scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Oncologist in 2004"


Journal ArticleDOI
Peter Vaupel1
TL;DR: Emerging evidence indicates that the effect of Hypoxia on malignant progression is mediated by a series of hypoxia-induced proteomic and genomic changes activating angiogenesis, anaerobic metabolism, and other processes that enable tumor cells to survive or escape their oxygen-deficient environment.
Abstract: Hypoxia is a common characteristic of locally advanced solid tumors that has been associated with diminished therapeutic response and, more recently, with malignant progression, that is, an increasing probability of recurrence, locoregional spread, and distant metastasis. Emerging evidence indicates that the effect of hypoxia on malignant progression is mediated by a series of hypoxia-induced proteomic and genomic changes activating angiogenesis, anaerobic metabolism, and other processes that enable tumor cells to survive or escape their oxygen-deficient environment. The transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a major regulator of tumor cell adaptation to hypoxic stress. Tumor cells with proteomic and genomic changes favoring survival under hypoxic conditions will proliferate, thereby further aggravating the hypoxia. The selection and expansion of new (and more aggressive) clones, which eventually become the dominant tumor cell type, lead to the establishment of a vicious circle of hypoxia and malignant progression.

786 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The pattern of malignant progression, coupled with the demonstration of a relationship between falling hemoglobin level and worsening tumor oxygenation, highlights the need for effective treatment of anemia as one approach for correcting anemic hypoxia in tumors and in so doing, possibly improving therapeutic response.
Abstract: Hypoxia is a characteristic feature of locally advanced solid tumors resulting from an imbalance between oxygen (O2) supply and consumption. Major causative factors of tumor hypoxia are abnormal structure and function of the microvessels supplying the tumor, increased diffusion distances between the nutritive blood vessels and the tumor cells, and reduced O2 transport capacity of the blood due to the presence of disease- or treatment-related anemia. Tumor hypoxia is a therapeutic concern since it can reduce the effectiveness of radiotherapy, some O2-dependent cytotoxic agents, and photodynamic therapy. Tumor hypoxia can also negatively impact therapeutic outcome by inducing changes in the proteome and genome of neoplastic cells that further survival and malignant progression by enabling the cells to overcome nutritive deprivation or to escape their hostile environment. The selection and clonal expansion of these favorably altered cells further aggravate tumor hypoxia and support a vicious circle of increasing hypoxia and malignant progression while concurrently promoting the development of more treatmentresistant disease. This pattern of malignant progression, coupled with the demonstration of a relationship between falling hemoglobin level and worsening tumor oxygenation, highlights the need for effective treatment of anemia as one approach for correcting anemic hypoxia in tumors, and in so doing, possibly improving therapeutic response. The Oncologist 2004;9(suppl 5):4-9

693 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors review the state of the art management for patients with osteosarcoma in North America and Europe including the use of limb-salvage procedures and reconstruction as well as discuss the etiologic and biologic factors associated with tumor development.
Abstract: Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents. Survival for these patients was poor with the use of surgery and/or radiotherapy. The introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy dramatically improved the outcome for these patients and the majority of modern series report 3-year disease-free survival of 60%-70%. This paper describes current strategies for treating patients with osteosarcoma as well as review of the clinical features, radiologic and diagnostic work-up, and pathology. The authors review the state of the art management for patients with osteosarcoma in North America and Europe including the use of limb-salvage procedures and reconstruction as well as discuss the etiologic and biologic factors associated with tumor development. Therapy-related sequelae and future directions in the biology and therapy for these patients are also discussed.

631 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of adjuvant systemic therapy is to eradicate distant micrometastatic deposits, and it is essential to be able to estimate an individual patient's risk of harboring clinically silent micromETastatic disease using established prognostic factors.
Abstract: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among American women. Due to increased screening, the majority of patients present with early-stage breast cancer. The Oxford Overview Analysis demonstrates that adjuvant hormonal therapy and polychemotherapy reduce the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer. Adjuvant systemic therapy, however, has associated risks and it would be useful to be able to optimally select patients most likely to benefit. The purpose of adjuvant systemic therapy is to eradicate distant micrometastatic deposits. It is essential therefore to be able to estimate an individual patient's risk of harboring clinically silent micrometastatic disease using established prognostic factors. It is also beneficial to be able to select the optimal adjuvant therapy for an individual patient based on established predictive factors. It is standard practice to administer systemic therapy to all patients with lymph node-positive disease. However, there are clearly differences among node-positive women that may warrant a more aggressive therapeutic approach. Furthermore, there are many node-negative women who would also benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic factors therefore must be differentiated from predictive factors. A prognostic factor is any measurement available at the time of surgery that correlates with disease-free or overall survival in the absence of systemic adjuvant therapy and, as a result, is able to correlate with the natural history of the disease. In contrast, a predictive factor is any measurement associated with response to a given therapy. Some factors, such as hormone receptors and HER2/neu overexpression, are both prognostic and predictive.

