Institution
Society of General Internal Medicine
Nonprofit•Alexandria, Virginia, United States•
About: Society of General Internal Medicine is a nonprofit organization based out in Alexandria, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Health care & Job satisfaction. The organization has 29 authors who have published 23 publications receiving 1561 citations. The organization is also known as: The Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine & SGIM.
Topics: Health care, Job satisfaction, Specialty, Cancer, Job attitude
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Physician job satisfaction is a complex phenomenon that can be measured using the Physician Worklife Survey and results supported face, content, convergent, and discriminant validity of the measures.
Abstract: Background.Physician job satisfaction has been linked to various patient care and health system outcomes. A survey instrument that concisely measures physicians' satisfaction with various job facets can help diverse stakeholders to better understand and manage these outcomes.Objective.To document th
258 citations
••
TL;DR: A comprehensive approach to assessing physician job satisfaction yielded 10 facets, some of which had not been previously identified, and generated a matching pool of items for subsequent use in field tests.
Abstract: Background. Changes in the demographic, specialty, and employment sector composition of medicine have altered physicians' jobs, limiting autonomy and reducing morale. Because physician job satisfaction has been linked to clinical variables, better measurement might help to ameliorate conditions linked to medical disaffection, possibly improving health care. Objective. To document conceptual development, item construction, and use of content experts in designing multidimensional measures of physician job satisfaction and global satisfaction scales for assessing physicians' job perceptions across settings and specialties. Design. Using previous research, physician focus groups, secondary analysis of survey data, interviews with physician informants, and a multispecialty physician expert panel, distinct job facets and statements representing those facets were developed. Results. Facets from previously validated instruments included autonomy, relationships with colleagues, relationships with patients, relationships with staff, pay, resources, and status. New facets included intrinsic satisfaction, free time away from work, administrative support, and community involvement. Physician status items were reconfigured into relationships with peers, patients, staff, and community, yielding 10 hypothetical facets. Global scales and items were developed representing satisfaction with job, career, and specialty. Conclusions. A comprehensive approach to assessing physician job satisfaction yielded 10 facets, some of which had not been previously identified, and generated a matching pool of items for subsequent use in field tests.
212 citations
••
TL;DR: Key themes from the qualitative analysis were short visits, insufficient support staff, a Relative Value Unit mentality, documentation time pressure, and undervaluing education in academic GIM worklife.
Abstract: BACKGROUND
General internal medicine (GIM) careers are increasingly viewed as challenging and unsustainable.
176 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the relationship between prior mammography use, cancer stage at diagnosis, and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer and found that older women who undergo regular mammography are diagnosed with an earlier stage of disease and are less likely to die from their disease.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Women age 65 years and older account for most newly diagnosed breast cancers and deaths from breast cancer. Yet, older women are least likely to undergo mammography, perhaps because mammography's value is less well demonstrated in older women.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between prior mammography use, cancer stage at diagnosis, and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the Linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database.
SETTING: Population-based data from three geographic areas included in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.
PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 67 and older diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer, from 1987 to 1993, residing in Connecticut, metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, or Seattle-Puget Sound, Washington.
MEASUREMENTS: Medicare claims were reviewed and women were classified according to their mammography use during the 2 years before diagnosis: nonusers (no prior mammograms), regular users (at least two mammograms at least 10 months apart), or peri-diagnosis users (only mammogram(s) within 3 months before diagnosis). Mammography utilization was linked with SEER data to determine stage at diagnosis and cause of death. Our main outcome variables were (1) stage at diagnosis, classified as early (in situ/Stage I) or late (Stage II or greater), and (2) breast cancer mortality, measured from diagnosis until death from breast cancer or end of the follow-up period (December 31, 1994).
RESULTS: Older women who were nonusers of mammography were diagnosed with breast cancer at Stage II or greater more often than regular users (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.74–3.58). This association was present within each age group studied. Nonusers of mammography were at significantly greater risk of dying from their breast cancer than regular users for all women (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 3.38; 95% CI, 2.65–4.32) and for women within each age group. Even assuming a lead time of 1.25 years, nonusers of mammography continued to be at increased risk of dying from breast cancer. Our findings remained significant for all women and for the two youngest age groups (67–74 years, 75–85 years), although the benefit was no longer statistically significant for the oldest women (85 years and older).
CONCLUSIONS: Older women who undergo regular mammography are diagnosed with an earlier stage of disease and are less likely to die from their disease. These data support the use of regular mammography in older women and suggest that mammography can reduce breast cancer mortality in older women, even for women age 85 and older.
168 citations
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between prior mammography use, cancer stage at diagnosis, and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer and found that older women who undergo regular mammography are diagnosed with an earlier stage of disease and are less likely to die from their disease.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Women age 65 years and older account for most newly diagnosed breast cancers and deaths from breast cancer. Yet, older women are least likely to undergo mammography, perhaps because mammography's value is less well demonstrated in older women. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between prior mammography use, cancer stage at diagnosis, and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the Linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database. SETTING: Population-based data from three geographic areas included in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 67 and older diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer, from 1987 to 1993, residing in Connecticut, metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, or Seattle-Puget Sound, Washington. MEASUREMENTS: Medicare claims were reviewed and women were classified according to their mammography use during the 2 years before diagnosis: nonusers (no prior mammograms), regular users (at least two mammograms at least 10 months apart), or peri-diagnosis users (only mammogram(s) within 3 months before diagnosis). Mammography utilization was linked with SEER data to determine stage at diagnosis and cause of death. Our main outcome variables were (1) stage at diagnosis, classified as early (in situ/Stage I) or late (Stage II or greater), and (2) breast cancer mortality, measured from diagnosis until death from breast cancer or end of the follow-up period (December 31, 1994). RESULTS: Older women who were nonusers of mammography were diagnosed with breast cancer at Stage II or greater more often than regular users (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.74-3.58). This association was present within each age group studied. Nonusers of mammography were at significantly greater risk of dying from their breast cancer than regular users for all women (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 3.38; 95% CI, 2.65-4.32) and for women within each age group. Even assuming a lead time of 1.25 years, nonusers of mammography continued to be at increased risk of dying from breast cancer. Our findings remained significant for all women and for the two youngest age groups (67-74 years, 75-85 years), although the benefit was no longer statistically significant for the oldest women (85 years and older). CONCLUSIONS: Older women who undergo regular mammography are diagnosed with an earlier stage of disease and are less likely to die from their disease. These data support the use of regular mammography in older women and suggest that mammography can reduce breast cancer mortality in older women, even for women age 85 and older.
157 citations
Authors
Showing all 29 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Gabriel M. Danovitch | 58 | 239 | 10396 |
Harry P. Selker | 55 | 244 | 14412 |
Barbara J. Turner | 53 | 213 | 11669 |
Mark Linzer | 51 | 109 | 13205 |
Robert M. Centor | 42 | 168 | 6905 |
David E. Kern | 39 | 80 | 9812 |
Mark D. Schwartz | 33 | 101 | 5062 |
Martha S. Gerrity | 29 | 58 | 7330 |
Julia E. McMurray | 19 | 23 | 3835 |
L. Randol Barker | 7 | 10 | 989 |
Sandra L. Marwill | 6 | 6 | 809 |
Judy Ann Bigby | 5 | 5 | 649 |
Mark Linzer | 5 | 6 | 483 |
Max Stäubli | 4 | 4 | 42 |
Penelope R. Williamson | 4 | 4 | 48 |