scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

A forward-looking measure of the stock of human capital in New Zealand

TLDR
In this paper, the authors modify the lifetime labour income approach outlined by Jorgenson and Fraumeni (The Measurement of Savings, Investment and Wealth, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 227-282; Output Measurement in the Services Sector, Chicago IL, UChicago Press, 1992, pp 303-338) to estimate the monetary value of the human capital stock for New Zealand.
Abstract
Human capital is increasingly believed to play an important role in the growth process; however, adequately measuring its stock remains controversial. Because the estimated impact that human capital has on economic growth is sensitive to the measures or proxies of human capital, accurate and consistent measures are needed. While many measures of human capital have been developed, most rely on some proxy of educational experience and are thus plagued with limitations. In this study, we modify the lifetime labour income approach outlined by Jorgenson and Fraumeni (The Measurement of Savings, Investment and Wealth, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 227–282; Output Measurement in the Services Sector, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 303–338) to estimate the monetary value of the human capital stock for New Zealand. Based on data from the New Zealand Census of Population, we find that the country's working human capital grew by half between 1981 and 2001, mostly due to the rise in employment level. This stock of human capital was also well over double that of physical capital in all the census years studied.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Specifying human capital

TL;DR: A review of the measures of the stock of human capital used in empirical growth research as discussed by the authors reveals that human capital is mostly poorly proxied, and the simple use of the most common proxy, average years of schooling, misspecifies therelationship between education and human capital.
Journal Article

The New Growth Evidence

TL;DR: This paper surveys the recent empirical literature on economic growth, starting with a discussion of stylized facts, data problems, and statistical methods and concludes that efficiency has grown at different rates across countries, casting doubt on neoclassical models in which technology is a public good.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost- and income-based measures of human capital

TL;DR: In this article, three general approaches to measure human capital are identified; cost-based, income-based and educational stock-based; and some new results for New Zealand based upon their approach are also presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human capital measurement: a survey

TL;DR: In this article, two main methods for estimating the value of the stock of human capital (henceforth human capital) are presented, the retrospective and prospective one, with a review of the models proposed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a fully specified model of long-run growth in which knowledge is assumed to be an input in production that has increasing marginal productivity, which is essentially a competitive equilibrium model with endogenous technological change.
Posted Content

International Data on Educational Attainment Updates and Implications

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a data set that improves the measurement of educational attainment for a broad group of countries, and extended their previous estimates for the population over age 15 and over age 25 up to 1995 and provided projections for 2000.
Journal ArticleDOI

Schultz (T. W.). Investment in Human Capital

John Vaizey
- 01 Jun 1972 - 
Journal ArticleDOI

The New Growth Evidence

TL;DR: The authors surveys the recent empirical literature on economic growth, starting with a discussion of stylized facts, data problems, and statistical methods and concludes that efficiency has grown at different rates across countries, casting doubt on neoclassical models in which technology is a public good.