scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division

FacilityOrlando, Florida, United States
About: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division is a facility organization based out in Orlando, Florida, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Teamwork & Usability. The organization has 122 authors who have published 210 publications receiving 10656 citations. The organization is also known as: NAWCTSD.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An input-processoutput model of instructional games and learning is presented that elaborates the key features of games that are of interest from an instructional perspective; the game cycle of user judgments, behavior, and feedback that is a hallmark of engagement in game play; and the types of learning outcomes that can be achieved.
Abstract: Although most agree that games can be engaging and that games can be instructive, there is little consensus regarding the essential characteristics of instructional games. Implicit in the research literature is the notion that if we pair instructional content with certain game features, we can harness the power of games to engage users and achieve desired instructional goals. In this article, the authors present an input-process- output model of instructional games and learning that elaborates (a) the key features of games that are of interest from an instructional perspective; (b) the game cycle of user judgments, behavior, and feedback that is a hallmark of engagement in game play; and (c) the types of learning outcomes that can be achieved. The authors discuss the implications of this approach for the design and implementation of effective instruc- tional games.

2,794 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight several fundamental questions that remain regarding shared cognition: (1) What must be shared? (2) What does shared mean? (3) How should "shared" be measured? and (4) What outcomes do we expect shared cognition to affect?
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to highlight several fundamental questions that remain regarding shared cognition: (1) What must be ‘shared’? (2) What does ‘shared’ mean? (3) How should ‘shared’ be measured? and (4) What outcomes do we expect shared cognition to affect? A general and integrative description of these questions is provided. In addition, the value of shared cognition is discussed along with recommendations for future research. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

836 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results indicated that effective planning increased the SMM among team members, allowed them to utilize efficient communication strategies during high-workload conditions, and resulted in improved coordinated team performance.
Abstract: Critical decisions are made every day by teams of individuals who must coordinate their activities to achieve effectiveness. Researchers recently suggested that a shared mental model (SMM) among te...

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Characteristics of team situation awareness are delineated and implications are discussed and research questions are outlined that target the measurement and training of situation awareness in teams.
Abstract: Situation awareness has long been recognized as an important variable in aviation performance. Research to date has focused on identifying characteristics of situation awareness for individuals, not on the behaviors and processes associated with team situation awareness. The purpose of this review is to delineate and identify characteristics of team situation awareness. In addition, implications are discussed and research questions are outlined that target the measurement and training of situation awareness in teams.

597 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This methodological review paper reviews recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge, and presents empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method.
Abstract: Multioperator tasks often require complex cognitive processing at the team level. Many team cognitive processes, such as situation assessment and coordination, are thought to rely on team knowledge. Team knowledge is multifaceted and comprises relatively generic knowledge in the form of team mental models and more specific team situation models. In this methodological review paper, we review recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge. Team knowledge features include type, homogeneity versus heterogeneity, and rate of knowledge change. Measurement features include knowledge elicitation method, team metric, and aggregation method. When available, we highlight analytical conclusions or empirical data that support a connection between team knowledge and measurement method. In addition, we present empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method and identify research and methodological needs. Addressing issues surrounding the measurement of team knowledge is a prerequisite to understanding team cognition and its relation to team performance and to designing training programs or devices to facilitate team cognition.

580 citations


Authors
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Mitre Corporation
6K papers, 124.8K citations

74% related

German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
3.9K papers, 75.2K citations

74% related

Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya
2.7K papers, 67.3K citations

73% related

BBN Technologies
3.1K papers, 158.5K citations

73% related

IT University of Copenhagen
2.9K papers, 73.7K citations

72% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
202110
20206
201910
20188
20177