scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Accuracy of references in the doctoral theses in library and information science submitted to Banasthali Vidyapith

TLDR
In this article, a study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of references in the fourteen Ph.D. theses in Library and Information Science (LIS) submitted to Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, India.
Abstract
The study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of references in the fourteen Ph.D. theses in Library and Information Science (LIS) submitted to Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, India. One thousand seven hundred and twenty-one (1721) journal references were checked thoroughly dividing them into seven bibliographic elements, i.e. name of the author(s), article title, journal title, year, volume number, issue number, and pages (both first and last page). These components were checked from the original journal articles. Results show that 22.08% (380) references in LIS theses had no errors, while 77.92% (1341) references contained errors. In 1341 faulty references, a sum of 2869 errors was observed, out of which 1231 were major and 1638 were minor errors. The reference accuracy rate for LIS theses ranged from 0% to 42.77%. The average number of errors in references was 1.67. The research findings indicate that citation instruction in Pre-PhD. Programme is strongly required to promote better citation behaviour.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust, but verify : the accuracy of references in four anesthesia journals

TL;DR: The citation error rate of anesthesia journals is similar to that reported in other specialties, where error rates ranging from 38% to 54% have been documented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reference List Accuracy in Social Work Journals

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the citation errors in the reference lists of five social work journals and found that 41.2% of the citations contained at least one citation error.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Survey of Reference Accuracy in Five National Dental Journals

TL;DR: The results of this survey showed that nearly half of the references reviewed were inaccurate, with a total of 248 errors within the incorrect group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reference Errors in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Literature.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors determined the prevalence of quotation and citation errors in Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) journals and how they have changed over time.
Journal Article

Citation errors in library literature: a study of five library science journals

TL;DR: There is a need for greater awareness among LIS professionals of keeping their citations error free, and other aspects of the subject for further study are suggested.
Related Papers (5)