591 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Napoleone Ferrara1
TL;DR: Recent work has shown that inhibiting tumor angiogenesis increases the effectiveness of coadministered chemotherapy and radiotherapy, suggesting that drugs that target VEGF or its receptors can be combined with traditional treatment modalities to ensure maximum effectiveness.
Abstract: The development of a vascular supply is a critical factor in the growth and metastatic spread of malignant tumors. Of the multitude of growth factors that regulate physiological and pathological angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is believed to be the most important. There is evidence that overexpression of VEGF is correlated with an adverse prognosis, at least in some tumors. Tumor-expressed VEGF is particularly attractive as a target for anticancer therapy because its angiogenesis-promoting activity is at the level of the endothelial cell and, compared with agents that directly target tumor cells, tumor penetration is less critical for VEGF inhibitors. Moreover, recent work has shown that inhibiting tumor angiogenesis increases the effectiveness of coadministered chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This suggests that drugs that target VEGF or its receptors can be combined with traditional treatment modalities to ensure maximum effectiveness. A variety of agents aimed at blocking VEGF or its receptor-signaling system are currently being developed for the treatment of cancer. Of these, bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at VEGF, is the most advanced in clinical development and has shown promising results in clinical trials.

560 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Jonathan Green1
TL;DR: A growing body of evidence from animal models demonstrates that zoledronic acid and other bisphosphonates can reduce skeletal tumor burden and prevent metastasis to bone and further studies are needed to determine if the antitumor potential of bisph phosphonates translates to the clinical setting.
Abstract: Bisphosphonates effectively inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are integral in the treatment of benign and malignant bone diseases. The evolution of bisphosphonates over the past 30 years has led to the development of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), which have a mechanism of action different from that of the nonnitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Studies conducted over the past decade have elucidated the mechanism of action and pharmacologic properties of the N-BPs. N-BPs exert their effects on osteoclasts and tumor cells by inhibiting a key enzyme in the mevalonate pathway, farnesyl diphosphate synthase, thus preventing protein prenylation and activation of intracellular signaling proteins such as Ras. Recent evidence suggests that N-BPs also induce production of a unique adenosine triphosphate analogue (Apppi) that can directly induce apoptosis. Our increased understanding of the pharmacologic effects of bisphosphonates is shedding light on the mechanisms by which they exert antitumor effects. As a result of their biochemical effects on protein prenylation, N-BPs induce caspase-dependent apoptosis, inhibit matrix metalloproteinase activity, and downregulate alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(v)beta(5) integrins. In addition, zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ and Basel, Switzerland) exerts synergistic antitumor activity when combined with other anticancer agents. Zoledronic acid also inhibits tumor cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix and invasion through Matrigel trade mark and has antiangiogenic activity. A growing body of evidence from animal models demonstrates that zoledronic acid and other bisphosphonates can reduce skeletal tumor burden and prevent metastasis to bone. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate these biochemical mechanisms and to determine if the antitumor potential of bisphosphonates translates to the clinical setting.

387 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate both significant and sustained pain reduction and a significantly lower incidence and longer time to onset of SREs compared with placebo, and it was shown by multiple event analysis to be significantly more effective at reducing the risk of an SRE.
Abstract: Bone is a preferred site of metastasis for many solid tumors, and the complications associated with bone metastases can result in significant skeletal morbidity including severe bone pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM). Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for preventing skeletal complications associated with bone metastases. Clinical trials investigating the benefit of bisphosphonate therapy have used a composite end point defined as a skeletal-related event (SRE) or bone event, which typically includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation or surgery to bone, and HCM. Bisphosphonates have been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of these events in patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ), pamidronate (Aredia; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.), clodronate (Bonefos; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), and ibandronate (Bondronat; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Nutley, NJ) all have demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has been compared directly with pamidronate, and it was shown by multiple event analysis to be significantly more effective at reducing the risk of an SRE. In patients with prostate cancer, clodronate, etidronate (Didronel; Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Cincinnati, OH), and pamidronate have demonstrated transient palliation of bone pain. However, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate both significant and sustained pain reduction and a significantly lower incidence and longer time to onset of SREs compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is also the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in patients with bone metastases from a variety of other solid tumors, including lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. In conclusion, bisphosphonates effectively reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, and zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity in patients with a wide variety of tumor types.

