Institution
Bridgewater State University
Education•Bridgewater, Massachusetts, United States•
About: Bridgewater State University is a education organization based out in Bridgewater, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 625 authors who have published 1223 publications receiving 21820 citations. The organization is also known as: BSU & Bridgewater State.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Politics, Mental health, Domestic violence
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The experiments show that terminals with round synaptic vesicles are excitatory and that Terminals with elongate synaptic vESicles are inhibitory, and that Replenishment of synapticvesicles appears to require metabolic energy.
Abstract: Stimulation of the excitatory axon of the opener muscle of the crayfish in the presence of the metabolic inhibitor 2,4-dinitrophenol leads to depletion of synaptic vesicles in nerve terminals containing round vesicles. Stimulation of the inhibitory axon under these conditions produces depletion of vesicles in other nerve terminals containing more elongate synaptic vesicles. The experiments show that terminals with round synaptic vesicles are excitatory and that terminals with elongate synaptic vesicles are inhibitory. Replenishment of synaptic vesicles appears to require metabolic energy.
134 citations
••
TL;DR: Simple environmental manipulations, such as contrast enhancement, can significantly increase food and liquid intake in frail demented patients with AD.
134 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors found that academically entitled students (i.e., those who feel deserving of success in college regardless of effort/performance) had stronger expectations that a female (versus male) professor would grant their special favor requests.
Abstract: Although the number of U.S. female professors has risen steadily in recent years, female professors are still subject to different student expectations and treatment. Students continue to perceive and expect female professors to be more nurturing than male professors are. We examined whether students may consequently request more special favors from female professors. In a survey of professors (n = 88) across the United States, Study 1 found that female (versus male) professors reported getting more requests for standard work demands, special favors, and friendship behaviors, with the latter two mediating the professor gender effect on professors’ self-reported emotional labor. Study 2 utilized an experimental design using a fictitious female or male professor, with college student participants (n = 121) responding to a scenario in which a special favor request might be made of the professor. The results indicated that academically entitled students (i.e., those who feel deserving of success in college regardless of effort/performance) had stronger expectations that a female (versus male) professor would grant their special favor requests. Those expectations consequently increased students’ likelihood of making the requests and of exhibiting negative emotional and behavioral reactions to having those requests denied. This work highlights the extra burdens felt by female professors. We discuss possible moderators of these effects as well as the importance of developing strategies for preventing them.
133 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used statistical analysis to show that a dictator's reliance on co-optation fundamentally alters how repression is used, and they found that the use of political parties and a legislature creates incentives that lead dictators to decrease empowerment rights restrictions, like censorship, while increasing physical integrity rights violations, like torture and political imprisonment.
Abstract: A dictator’s motivation for using repression is fairly clear, but why some repress more than others or favor particular types of repressive strategies is less obvious. Using statistical analysis, this article demonstrates that a dictator’s reliance on co-optation fundamentally alters how repression is used. Specifically, it finds that co-optation through the use of political parties and a legislature creates incentives that lead dictators to decrease empowerment rights restrictions, like censorship, while increasing physical integrity rights violations, like torture and political imprisonment. This occurs because, by creating parties and a legislature, a dictator draws his potential opposition out of the general public and into state institutions, making it easier to identify who these opponents are, to monitor their activities, and to gauge the extent of their popular support. This reduces the need to impose broad types of repressive measures, like empowerment rights restrictions, that breed discontent w...
129 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the various sources of prevalence rates of intimate partner violence by women against men, the dominant theoretical explanation for IPV in general, and its implications for female perpetrators and male victims in the social service and criminal justice systems, as well as current evidence of the consequences of women's use of IPV to the men who sustain it.
Abstract: Evidence showing that women use intimate partner violence (IPV) against their male partners has existed since the 1970s when IPV was first systematically examined This article discusses the various sources of prevalence rates of IPV by women against men, the dominant theoretical explanation for IPV in general, and its implications for female perpetrators and male victims in the social service and criminal justice systems, as well as the current evidence of the consequences of women's use of IPV to the men who sustain it Finally, we discuss directions for future research, including our own study focusing on men who sustain IPV
127 citations
Authors
Showing all 648 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Harrison G. Pope | 107 | 393 | 42206 |
Paul G. Nestor | 57 | 166 | 11434 |
Gen Kanayama | 38 | 67 | 4595 |
Michael L. Jones | 38 | 126 | 3831 |
Roberta F. Colman | 36 | 215 | 5012 |
Mei-Ling Ting Lee | 33 | 113 | 6908 |
Emily M. Douglas | 22 | 81 | 2317 |
R. E. Pitt | 21 | 38 | 1861 |
Teresa K. King | 20 | 30 | 1886 |
D. Steven White | 20 | 61 | 1419 |
Saritha Nellutla | 19 | 37 | 1688 |
Emily Walsh | 18 | 46 | 1722 |
Erica Frantz | 17 | 48 | 1642 |
Lindsay M. Fallon | 16 | 44 | 928 |
Christopher L. Higgins | 16 | 26 | 964 |