scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

J.P. Morgan & Co.

About: J.P. Morgan & Co. is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Portfolio & Implied volatility. The organization has 328 authors who have published 436 publications receiving 14291 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Dan Pirjol1
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the appearance of explosions in three quantities in interest rate models with log-normally distributed rates in discrete time and derive exact upper and lower bounds on the prices and on the standard deviation of the Monte Carlo pricing of Eurodollar futures in the one factor log-normal Libor market model.
Abstract: We demonstrate the appearance of explosions in three quantities in interest rate models with log-normally distributed rates in discrete time. (1) The expectation of the money market account in the Black, Derman, Toy model, (2) the prices of Eurodollar futures contracts in a model with log-normally distributed rates in the terminal measure and (3) the prices of Eurodollar futures contracts in the one-factor log-normal Libor market model (LMM). We derive exact upper and lower bounds on the prices and on the standard deviation of the Monte Carlo pricing of Eurodollar futures in the one factor log-normal Libor market model. These bounds explode at a non-zero value of volatility, and thus imply a limitation on the applicability of the LMM and on its Monte Carlo simulation to sufficiently low volatilities.

5 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present rules as to who can take credit decisions, and specify levels of authority; numbers needed to make the decision; whether authority is cumulative, pooled or individual; how authority relates to the transaction or total exposure; and any special requirements for specific types of credit exposure.
Abstract: All banks have rules as to who can take credit decisions. They should be clear and specify levels of authority; numbers needed to make the decision; whether authority is cumulative, pooled or individual; whether authority relates to the transaction or total exposure, and any special requirements for specific types of credit exposure. Some banks use a separate structure for counterparty — or Treasury or investment banking — credit; this chapter will deal mainly with plain lending authority, with specialised requirements for counterparty or products covered in Chapter 6.

5 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper proposed analytical approximations for the sensitivities (Greeks) of the Asian options in the Black-Scholes model, following from a small maturity/volatility approximation for the option prices w...
Abstract: We propose analytical approximations for the sensitivities (Greeks) of the Asian options in the Black–Scholes model, following from a small maturity/volatility approximation for the option prices w...

5 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2019
TL;DR: A novel neural network model for semantic relation classification called joint self-attention biLSTM (SA-Bi-L STM) is proposed to model the internal structure of the sentence to obtain the importance of each word of the sentences without relying on additional information, and capture Long-distance dependence on semantics.
Abstract: Relation extraction is an important task in NLP community. However, some models often fail in capturing Long-distance dependence on semantics, and the interaction between semantics of two entities is ignored. In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model for semantic relation classification called joint self-attention biLSTM (SA-Bi-LSTM) to model the internal structure of the sentence to obtain the importance of each word of the sentence without relying on additional information, and capture Long-distance dependence on semantics. We conduct experiments using the SemEval-2010 Task 8 dataset. Extensive experiments and the results demonstrated that the proposed method is effective against relation classification, which can obtain state-ofthe-art classification accuracy just with minimal feature engineering.

5 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
15 Oct 2020
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a two-step method to explain clusters, where a classifier is first trained to predict the clusters labels, then the Single Feature Introduction Test (SFTT) method is run on the model to identify the statistically significant features that characterize each cluster.
Abstract: Many applications from the financial industry successfully leverage clustering algorithms to reveal meaningful patterns among a vast amount of unstructured financial data. However, these algorithms suffer from a lack of interpretability that is required both at a business and regulatory level. In order to overcome this issue, we propose a novel two-steps method to explain clusters. A classifier is first trained to predict the clusters labels, then the Single Feature Introduction Test (SFTT) method is run on the model to identify the statistically significant features that characterize each cluster. We describe a real wealth management compliance use-case that highlights the necessity of such an interpretable clustering method. We illustrate the performance of the method using simulated data and through an experiment on financial ratios of U.S. companies.

5 citations


Authors

Showing all 328 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Manuela Veloso7172027543
Tucker Balch4118110577
George Deodatis361255798
Mustafa Caglayan321444027
Henrique Andrade27813387
Daniel Borrajo261682619
Haibin Zhu25434945
Paolo Pasquariello24532409
Andrew M. Abrahams21371130
Alan Nicholson19901478
Samuel Assefa19342112
Joshua D. Younger17182305
Espen Gaarder Haug171431653
Jeffrey S. Saltz1657852
Guy Coughlan15272729
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Federal Reserve System
10.3K papers, 511.9K citations

81% related

Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2.6K papers, 156.1K citations

80% related

Max M. Fisher College of Business
1.3K papers, 147.4K citations

80% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

79% related

INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

79% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
202123
202050
201920
20188
201712