scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Sophia in 2011"


Journal ArticleDOI
30 Dec 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Reflexiones filosoficas sobre la tecnologia and sus nuevos escenarios as discussed by the authors, in particular, present a breve descripcion of algunas caracteristicas historicas, reflexion acerca de la funcion y del uso de the tecnology in the nuevo escenario de la sociedad, and concluye con el analisis del impact of the impact of la teocologia in diversas manifestaciones: en la vision del mundo
Abstract: El articulo “Reflexiones filosoficas sobre la tecnologia y sus nuevos escenarios”, inicia con una aproximacion conceptual a la tecnologia, en la que presenta una breve descripcion de algunas caracteristicas historicas, reflexiona acerca de la funcion y del uso de la tecnologia en los nuevos escenarios de la sociedad. Avanza con el analisis de los fundamentos de la tecnologia en cuanto tal, aborda los fundamentos filosoficos y sobre los fundamentos sociologicos de la tecnologia aplicada a la educacion. Continua con la reflexion acerca de los problemas y de los saberes de la tecnologia; en este sentido, re-piensa a la tecnologia como realidad y como conocimiento; estudia la naturaleza de la realidad y del conocimiento tecnologico; revisa por que el ser humano, la educacion y la tecnologia constituyen un problema en si y por si mismo; describe los saberes integradores de la tecnologia con enfasis en la teoria, en la filosofia, en la axiologia, y en la metodologia de la tecnologia. El articulo concluye con el analisis del impacto de la tecnologia en sus diversas manifestaciones: en la vision del mundo, en la educacion, etcetera.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The authors explored the fruitfulness of Heidegger's work for deciphering the various strands of posthumanism recently formulated in response to contemporary technological developments, including the posthuman body to be a forfeitable nuisance, rather than an inherent aspect of being human.
Abstract: Discussion of the posthuman has emerged in a wide set of fields through a diverse set of thinkers including Donna Haraway, Ray Kurzweil, Nick Bostrom, N. Katherine Hayles, and Francis Fukuyama, just to name a few. Despite his extensive critique of technology, commentators have not explored the fruitfulness of Heidegger's work for deciphering the various strands of posthumanism recently formulated in response to contemporary technological developments. Here, I employ Heidegger's critique of technology to trace opposing visions of the posthuman, visions that are both tied intimately to new information technologies. For those seeking to extend humanist ideals, information technologies are employed to extend the vision of an ultra-humanist view of a ‘scientific posthuman’ that dangerously understands the body to be a forfeitable nuisance, rather than an inherent aspect of being human. Along Heideggerian lines, thinkers such as N. Katherine Hayles and Thomas Carlson have developed an alternative trajectory related to Dasein's Being-in-the-world. This trajectory posits the self as constituted by a lack or abyss, enabling the formulation of a ‘mystical posthuman,’ celebrating, rather than forfeiting, humanity's embodied existence.

17 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
02 Aug 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, a solution to the problem of the Trinity is proposed, according to which it is just an ordinary claim of one-many identity, which is compatible with Christian Orthodoxy as given by the Athanasian Creed.
Abstract: Roughly, the problem of the Trinity is the problem of how God can be one and yet be the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which are three, not one. That one thing is identical with three distinct things seems to violate traditional laws of identity. I propose a solution to this problem according to which it is just an ordinary claim of one-many identity. For example, one pair of shoes is identical with two shoes; and my one body is identical with its six limbs of arms, legs, head, and torso. The pair of shoes is not identical with each one of the two shoes, nor is my body identical with each one of its six limbs, but rather identical with all of them taken together, or collectively. I argue that the problem of the Trinity should be understood accordingly: God is identical with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit collectively, but not with each one of them distributively. According to the way I develop this proposal, no traditional laws of identity are violated, but merely generalized in an intuitive way. I argue that this is compatible with Christian Orthodoxy as given by the Athanasian Creed. I end by responding to some anticipated objections.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, the wax and gold tradition is analyzed as a poetic and literary tradition for Ethiopian hermeneutics, and the implications of this tradition for the Ethiopian Hermeneutic system are discussed.
Abstract: This essay is an attempt to assess critically the wax and gold tradition as a philosophical foundation of Ethiopian hermeneutics. In the first part, I shall analyze the wax and gold tradition as a poetic and literary tradition. After exploring how this tradition has shaped social and political interaction in the second part, in the third part I will show the implications of the wax and gold tradition for hermeneutics. I shall then make a critical assessment of the wax and gold tradition as an interpretive philosophy before closing the essay with concluding remarks.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
19 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, Bernanos describes the feeling of being so bored that "the work bored me so much that I had to mobilize all my will in order to continue, and all that I felt in doing so was a tremendous tiredness".
Abstract: ‘It is like dust. You go about and never notice. . . . But stand still for an instant and there it is, coating your face and hands’ — George Bernanos (Winokur 2005, p.18). ‘I have never been so bored as when I was in the process of completing a large dissertation after several years of work. The work bored me so much that I had to mobilize all my will in order to continue, and all that I felt in doing so was a tremendous tiredness’ (Svendsen 2005, p. 35). ‘When I get real bored, I like to drive downtown and get a great parking spot, then sit in my car and count how many people ask me if I’m leaving’ — Steven Wright (Winokur 2005, p. 133).