371 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Early evidence from experimental and clinical studies suggests the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) may enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy and chemotherapy by increasing hemoglobin levels and ameliorating anemia in patients with disease- or treatment-related anemia.
Abstract: Hypoxia is a common feature of solid tumors that occurs across a wide variety of malignancies. Hypoxia and anemia (which contributes to tumor hypoxia) can lead to ionizing radiation and chemotherapy resistance by depriving tumor cells of the oxygen essential for the cytotoxic activities of these agents. Hypoxia may also reduce tumor sensitivity to radiation therapy and chemotherapy through one or more indirect mechanisms that include proteomic and genomic changes. These effects, in turn, can lead to increased invasiveness and metastatic potential, loss of apoptosis, and chaotic angiogenesis, thereby further increasing treatment resistance. Investigations of the prognostic significance of pretreatment tumor oxygenation status have shown that hypoxia (oxygen tension [pO(2)] value < or =10 mmHg) is associated with lower overall and disease-free survival, greater recurrence, and less locoregional control in head and neck carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and soft-tissue sarcoma. In view of the deleterious effect of hypoxia on standard cancer treatment, a variety of hypoxia- and anemia-targeted therapies have been studied in an effort to improve therapeutic effectiveness and patient outcomes. Early evidence from experimental and clinical studies suggests the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) may enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy and chemotherapy by increasing hemoglobin levels and ameliorating anemia in patients with disease- or treatment-related anemia. However, further research is needed in the area of hypoxia-related treatment resistance and its reversal.

350 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) is reviewed, and implications for oncologists are discussed.
Abstract: Many cancer patients use therapies promoted as literal alternatives to conventional medical care. Such “alternative” modalities are unproven or were studied and found worthless. These can be harmful. An even greater proportion of cancer patients uses “complementary” therapies along with mainstream cancer treatment. Most are helpful adjunctive approaches that control symptoms and enhance quality of life. This review describes alternative as well as complementary therapies commonly used today by cancer patients. Herbal remedies also are discussed. Evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) is reviewed, and implications for oncologists are discussed. To encourage open communication of CAM use by patients, oncologists should be knowledgeable about the most popular remedies and know where to find reliable information for themselves and for their patients. The Oncologist 2004;9:80-89

339 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: As the number of treatment options for metastatic spinal disease grows, it has become clear that effective implementation of treatment can only be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach.
Abstract: Metastatic spread to the spinal column is a growing problem in patients with cancer. It can cause a number of sequelae including pain, instability, and neurologic deficit. If left untreated, progressive myelopathy results in the loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions. Except in rare circumstances, treatment is palliative. Traditionally, conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy has been the treatment of choice. "Surgery" for metastatic spinal disease was, and generally continues to be, equated with laminectomy by many physicians. However, there has been a remarkable evolution in surgical techniques over the last 20 years. Today, the goal of surgery is to achieve circumferential decompression of the neural elements while reconstructing and immediately stabilizing the spinal column. This has been made possible by the use of different surgical approaches and the exploitation of a burgeoning array of internal fixation devices. More recently, minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as endoscopy, kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty, and stereotactic radiosurgery, have been added to the surgeon's armamentarium. As the number of treatment options for metastatic spinal disease grows, it has become clear that effective implementation of treatment can only be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach. This will provide the surest means of maximizing the quality of the remainder of the patient's life.

317 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The prognosis for unresectable patients is poor, and palliative measures should be aimed at increasing quality of life first and increasing survival second, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have not improved survival in patients with this tumor.
Abstract: Cholangiocarcinoma presents a formidable diagnostic and treatment challenge. The majority of patients present with unresectable disease and have a survival of less than 12 months following diagnosis. Progress has been made by the appropriate selection of patients for treatment options including resection, with the routine use of more aggressive resections in order to achieve margin-negative resections. This has resulted in longer survival times for these patients. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have, for the most part, not improved survival in patients with this tumor, and new strategies are needed to improve this line of therapy. The prognosis for unresectable patients is poor, and palliative measures should be aimed at increasing quality of life first and increasing survival second.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Assessment of biologic correlates in patients with metastatic breast cancer indicates that increased tumor cell apoptosis on the terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay correlates with clinical response; lapatinib currently is being evaluated in phase II and phase III trials.
