Open AccessBook
Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem-Solving
Yun Peng,James A. Reggia +1 more
TLDR
This paper presents a meta-model for parallel processing for Diagnostic Problem-Solving using the probabilistic Causal Model and a parallel processing model based on the Parsimonious Covering Theory.Abstract:
Contents: Abduction and Diagnostic Inference.- Computational Models for Diagnostic Problem Solving.- Basics of Parsimonious Covering Theory.- Probabilistic Causal Model.- Diagnostic Strategies in the Probabilistic Causal Model.- Causal Chaining.- Parallel Processing for Diagnostic Problem-Solving.- Conclusion.- Bibliography.- Index.read more
Citations
More filters
Book
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
TL;DR: This landmark text takes the central concepts of knowledge representation developed over the last 50 years and illustrates them in a lucid and compelling way, and offers the first true synthesis of the field in over a decade.
Journal ArticleDOI
Probabilistic Horn abduction and Bayesian networks
TL;DR: It is shown how any probabilistic knowledge representable in a discrete Bayesian belief network can be represented in this framework, and it is argued that it is better to invent new hypotheses to explain dependence rather than having to worry about dependence in the language.
Journal ArticleDOI
The complexity of logic-based abduction
Thomas Eiter,Georg Gottlob +1 more
TL;DR: It is shown that with the most basic forms of abduction the relevant decision problems are complete for complexity classes at the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, while the use of prioritization raises the complexity to the third level in certain cases.
BookDOI
Complex Problem Solving : The European Perspective
Peter A. Frensch,Joachim Funke +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a general framework for the study of complex problem-solving, including definitions, Traditions, and a General Framework for Understanding Complex Problem-Solving.
Journal ArticleDOI
Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.
TL;DR: This article showed that diagnostic and predictive reasoning are not even symmetrical, and that cue competition occurs among multiple possible causes during predictive learning, while multiple possible effects need not compete during diagnostic learning.