12 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, a multi-step argument for an "all-inclusive" thesis is presented, which states that the Aristotelian philosopher or contemplator is someone who already possesses all the intellectual virtues (except technē), all the moral virtues (by way of the possession of phronēsis), and considerable other goods.
Abstract: The debate between ‘inclusive’ and ‘dominant’ interpretations of Aristotle's concept of happiness (eudaimonia) has become one of the thorniest problems of Aristotle interpretation. In this paper, I attempt to solve this problem by presenting a multi-step argument for an ‘all-inclusive’ thesis, i.e., the Aristotelian philosopher or contemplator, in the strict sense, is someone who already possesses all the intellectual virtues (except technē), all the moral virtues (by way of the possession of phronēsis), and considerable other goods. If this thesis is correct, the inclusive and dominant interpretations will converge, for the philosopher turns out to be the happiest human being both in the inclusive and dominant senses.

11 citations


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jul 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: A survey of current thinking among psychologists, psychoanalysts and philosophers on the enigma of grief and the associated process of mourning can be found in this article, where the authors consider various ruminations on the aftermath of the death of a close or loved one, and the processes of grieving and mourning.
Abstract: The paper considers various ruminations on the aftermath of the death of a close or loved one, and the processes of grieving and mourning. The conceptual examination of how grief impacts on its sufferers, from different cultural perspectives, is followed by an analytical survey of current thinking among psychologists, psychoanalysts and philosophers on the enigma of grief, and on the associated process of mourning. Robert C. Solomon reflected deeply on the ‘extreme emotion’ of grief in his extensive theorizing on the emotions, particularly in his essay ‘On Grief and Gratitude’, commenting that grief is ‘often described as a very private, personal emotion, characterized by social withdrawal and shutting oneself off from the world’ (Solomon RC, On grief and gratitude. In: In defense of sentimentality. Oxford University Press, New York, 2004: 73). While dialoguing with the spirit of Solomon by way also of a tribute to his immense insights, the paper engages in critical reflections on recent thinking in this area elsewhere—notably, in Heidegger, Freud, Nussbaum, Casey, Gustafson, and Kristeva—and offers a refreshing critique toward an alternative to the received wisdom.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
24 Sep 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In the early work of Camus, up to and including the publication of The Myth of Sisyphus, there is evidence to support the notions that, firstly, Camus also identified these historical moments as obstacles to the practice of ascesis, and secondly, that he proceeded by orienting his own work toward overcoming these obstacles, and thus toward a modern rehabilitation of Ascesis.
Abstract: This paper compares Pierre Hadot’s work on the history of philosophy as a way of life to the work of Albert Camus. I will argue that in the early work of Camus, up to and including the publication of The Myth of Sisyphus, there is evidence to support the notions that, firstly, Camus also identified these historical moments as obstacles to the practice of ascesis, and secondly, that he proceeded by orienting his own work toward overcoming these obstacles, and thus toward a modern rehabilitation of ascesis. Moreover, in contrast to Hadot’s Platonism, Camus located the source of this practice in the pre-philosophical stage of Athenian tragedy. This points to a further contrast between these two figures, which has historical and cultural precedents, in the distinction between this pre-Platonic form of ascesis - favoured by Camus - and the latter Christian form of asceticism - favoured by Hadot, with the status of Platonic ascesis rendered in terms of prefiguring this Christian form of asceticism.