Abstract: Dual inhibition of ErbB-1 (EGFR) and ErbB-2 (HER-2) tyrosine kinases has been found to exert greater biologic effects in the inhibition of signaling pathways promoting cancer cell proliferation and survival than inhibition of either receptor alone. The novel dual EGFR/ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib (GlaxoSmithKline; Research Triangle Park, NC) has been shown to inhibit tumor cell growth in vitro and in xenograft models for a variety of human tumors. Preliminary findings in a phase I study of lapatinib in patients with solid tumors indicate doses up to 1,800 mg per day are well tolerated. No grade 4 toxicities were observed and only two of 43 patients had grade 3 toxicity (diarrhea). Clinical activity of lapatinib was observed in these patients; nine patients with a variety of tumors remained on study for > or =4 months, one with a complete response (head and neck cancer). In a phase IB study in pretreated metastatic cancer patients with disease that could be biopsied, grade 1 or 2 diarrhea and rash were the most common adverse events. Three patients with breast cancer refractory to trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, CA) had partial responses and 12 patients with a variety of tumors had stable disease. Assessment of biologic correlates in these patients indicates that increased tumor cell apoptosis on the terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay correlates with clinical response. Lapatinib currently is being evaluated in phase II and phase III trials in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although its general use cannot be recommended, low-dose warfarin may be a low-risk treatment in patients with good nutrition and adequate hepatic function, and additional studies are required to substantiate the prophylactic use of low- dose warfarins.
Abstract: Central venous catheters (CVCs), such as the tunneled catheters and the totally implanted ports, play a major role in general medicine and oncology. Aside from the complications (pneumothorax, hemorrhage) associated with their initial insertion, all of these CVCs are associated with the long-term risks of infection and thrombosis. Despite routine flushing with heparin or saline, 41% of CVCs result in thrombosis of the blood vessel, and this markedly increases the risk of infection. Only one-third of these clots are symptomatic. Within days of insertion, almost all CVCs are coated with a fibrin sheath, and within 30 days, most CVC-related thrombi arise. Aside from reducing the function of the catheter, these CVC-related thrombi can cause postphlebitic syndrome in 15%-30% of cases and pulmonary embolism in 11% (only half of which are symptomatic). Risk factors for CVC thrombosis include the type of malignancy, type of chemotherapy, type of CVC, and locations of insertion site and catheter tip, but not inherited thrombophilic risk factors. Efforts to reduce CVC thrombosis with systemic prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin have failed. Low-dose warfarin prophylaxis remains controversial; all studies are flawed, with older studies, but not newer ones, showing benefit. Currently, less than 10% of patients with CVCs receive any systemic prophylaxis. Although its general use cannot be recommended, low-dose warfarin may be a low-risk treatment in patients with good nutrition and adequate hepatic function. Clearly, additional studies are required to substantiate the prophylactic use of low-dose warfarin. Newer anticoagulant treatments, such as pentasaccharide and direct thrombin inhibitors, need to be explored to address this major medical problem.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on the more common abnormalities in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in human breast cancer and their known associations with clinical outcome in terms of tumor classification, prognosis, and response to specific therapies.
Abstract: Carcinogenesis is a multistep process characterized by genetic alterations that influence key cellular pathways involved in growth and development. Oncogenes refer to those genes whose alterations cause gain-of-function effects, while tumor suppressor genes cause loss-of-function effects that contribute to the malignant phenotype. The effects of these alterations are complex due to the high number of changes in a typical case of breast cancer and the interactions of the biological pathways involved. This review focuses on the more common abnormalities in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in human breast cancer and their known associations with clinical outcome in terms of tumor classification, prognosis, and response to specific therapies. A better understanding of these relationships has led to new therapeutic applications. Agents that target oncogenes and their associated pathways are now in clinical use, with many more undergoing preclinical and clinical testing. The availability of antibodies, small synthetic molecules, cyotokines, gene therapy techniques, and even natural compounds that are screened for specific biological properties has greatly increased the number of candidate drugs. Nevertheless, clinical successes have been limited because of the redundancy of many cancer-related pathways as well as the high degree of variability in genotype and phenotype among individual tumors. Likewise, strategies to replace tumor suppressor gene functions face numerous technical hurdles. This review summarizes the current achievements and future prospects for the therapeutic targeting of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes and new technology to better classify tumors and accurately predict responses to standard and novel agents.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment options available to manage visible bleeding in patients with advanced cancer are reviewed, as are systemic treatments such as vitamin K, vasopressin/desmopressin, octreotide/somatostatin, antifibrinolytic agents, and blood products.
