in order to limit autophagy to a low, basal level during normal conditions, Atg9 is ubiquitinated and subsequently targeted for degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner through the action of the E3 ligase Met30. When cells require increased autophagy flux to respond to nutrient deprivation, the proteolysis of Atg9 is significantly reduced. Overall, this work reveals an additional layer of mechanistic regulation that allows cells to further maintain appropriate levels of autophagy and to rapidly induce this process in response to stress.

Downregulation of autophagy by Met30-mediated Atg9 ubiquitination.

Damaged or aggregated proteins and organelles accumulate with age and contribute to various age-related pathologies including Alzheimer, Parkinson or Huntington diseases. In eukaryotic cells, there are 2 major pathways for degradation of the cytoplasm: The ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) and macroautophagy/autophagy. Both pathways can share the characteristic of initiating the process by ubiquitination of the substrate, but they utilize different ubiquitin receptors. In a paper described in a punctum in this issue, Lu et al. used the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to demonstrate that the decision to use a particular pathway is made through a mechanism that depends on the receptors rather than the specific type of substrate ubiquitination.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15548627.2017.1356553

Receptors make the pathway choice for protein degradation

The molecular mechanism of macroautophagy/autophagy induction has been intensively studied, but little is known about downregulation of autophagy and how this process is restricted. In particular, how is autophagy maintained at an appropriate homeostatic level when cells are subjected to prolonged stress? In this study (see the related punctum in Autophagy 12-5), Liu et al. report a function of the CUL3-KLHL20 ubiquitin ligase in feedback regulation, leading to the downregulation of autophagy through the degradation of the ULK1 and PIK3C3/VPS34 complexes.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15548627.2016.1173802

Downregulation of autophagy through CUL3-KLHL20-mediated turnover of the ULK1 and PIK3C3/VPS34 complexes.

Abstract Diabetic kidney dysfunction is closely associated with renal fibrosis. Although the suppression of fibrosis is crucial to attenuate kidney damage, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, renal injury in diabetic mice was induced by the intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (100 or 150 mg/kg) for 2 consecutive days. In the model mice, remarkable renal injury was observed, manifested by albuminuria, swelling of kidneys, and histopathological characteristics. The renal fibrosis was obviously displayed with high-intensity staining of fibrin, type IV collagen (Col IV), and fibronectin. The levels of Col IV and transforming growth factor-β1 were significantly increased in diabetic mice kidneys. The aggravated fibrotic process was associated with the overexpression of HMGB1, TLR2/4, and p-NF-κB. Furthermore, a high expression of F4/80 and CD14 indicated that macrophage infiltration was involved in perpetuating inflammation and subsequent fibrosis in the kidneys of diabetic mice. The results demonstrate that the severity of renal fibrosis is positively associated with the activation of HMGB1/TLR2/4 signaling in diabetes.

/pdf/aggravated-renal-fibrosis-is-positively-associated-with-the-6glp3k26.pdf

Yuchen Feng

Papers

Downregulation of autophagy by Met30-mediated Atg9 ubiquitination.

Receptors make the pathway choice for protein degradation

Downregulation of autophagy through CUL3-KLHL20-mediated turnover of the ULK1 and PIK3C3/VPS34 complexes.

Aggravated renal fibrosis is positively associated with the activation of HMGB1-TLR2/4 signaling in STZ-induced diabetic mice