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Social contractual utilitarianism as mentioned in this paper is a non-standard theory of morality, and its acceptance would have some far-reaching consequences, and it is not the same as any of them.
Abstract: A theory of morality acceptable to humanists must be one that can be accepted independently of religion. In this paper, I argue that while there is such a theory, it is a non-standard one, and its acceptance would have some far-reaching consequences. As one might expect, the theory is similar to others in various ways. But it is not the same as any of them. Indeed, it is a radically new theory. Like Hume’s ethics, it is founded on our natural sociability, and feelings of empathy for others. Like Aristotle’s theory, it incorporates an ethics of virtue. Like Kant’s theory, it regards the set of moral principles as those appropriate for a socially ideal society. But unlike Kant’s theory, it is essentially utilitarian. I call it ‘social contractual utilitarianism’.

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Paul C. Anders1
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, van Inwagen argued that the very features of the view that aid the proponent in responding to the duplication objection entail the possibility of an impossible state of affairs, that two distinct persons can at the same time be identical with the same bundle of material simples.
Abstract: Many religiously minded materialist philosophers have attempted to understand the doctrine of the survival of death from within a physicalist approach. Their goal is not to show the doctrine false, but to explain how it can be true. One such approach has been developed by Peter van Inwagen. After explaining what I call the duplication objection, I present van Inwagen’s proposal and show how a proponent might attempt to solve the problem of duplication. I argue that the very features of the view that aid the proponent in responding to the duplication objection entails the possibility of an impossible state of affairs—that two distinct persons can at the same time be identical with the same bundle of material simples. The religiously minded materialist is caught between the horns of a dilemma. One’s view regarding human persons must be robust enough to account for personal identity over time, and so not fall to the duplication objection. At the same time, the view must not entail the possibility of two persons temporarily having complete coincident existence.

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Matthew Sharpe1
24 Nov 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Camus' famous philosophy of the absurd represents a systematic scepticism whose closest philosophical predecessor is Descartes' method of doubt, and whose consequence is the discovery of a single, orienting certainty, on the basis of which Camus would proceed to pass beyond the 'nihilism' that conservative critics continued to level against him as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: What follows is a work of critical reconstruction of Camus' thought. It aims to answer to the wish Camus expressed in his later notebooks, that he at least be read closely. Specifically, I hope to do three things. In Part I, we will show how Camus' famous philosophy of the absurd represents a systematic scepticism whose closest philosophical predecessor is Descartes' method of doubt, and whose consequence, as in Descartes, is the discovery of a single, orienting certainty, on the basis of which Camus would proceed to pass beyond the 'nihilism' that conservative critics continued to level against him (MS 34). Part II will unfold the central tenets of Camus' mature thought of rebellion, and show how Camus' central political claims follow from his para-Cartesian claim to have found an irreducible or 'invincible' basis for a post-metaphysical ethics, consistent with the most thoroughgoing epistemic scepticism. Part III then undertakes to show that the neoclassical rhetoric and positioning Camus claimed for his postwar thought—as a thought of moderation or mesure, and a renewed Greek or Mediterranean naturalism—is more than a stylistic pretension. It represents, so I argue, a singular amalgam of modern and philosophical classical motifs which makes Camus' voice nearly unique in twentieth century ideas, and all the more worth reconsidering today. So let us proceed.