Abstract: Bleeding occurs in up to 10% of patients with advanced cancer. It can present in many different ways. This article provides a qualitative review of treatment options available to manage visible bleeding. Local modalities, such as hemostatic agents and dressings, radiotherapy, endoscopic ligation and coagulation, and transcutaneous arterial embolization, are reviewed in the context of advanced cancer, as are systemic treatments such as vitamin K, vasopressin/desmopressin, octreotide/somatostatin, antifibrinolytic agents (tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid), and blood products. Considerations at the end of life are described.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Intravenous bisphosphonates require less frequent dosing (once a month) and are generally well tolerated with long-term use in patients with bone metastases.
Abstract: Patients with advanced cancers--particularly breast and prostate cancers--are at high risk for bone metastasis, leading to accelerated bone resorption and clinically significant skeletal morbidity. Bisphosphonates are effective inhibitors of bone resorption and reduce the risk of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases. The standard routes of administration for bisphosphonates used in clinical practice are either oral or i.v. infusion. Oral administration of bisphosphonates is complicated by poor bioavailability (generally <5%) and poor gastrointestinal tolerability. First-generation bisphosphonates, such as clodronate (Bonefos; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), must be administered at high oral doses (1,600-3,200 mg/day) to achieve therapeutic effects, which leads to poor tolerability and compliance with oral dosing regimens. Infusion of bisphosphonates is associated with dose- and infusion-rate-dependent effects on renal function. In particular, high bisphosphonate doses (e.g., 1,500 mg clodronate) can cause severe renal toxicity unless infused slowly over many hours. In contrast, the newer, more potent bisphosphonates effectively inhibit bone resorption at micromolar concentrations, and the small doses required can be administered via relatively short i.v. infusions without adversely affecting renal function. Zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ) is a new generation bisphosphonate, and the recommended dose of 4 mg can be safely infused over 15 minutes. The 90-mg dose of pamidronate (Aredia; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) and the 6-mg dose of ibandronate (Bondronat; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Nutley, NJ) require 1- to 4-hour infusions. Intravenous bisphosphonates require less frequent dosing (once a month) and are generally well tolerated with long-term use in patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity in patients with bone metastases.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the benefit-to-risk ratio of docetaxel compared to paclitaxel when these drugs are used as single agents or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in an every-3-week dosing regimen.
Abstract: Taxanes are one of the most powerful classes of compounds among all chemotherapeutic drugs. Only 30 years separate the isolation of the first taxane from the results of direct clinical comparisons in metastatic breast, ovarian, and lung cancer between the two taxanes available in routine clinical practice. These results suggest a more favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for docetaxel compared to paclitaxel when these drugs are used as single agents or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in an every-3-week dosing regimen. Pharmacological data support the difference between the taxanes, likely explaining the clinical results. Considering the molecular pharmacology of the two drugs, docetaxel appears to bind to beta-tubulin with greater affinity and has a wider cell cycle activity than paclitaxel. Docetaxel also appears to have direct antitumoral activity via an apoptotic effect mediated by bcl-2 phosphorylation. In addition, docetaxel has a longer retention time in tumor cells than paclitaxel because of greater uptake and slower efflux. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the taxanes show both agents to be extensively metabolized in the liver, and paclitaxel has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior while docetaxel has linear pharmacokinetics. These differences explain the more simple treatment schedule and favorable results for docetaxel as a single agent and in combination therapy. Last, but not least, there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and the anthracyclines, an active class of compounds commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. This pharmacokinetic interaction is associated with greater cardio- and myelotoxicities, which are sequence dependent. These pharmacological data likely explain the different clinical development strategies for the two molecules as well as the different clinical results from individual trials and direct comparisons.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The pharmacokinetic profile, consistent positive clinical results, and convenience of an intermittent, short-infusion schedule have made docetaxel the preferred taxane for many clinicians treating patients with breast cancer.
