scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1558-9080

Academy of Management Perspectives 

Academy of Management
About: Academy of Management Perspectives is an academic journal published by Academy of Management. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Corporate governance & Strategic planning. It has an ISSN identifier of 1558-9080. Over the lifetime, 1186 publications have been published receiving 113122 citations. The journal is also known as: AMP.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe a trip around the world, where both local management practices and theories are explained from the different contexts and histories of the places visited: Germany, Japan, France, Holland, the countries of the overseas Chinese, South-East Asia, Africa, Russia, and finally mainland China.
Abstract: Executive Overview Management as the word is presently used is an American invention. In other parts of the world not only the practices but the entire concept of management may differ, and the theories needed to understand it, may deviate considerably from what is considered normal and desirable in the USA. The reader is invited on a trip around the world, and both local management practices and theories are explained from the different contexts and histories of the places visited: Germany, Japan, France, Holland, the countries of the overseas Chinese, South-East Asia, Africa, Russia, and finally mainland China. A model in which worldwide differences in national cultures are categorized according to five independent dimensions helps in explaining the differences in management found; although the situation in each country or region has unique characteristics that no model can account for. One practical application of the model is in demonstrating the relative position of the U.S. versus other parts of the...

2,588 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis as discussed by the authors suggests that firms that use their internal strengths in exploiting environmental opportunities and neutralizing environmental threats are more likely to gain competitive advantages than other kinds of firms.
Abstract: Executive Overview Strategic managers and researchers have long been interested in understanding sources of competitive advantage for firms. Traditionally, this effort has focused on the relationship between a firm's environmental opportunities and threats on the one hand, and its internal strengths and weaknesses on the other. Summarized in what has come to be known as SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis, this traditional logic suggests that firms that use their internal strengths in exploiting environmental opportunities and neutralizing environmental threats, while avoiding internal weaknesses, are more likely to gain competitive advantages than other kinds of firms.1 This simple SWOT framework points to the importance of both external and internal phenomena in understanding the sources of competitive advantage. To date, the development of tools for analyzing environmental opportunities and threats has proceeded much more rapidly than the development of tools for analyzing...

1,977 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify four ways in which culture influences the behaviors central to knowledge creation, sharing, and use, and suggest specific actions managers can take to assess the different aspects of culture most likely to influence knowledgerelated behaviors.
Abstract: Executive Overview Organizational culture is increasingly recognized as a major barrier to leveraging intellectual assets. This article identifies four ways in which culture influences the behaviors central to knowledge creation, sharing, and use. First, culture—and particularly subcultures—shape assumptions about what knowledge is and which knowledge is worth managing. Second, culture defines the relationships between individual and organizational knowledge, determining who is expected to control specific knowledge, as well as who must share it and who can hoard it. Third, culture creates the context for social interaction that determines how knowledge will be used in particular situations. Fourth, culture shapes the processes by which new knowledge—with its accompanying uncertainties—is created, legitimated, and distributed in organizations. These four perspectives suggest specific actions managers can take to assess the different aspects of culture most likely to influence knowledge-related behaviors. ...

1,942 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit, to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit—to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies and markets where flexibility, autonomy, and experimentation are needed. In the past 15 years there has been an explosion of interest and research on this topic. We briefly review the current state of the research, highlighting what we know and don't know about the topic. We close with a point of view on promising areas for ongoing research.

1,421 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors systematically analyze the mechanism involved in each of the following channels of potential revenue increase or cost reduction owing to better environmental practices: (a) better access to certain markets; (b) differentiating products; (c) selling pollution-control technology; (d) risk management and relations with external stakeholders; (e) cost of material, energy, and services; (f)cost of cap...
Abstract: Executive Overview The conventional wisdom concerning environmental protection is that it comes at an additional cost imposed on firms, which may erode their global competitiveness. However, during the last decade, this paradigm has been challenged by a number of analysts (e.g., Porter & van der Linde, 1995), who have argued basically that improving a company' environmental performance can lead to better economic or financial performance, and not necessarily to an increase in cost. The aim of this paper is to review empirical evidence of improvement in both environmental and economic or financial performance. We systematically analyze the mechanism involved in each of the following channels of potential revenue increase or cost reduction owing to better environmental practices: (a) better access to certain markets; (b) differentiating products; (c) selling pollution-control technology; (d) risk management and relations with external stakeholders; (e) cost of material, energy, and services; (f) cost of cap...

1,409 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202317
202237
202140
202039
201926
201818