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Jan 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, Dussel has developed a sweeping philosophical critique of the eurocentricity of Western habits of thought and action, with the aim of articulating an "ethics of liberation" that takes the part distinctively of "the victims" of the world system.
Abstract: Enrique Dussel has developed a sweeping philosophical critique of the eurocentricity of Western habits of thought and action, with the aim of articulating an ‘ethics of liberation’ that takes the part distinctively of ‘the victims’ of the world system. The heart of Dussel’s effort is an ostensibly new method, ‘analectic’ or ‘anadialectic,’ which comes about through the ‘revelation’ of the other, and goes beyond the self-enclosure that, Dussel asserts, typifies dialectic in Western ontology. Thus, he takes his position to have gone beyond ontology: it is a trans-ontology, a genuine meta-physics. I question whether analectic does go beyond Western thinking of being, and propose an ontological critique that is classically Western or, as I would prefer to say, historically Western yet (along with its analogues in other philosophical traditions) classically relevant even in our ‘age of globalization and exclusion.’

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors distinguish, describe and explore two different conceptions of love that inform our lives, one found its classic philosophical articulation in Plato, the other its richest expressions in Christian thought.
Abstract: I distinguish, describe and explore two different conceptions of love that inform our lives. One conception found its classic philosophical articulation in Plato, the other its richest expressions in Christian thought. The latter has not had the same secure place in our philosophical traditon as the former. By trying to bring out what is distinctive in this second conception of love, centrally including its significance in revealing the fundamental value of human beings, I aim to show the importance of extending our philosophical reflection to acknowledge it.

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, the authors have explained some of the uses of the word "freedom" in Western as well as in Indian philosophy, and discussed the distinction between fatalism, determinism, types of compatibilism, and libertarianism.
Abstract: This paper explains some of the uses of the word ‘freedom’ in Western as well as in Indian philosophy. Regarding the psychological concept of freedom or free will, this paper focuses on the distinction between fatalism, determinism, types of compatibilism, and libertarianism. Indian philosophers, by and large, are compatibilists, although some minor systems, such as Śākta Āgama, favor a type of libertarianism. From the Indian perspective the form of life of human beings has also been mentioned in the discussion of free will. Regarding metaphysical freedom, I discuss the views of the Bhagavad Gītā and Swami Vivekananda in Sect. III. K.C. Bhattacharyya, a neo-Advaita Vedāntin, has discussed degrees of freedom of the subject at several levels. According to him, spiritual progress lies in the progressive realization of the freedom of the subject. I compare his view with the classical Advaita concept of freedom. I have also addressed the question of whether freedom from suffering can be realized at social and global levels. In this context I have mentioned some of the interpretations of the great saying ‘I am Brahman,’ and how freedom can be realized at the global level by using the Advaita concept of ‘oneness.’

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Pragmatic pluralism as discussed by the authors argues for situated and localized forms of cooperation between state and non-state actors, particularly religious groups and organizations, that may not share the secular, juridical understandings of rights, persons, and obligations common to contemporary cosmopolitan theory.
Abstract: Pragmatic pluralism denotes a particular approach to problems of international human rights and protections that departs from conventional cosmopolitan approaches. Pragmatic pluralism argues for situated and localized forms of cooperation between state and non-state actors, particularly religious groups and organizations, that may not share the secular, juridical understandings of rights, persons, and obligations common to contemporary cosmopolitan theory. A resource for the development of such a model of pragmatic pluralism can be found in the work of Hannah Arendt. Arendt's early dissertation "Love and Saint Augustine" affords a model of religious community and obligation that can be read productively alongside her later political writings. The possibilities inherent in a cooperative reading of these two parts of her work can be illustrated in relation to an issue of particular concern to cosmopolitan theorists: the international refugee crisis.