Abstract: In the 10 years since their initial licensing in Europe, the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have emerged as fundamental drugs in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinically meaningful benefits were first shown in the metastatic setting, and large-scale exploration of their roles in the adjuvant therapy of early-stage disease is ongoing. Benefits have been seen in the neoadjuvant setting as well, mainly with docetaxel. This paper reviews the current roles of the taxanes in the treatment of metastatic and early-stage breast cancer. Also addressed are outstanding issues involving optimal dosing and sequencing, as well as a discussion of the relative merits of each agent in this setting. Clinicians should choose a taxane-based regimen for their patients with breast cancer based on consideration of the pharmacokinetics, clinical activity, and dosing schedule that best meets the patients’ needs. At the current time, the pharmacokinetic profile, consistent positive clinical results, and convenience of an intermittent, short-infusion schedule have made docetaxel the preferred taxane for many clinicians treating patients with breast cancer. The Oncologist

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The value of PET in the locoregional and distant staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is reviewed, the potential effects on patient management are illustrated, and a short overview of newer applications are given.
Abstract: Positron emission tomography (PET) is now an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosis and staging, as well as offering prognostic information based on response. This report attempts to comprehensively review the value of PET in the locoregional and distant staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), illustrate the potential effects on patient management, and give a short overview of newer applications. PET sets the gold standard in the evaluation of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule or mass, where PET has proven to be significantly more accurate than computed tomography (CT) in the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. In the evaluation of metastatic spread to locoregional lymph nodes, PET is significantly more accurate than CT, so that invasive surgical staging may be omitted in many patients with negative mediastinal PET images. In patients with positive mediastinal PET images, invasive surgical staging remains mandatory because of the possibility of false-positive findings due to inflammatory nodes or granulomatous disorders. In the search for metastatic spread, PET is a useful adjunct to conventional imaging. This may be due to the finding of unexpected metastatic lesions or due to exclusion of malignancy in lesions that are equivocal on standard imaging. However, at this time, PET does not replace conventional imaging. Large-scale randomized studies are currently examining whether PET staging will actually improve the appearance of lung cancer outcome.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The evidence supporting the use of each class of adjuvant analgesic for the treatment of pain in cancer patients is reviewed and a comprehensive outline of dosing recommendations, side effects, and drug interactions is provided.
Abstract: Adjuvant analgesics are defined as drugs with a primary indication other than pain that have analgesic properties in some painful conditions. The group includes numerous drugs in diverse classes. Although the widespread use of these drugs as first-line agents in chronic nonmalignant pain syndromes suggests that the term "adjuvant" is a misnomer, they usually are combined with a less-than-satisfactory opioid regimen when administered for cancer pain. Some adjuvant analgesics are useful in several painful conditions and are described as multipurpose adjuvant analgesics (antidepressants, corticosteroids, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists, neuroleptics), whereas others are specific for neuropathic pain (anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists), bone pain (calcitonin, bisphosphonates, radiopharmaceuticals), musculoskeletal pain (muscle relaxants), or pain from bowel obstruction (octreotide, anticholinergics). This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of each class of adjuvant analgesic for the treatment of pain in cancer patients and provides a comprehensive outline of dosing recommendations, side effects, and drug interactions.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of MR perfusion in differentiating treatment effects, such as radiation necrosis, from tumor recurrence, and its advantages over more conventional methods are discussed.
Abstract: In this paper, we review the technique of contrastenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging of brain neoplasms, with an emphasis on its clinical applications and utility. We start with a discussion of MR perfusion techniques available today and their relative merits and shortcomings. Next, the ability of MR perfusion to provide a preoperative assessment of tumor histology is examined. We also discuss the role of MR perfusion in helping guide tumor biopsy, and its advantages over more conventional methods. We will scrutinize the use of MR perfusion for assessing true lesion extent, in contrast to conventional MR imaging and other MR techniques. We will discuss the role of MR perfusion in differentiating treatment effects, such as radiation necrosis, from tumor recurrence. Finally, the future potential applications of this technology in the setting of novel antiangiogenic therapies for brain tumors will be addressed. The Oncologist 2004;9:528-537

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The addition of chemotherapy seems to improve the survival of a subset of these children, particularly those with glioblastoma multiforme, however, 2-year survival rates remain poor for children with supratentorial neoplasms.
