A monograph of the genus Taphrina
About:
This article is published in University of Kansas science bulletin.The article was published on 1949-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 86 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Taphrina & Genus.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Microcycle conidiation — A review
TL;DR: In the laboratory various factors, but especially temperature, can induce the microcycle condition in such fungi as Aspergillus niger, Penicillium and Neurospora crassa, providing a useful tool for research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Molecular systematics of the dimorphic ascomycete genus Taphrina.
TL;DR: Sequencing results confirmed the monophyly of the genus Taphrina Fries and the combined analysis of the two methods corroborated, in most cases, separation of species defined on the basis of conventional criteria, but genetic heterogeneity was found within some species and conspecificity was suggested for strains that have been deemed to represent distinct species.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fungal diseases in forest nurseries in Finland.
TL;DR: Growers are encouraged to use cultural and integrated pest management techniques such as better nursery hygiene, including removing plant debris in nursery growing areas and hot water washing of containers plus removal of diseased, spore-producing seedlings and trees around the nursery.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evolutionary relationships of members of the genera Taphrina, Protomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, and related taxa within the archiascomycetes: Integrated analysis of genotypic and phenotypic characters
Wellyzar Sjamsuridza,Yoshito Tajiri,Hiromi Nishida,Ta Bich Thuan,Hiroko Kawasaki,Aiko Hirata,Akira Yokota,Junta Sugiyama +7 more
TL;DR: All the trees show that, within the archiascomycete lineage, 11 of the 14Taphrina species and the 2Protomyces species are monophyletic, and the evidence from molecular and phenotypic characters such as cell wall sugar composition, ubiquinone, cell wall ultrastructure, and mode of conidium ontogeny, strongly suggests that ‘T’.39 should be excluded from the archiacomyCete lineage.