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Sep 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Camus' engagement with nihilism through its two major modalities: with respect to the individual and the question of suicide in The Myth of Sisyphus as discussed by the authors, and the collective and the questions of murder in The Rebel.
Abstract: Camus published an essay entitled ‘Nietzsche and Nihilism,’ which was later incorporated into The Rebel. Camus' aim was to assess Nietzsche's response to the problem of nihilism. My aim is to do the same with Camus. The paper explores Camus' engagement with nihilism through its two major modalities: with respect to the individual and the question of suicide in The Myth of Sisyphus, and with respect to the collective and the question of murder in The Rebel. While a Nietzschean influence thoroughly suffuses both books, it is in the second that Camus' most explicit, and most critical, engagement with the German philosopher takes place. The crux of Camus' critique of Nietzsche is that the absolute affirmation of existence he proposes as a response to nihilism cannot say ‘no’ to murder. In the terms of Camus' discussion in The Rebel, Nietzsche's philosophy is thus culpable in the straying of rebellion from its own foundations and its slide into bloody revolution. First, the paper argues that Camus' criticisms of Nietzsche are misplaced. Camus focuses his analysis on sections of the problematic text The Will to Power and misses important sections of Nietzsche's published texts which in fact support the condemnation of revolution which is the project of The Rebel. However, the paper argues that Camus moves beyond Nietzsche in radically democratizing the response to nihilism. While Nietzsche's hopes for the creation of meaning are focused on exceptional individuals, Camus insists that any response to nihilism needs to be accessible to the average person. Such a move is laudable, but it raises a number of questions and challenges regarding the type of problem nihilism is, and how these might be addressed.

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Feb 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, a cosmotheandrisation of human rights in Africa is presented, where three levels of horizontal and vertical relationship guarantee the respect for human rights: cosmos "earth", theos "God" and anthropos "human".
Abstract: The notion of human rights is highly controversial and contested in modern scholarship. However, human rights have been defined as ‘the rational basis… for a justified demand.’ What constitutes demand should be understood as that which is different from favor or privilege but one's due, free from racial, religious, gender, political inclinations. But since rights are basic due to the fact that they are necessary for the enjoyment of something else, we are poised to examine it from the pre-figurative, configurative and post-figurative stages of development in Africa. This enterprise anchors on the belief in cosmotheandrisation of human rights in Africa: cosmos ‘earth’, theos ‘God’ and anthropos ‘human’. These three levels of horizontal and vertical relationship guarantee the respect for human rights in traditional Africa. Through this approach, this enterprise shows that the positive approach to human rights is majorly declarative without corresponding pragmatic manifestation.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The authors argue that theists are extremely well-situated with respect to developing meta-ethical accounts that qualify as "robust" versions of moral realism, and argue that there are good theoretical reasons for theistic philosophers to seek to develop meta ethical accounts that ground moral facts in facts about God.
Abstract: In this paper, I argue that theists are extremely well-situated with respect to developing metaethical accounts that qualify as ‘robust’ versions of moral realism. In the first part of the essay, a number of metaethical desiderata are identified. In the second part, theistic strategies for accommodating those desiderata are explained and defended. The upshot is that, contrary to the received philosophical wisdom, there are good theoretical reasons for theistic philosophers to seek to develop metaethical accounts that ground moral facts in facts about God.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: Sider argues that a binary afterlife is inconsistent with a proportionally just God because no just criterion for placing persons in such an afterlife exists as mentioned in this paper, and he provides a possible account whereby God can remain proportionally fair and allow binary afterlife.
Abstract: Ted Sider argues that a binary afterlife is inconsistent with a proportionally just God because no just criterion for placing persons in such an afterlife exists I provide a possible account whereby God can remain proportionally just and allow a binary afterlife On my account, there is some maximum amount of people God can allow into Heaven without sacrificing some greater good God gives to all people at least their due but chooses to allow some who do not deserve Heaven to enter out of grace Although this model implies a precise cutoff between those who enter Heaven and those who do not, I have argued that there is a precise point where God best serves justice and some greater good Although God’s actions may appear arbitrary and ‘whimsically generous,’ it is merely because we are ignorant of the precise cutoff point that best serves his purposes

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Jun 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the philosophical and theological significance of the phenomenological analysis of Christian faith offered by the early Heidegger, and argue that this exclusion leaves room for a form of philosophical reflection upon the nature of faith and discourse concerning God, namely for a philosophy of religion in a phenomenological mode.
Abstract: This essay considers the philosophical and theological significance of the phenomenological analysis of Christian faith offered by the early Heidegger. It shows, first, that Heidegger poses a radical and controversial challenge to philosophers by calling them to do without God in an unfettered pursuit of the question of being (through his ‘destruction of onto-theology’); and, second, that this exclusion nonetheless leaves room for a form of philosophical reflection upon the nature of faith and discourse concerning God, namely for a philosophy of religion in a phenomenological mode (as exemplified most clearly in Heidegger’s 1920/21 lectures on the phenomenology of religious life). However, it is argued that the theological roots of Heidegger’s own phenomenological analyses subvert his frequently asserted claim concerning the incompatibility of Christian faith and philosophical inquiry.