Abstract: Pediatric high-grade gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors that accounts for 15%-20% of all pediatric central nervous system tumors. These neoplasms predominantly involve the supratentorial hemispheres or the pons, in which case the tumors are usually called diffuse brainstem gliomas. The diagnosis of supratentorial neoplasms is dependent on their histologic appearance. The maximum possible surgical resection is always attempted since the degree of surgical resection is the main prognostic factor for these patients. Older children (>3 years) with supratentorial neoplasms undergo a multimodality treatment comprised of surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The addition of chemotherapy seems to improve the survival of a subset of these children, particularly those with glioblastoma multiforme. However, 2-year survival rates remain poor for children with supratentorial neoplasms, ranging from 10%-30%. The diagnosis of a diffuse brainstem glioma is based upon typical imaging, dispensing with the need for surgery in the majority of cases. Radiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for children with diffuse brainstem gliomas. The role of chemotherapy for these children is not clear, and it is, in general, employed in the context of an investigational study. Less than 10% of children with diffuse brainstem gliomas survive 2 years. Because the outcome for patients with either type of tumor is poor when standard multimodality therapy is used, these children are ideal candidates for innovative treatment approaches.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results suggest that epoetin alfa may provide a therapeutic benefit in patients with stroke, trauma, epilepsy, and other CNS-related disorders and further study of EPO and the EPO receptor in nonhematopoietic tissue is warranted to determine the potential therapeutic usefulness of rHuEPO.
Abstract: Erythropoietin (EPO) is the primary regulator of erythropoiesis, stimulating growth, preventing apoptosis, and promoting differentiation of red blood cell progenitors. The EPO receptor belongs to the cytokine receptor superfamily. Although the primary role of EPO is the regulation of red blood cell production, EPO and its receptor have been localized to several nonhematopoietic tissues and cells, including the central nervous system (CNS), endothelial cells, solid tumors, the liver, and the uterus. The presence of EPO receptors and the possibility of EPO signaling in these tissues and cells have led to numerous studies of the effects of EPO at these sites. In particular, expression of EPO and the EPO receptor in cancer cells has generated much interest because of concern that administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to patients with breast and other cancer cells expressing the EPO receptor may promote tumor growth via the induction of cell proliferation or angiogenesis. However, evidence supporting a growth-promoting effect has been inconclusive. Moreover, several preclinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of EPO on delaying tumor growth. Further, it is conceivable that increased expression of EPO could reduce tumor hypoxia and ameliorate the deleterious effects of hypoxia on tumor growth, metastasis, and treatment resistance. On the other hand, EPO has also been shown to produce an angiogenic effect in vascular endothelial cells in vitro. However, there is no evidence that these effects occur in vivo to promote tumor growth. EPO and EPO receptors are expressed in neural tissue, and they are upregulated there by hypoxia. Animal studies have shown that administration of epoetin alfa (an rHuEPO) reduces tissue injury due to ischemic stroke, blunt trauma, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. These findings suggest that epoetin alfa may provide a therapeutic benefit in patients with stroke, trauma, epilepsy, and other CNSrelated disorders. Clearly, further study of EPO and the EPO receptor in nonhematopoietic tissue is warranted to determine the potential therapeutic usefulness of rHuEPO as well as to determine the signaling pathway responsible for its effect in vivo. The Oncologist 2004;9(suppl 5):18-30

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The potential role of tumor molecular profile(s) in the selection of patients that could benefit the most from each strategy/agent will be discussed and the current knowledge and controversial issues related to systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer will be summarized.
Abstract: The management of metastatic breast cancer remains an important and controversial issue. The systemic therapy, comprising endocrine, cytotoxic and biological agents, can be administered sequentially or in combination. Few drugs or combinations provide a significant improvement in survival and, therefore, in the great majority of cases, treatment is given with a palliative intent. With the exception of first-line therapy, for which general agreement exists, currently there is no consensual standard of care. This review will summarize the current knowledge and outline the controversial issues related to systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer, with emphasis on treatment tailoring. The potential role of tumor molecular profile(s) in the selection of patients that could benefit the most from each strategy/agent will be discussed.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: With prompt and appropriate intervention, adverse effects in imatinib-treated patients have proven to be manageable across the spectrum of severity, and they seldom require permanent cessation of therapy.
Abstract: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), Glivec, formerly STI571; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel, Switzerland) is a rationally-designed, molecularly-specific oral anticancer agent that selectively inhibits several protein tyrosine kinases central to the pathogenesis of human cancer. It has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Treatment with imatinib is generally well tolerated, and the risk for severe adverse effects is low. Adverse effects most commonly include mild-to-moderate edema, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle cramps, and cutaneous reactions. Hepatic transaminase level elevations and myelosuppression occur less frequently and resolve with interruption of imatinib therapy. In general, the incidence and severity of adverse effects tend to correlate with imatinib dose and, in chronic myeloid leukemia patients, the phase of disease; but, patient age and other factors are also associated with some types of reactions. With prompt and appropriate intervention, adverse effects in imatinib-treated patients have proven to be manageable across the spectrum of severity, and they seldom require permanent cessation of therapy. Dose reduction is not usually necessary, and reduction to subtherapeutic levels is not recommended.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fu/LV and irinotecan.