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The authors discuss the status of the catchphrase with reference to ‘He's fallen in da water!’ from the Goon Show, which is a meta-humor that draws attention to the contrivance of the story.
Abstract: I outline Robert Solomon’s Inferiority theory of humor, which he illustrated by reference to the Three Stooges and contrasted with the Superiority, Incongruity, and Relief theories. And I discuss the status of the catchphrase with reference to ‘He’s fallen in da water!’ from the Goon Show. Unlike Bob, I don’t think the catchphrase always operates as a set-up, because it is not always heralded or predictable. The funny catchphrase involves a form of meta-humor that draws attention to the contrivance of the story.


Journal ArticleDOI
30 Jun 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The Filosofia for Ninas and Ninos (FpNN) as mentioned in this paper is a programa of the University of Montclair, United States of America, USA.
Abstract: El texto presenta una breve introduccion acerca de lo que es la Filosofia para Ninas y Ninos (FpNN) a partir de las mismas novelas base del programa desarrollado por Matthew Lipman y un grupo interdisciplinario que, desde finales de los anos setenta, en la Universidad de Montclair, en Estados Unidos, proponen un sistema educativo que une la filosofia pragmatista de Jhon Dewey a la pedagogia de la liberacion de Freire y al constructivismo de Piaget para lograr desarrollar en ninos y jovenes actitudes filosoficas como: pensar por uno mismo y el manejo de la investigacion filosofica como elementos que facilitan su proceso de maduracion etico, moral y civico. Se presenta en este trabajo preguntas que indagan los conceptos de ‘filosofia’, ‘nina/o’, ‘pensar por si mismo’; su tratamiento nos dara una imagen de lo que constituye la propuesta desde los mismos relatos del programa; tambien se comenta el rol del tutor y un breve estado de la situacion de FpNN en Ecuador con una bibliografia minima.

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Jul 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an attempt to mediate from my Asian background and in specific terms using the Buddhist perspectives on emotion studies, to find answers, a subject on which I have worked over several decades.
Abstract: The work ‘Thinking and Feeling’ edited by Robert C. Solomon may be considered as a landmark in the history of the philosophy of the emotions. The work also has assembled together some of the best minds in the Anglo American Traditions. The central focus in this work is to mediate between the physiological arousal theories of emotions and the cognitive appraisal theories of emotions. My article is an attempt to mediate from my Asian background and in specific terms using the Buddhist perspectives on emotion studies, to find answers, a subject on which I have worked over several decades. The Buddha has discouraged people in attempting to find ultimate answers to the body- mind relationships, but use pragmatic and practical perspectives for a two way interactionism. Thus, in the Buddhist analysis the mental and the cognitive, as well as bodily and the physiological are recognised, thus giving room for a holistic understanding of emotions concepts. In fact, Buddhism expects the body, feelings, perceptions, interpretations, and evaluations as facets of emotion concepts. The second point is the domination of the metaphor of reasons as the charioteer in managing unruly emotions in the West. But Buddhism introduces the factor of ‘mindfulness’ as an important ally in the management of emotions. My personal work in therapy and counselling has helped me to explore new dimensions for managing emotions through mindfulness practice.

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Aug 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The authors argue for a formative and not simply abstract, aspect to the philosophy of religion by attending to the practices of writing employed in Soren Kierkegaard's pseudonymous work Repetition.
Abstract: This essay argues for a formative, and not simply abstract, aspect to the philosophy of religion by attending to the practices of writing employed in Soren Kierkegaard’s pseudonymous work Repetition. By locating this text within an ethical tradition that focuses upon the practices that form subjects, rather than simply the formulation of a theory, its seemingly literary performances can be viewed as exercises. In particular, this text deploys and transforms the Stoic practices of self writing, in the form of keeping notebooks and letter writing, so as to cultivate capabilities. This indirect ethical instruction does not, however, lead to the formation of autonomous ethical subjects, but to the cultivation of capabilities that are only possible in the relational space of vulnerability, service and dependence.


Journal ArticleDOI
02 Aug 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the analysis of Socrates' words and speeches, which can be found in authentic sources such as some of Plato's writings, to prove the truth of his claim that he had the gift of prophecy.
Abstract: Everybody acknowledges the importance of Socrates’ role and influence on the history of philosophy, as well as on the culture of humanity. He is also considered to be the first martyr of virtue and wisdom in human history. In spite of this, even though most Western commentators recognize the elevated meanings and high level of Socratic wisdom, they refuse to consider it to have a supra-human source and to be divine prophecy. In this article and through the analysis of Socrates’ words and speeches, which can be found in authentic sources such as some of Plato’s writings, the author aims to prove the truth of Socrates’ claim according to which he had the gift of prophecy. By putting together rational proofs and historical clues from his life, we will underline the veracity of such a claim. A part of the article will be dedicated to underlining the fact that our reasoning is based on authentic and historical references of Socrates’ speeches, which are mainly mentioned in Plato’s Apology. By quoting the main and most important commentators’ views in this field, we will therefore endeavor to show that there is a sort of general consensus among most commentators to consider this treatise to be an historical document. The importance as well as main outcome of this article is that if we accept this theory, the general outlook of the history of philosophy will change radically. In addition, the claim that wisdom has a divine source, which is mentioned repeatedly in the content of divine wise men’s words and in some Islamic traditions, will be confirmed. Moreover, the link between spiritual truths and human reasoning will be corroborated and underlined.

Journal ArticleDOI
Russell Grigg1
21 Oct 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The fiftieth anniversary of Camus' death in 2010 was largely ignored in his native Algeria as mentioned in this paper, reflecting the critical response to Camus’ writings that regards him as a colonialist writer and apologist for the French domination of Algeria.
Abstract: The fiftieth anniversary of Camus’ death in 2010 was largely ignored in his native Algeria, reflecting the critical response to Camus’ writings that regards him as a colonialist writer and apologist for the French domination of his native Algeria This critique also claims that Camus’ colonial attitudes are hidden and reinforced by a European attitude that sees him as dealing first and foremost with universal questions about the human predicament and existential isolation However, Camus’ journalism shows an Algerian closely identified with the destiny of all the peoples of Algeria, and his novel The Outsider contains sufficient indications that, whatever its existential importance, in the concrete situation of Camus’ Algeria the Arab has the precise status of outsider

Journal ArticleDOI
Jeremy Gwiazda1
26 Apr 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that Davis's separationist position, wherein those who remain eternally apart from God do so by choice, is internally contradictory in that it leads to universalism.
Abstract: In this brief reply to Stephen Davis, I argue that Davis’s separationist position, wherein those who remain eternally apart from God do so by choice, is internally contradictory in that it leads to universalism.

Journal ArticleDOI
21 May 2011-Sophia
TL;DR: The authors developed a new and expanded interpretation of the typology exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism to better understand and compare the most common views of religious diversity found not only in Christianity, but also in Buddhism and other religions.
Abstract: This article develops a new and expanded interpretation of the typology exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism. The proposal refines the categories of what was originally a Christian typology in order to provide a truly cross-cultural and interreligious framework to better understand and compare the most common views of religious diversity found not only in Christianity, but also in Buddhism and other religions. Although building upon Schmidt-Leukel's logical reinterpretation of the typology, the article substantially modifies his framework and understands the typology, not as a comprehensive classification of possible attitudes toward other religions, but rather as an open-ended framework to clarify the nature of the most common theologies of religions that exist in reality. The new interpretation provides a more precise definition of inclusivism that does not conflate inclusivism with the affirmation of a singular maximum, thus distinguishing between absolutistic and non-absolutistic forms of inclusivism. The new interpretation introduces an intermediate position between inclusivism and pluralism called pluralistic inclusivism. The article challenges David Ray Griffin's concept of generic pluralism and proposes a new understanding of pluralism indebted to Raimundo Panikkar.