Abstract: The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A concise, up-to-date summary of LGL leukemia and the related, more aggressive, malignancies of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells is provided.
Abstract: T-cell large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia is a clonal proliferation of cytotoxic T cells, which causes neutropenia, anemia, and/or thrombocytopenia. This condition is often associated with autoimmune disorders, especially rheumatoid arthritis, and other lymphoproliferative disorders. The diagnosis is suggested by flow cytometry demonstrating an expansion of CD8(+)CD57(+) T cells and is confirmed by T-cell receptor gene rearrangement studies. Mounting evidence suggests that LGL leukemia is a disorder of dysregulation of apoptosis through abnormalities in the Fas/Fas ligand pathway. In most patients, this is an indolent disorder, and significant improvement of cytopenias can be achieved with immunosuppressive agents such as steroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporin A. This review provides a concise, up-to-date summary of LGL leukemia and the related, more aggressive, malignancies of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinicians should recognize the genetic syndromes that predispose to the development of breast cancer so that patients may be afforded the opportunity to have genetic testing to assist them and their family members in making medical management decisions.
Abstract: Clinicians should recognize the genetic syndromes that predispose to the development of breast cancer so that patients may be afforded the opportunity to have genetic testing to assist them and their family members in making medical management decisions. Approximately 80%-90% of hereditary breast cancer cases are caused by mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Other important clinical genetic predispositions include Cowden syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and ataxia-telangiectasia. The key to identifying women who are at risk for a hereditary breast cancer lies in obtaining an adequate, three-generation family history, including ethnic background. For unaffected women, breast cancer risks can be estimated using the quantitative models of Gail and Claus, but there are limitations to these models. Other quantitative models predict the likelihood that a patient is carrying a mutated gene. Genetic testing is available at selected laboratories for each of the hereditary syndromes described, and there are three possible outcomes to testing. These outcomes and their management implications are described in detail. Clinical management options for women at high risk for breast cancer include surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgery. Application of these principles can reduce morbidity in women with genetic predispositions to breast cancer.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Despite promising single-agent activity in chemotherapy-resistant patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disappointing results from two phase III trials of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in NSCLC have been of concern to some.
Abstract: Human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER, targeting has formed the basis of extensive and growing drug development programs in various companies. However, receptor biology is often poorly explained and confusing. The HER family of four naturally occurring receptors and one tumor-specific mutant can activate signaling via a complex and sophisticated range of mechanisms, which we are only beginning to understand. HER1/EGFR downstream signaling can lead to tumor growth and development via a host of processes, including enhanced cellular proliferation, survival, and metastasis. A range of potential therapeutic targets exists within the HER signaling system, both inside and outside the cell. Monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, acting extracellularly and intracellularly, respectively, comprise two classes of agents most advanced in clinical development or already available for use. Despite promising single-agent activity in chemotherapy-resistant patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disappointing results from two phase III trials of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in NSCLC have been of concern to some. However, many factors may have contributed to this outcome, and it is not necessarily predictive of the future usefulness of these agents. Patient characteristics, lack of patient selection, dosing schedule, and trial design may all have played roles. It is important to remember that intracellular targeting of HER is a relatively novel approach, and our knowledge of how best to optimize such treatment is still unfolding. More clinical experience is needed.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A large, ongoing, phase III, cooperative group trial is evaluating the effect of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic disease.
Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a key target for the treatment of cancer. As the ligand to the VEGF receptor, it plays a central role in promoting tumor angiogenesis. Overexpression of VEGF leads to poor outcomes in patients with breast cancer and other tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that the humanized monoclonal antibody to VEGF, bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), can reduce tumor angiogenesis and inhibit the growth of solid tumors, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. As a single agent or added to vinorelbine, bevacizumab has produced encouraging results in phase II clinical trials in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer. When added to capecitabine chemotherapy in a phase III trial, bevacizumab produced a greater response rate, but did not prolong progression-free survival. This may reflect the late disease stage and poor prognostic factors in the patient population. A large, ongoing, phase III, cooperative group trial is evaluating the effect of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. The adverse effect profile of bevacizumab differs from that of cytotoxic chemotherapy and includes hypertension, proteinuria, thrombosis, and epistaxis.