scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Adapting to Change: Teacher Perceptions of Implementing the Common Core State Standards.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) as mentioned in this paper is a set of state standards that are based on the Common Core International Journal of Instruction (CJIOC) curriculum.
Abstract
Review of Literature With each generation of students comes a change in educational practices. In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka declared the unconstitutionality of separate public schools for White and Black students. In 1975, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) granted students with disabilities equal opportunities for free public education. In 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act sought to raise standards for all students while assessing students' attainment of those standards. Many educational changes have been looked at with admiration as a much-needed change in education. Nevertheless, others have been viewed with less than welcoming sentiments. The latest change in the educational system is the adoption of the Common Core State Standards--also known as CCSS or the Common Core--which has received much ambiguous attention by teachers, administrators, and parents. The Common Core State Standards are a relatively new concept in education. In 2009, a group of state officials, members of the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers, designed "real-world learning goals" that would prepare students for college, career, and beyond (CCSSC, 2015). States began reviewing the standards in 2011, and in 2013, 45 states had adopted the Common Core standards. Since that time, 2 states have withdrawn their support. Porter, McMaken, Hwang, and Yang (2011) assert that having this common curriculum across states would allow for consistent expectations, focus, efficiency, and computerized assessments. However, in their comprehensive analysis of the Common Core standards at their implementation in 2010, they report a shift in "cognitive demands" on students. The researchers analyzed the data through Surveys of Enacted Curriculum (SEC), "a two-dimensional framework defining content at the intersections of topics and cognitive demands" (Porter et al., 2011, p. 104). They also note that while the Common Core math standards are "somewhat more focused," the same cannot be said for the English language arts and reading standards; and the Common Core standards are different from what many teachers report they are currently teaching. Some state standards are more focused than the Common Core standards while others are less focused. Despite these findings, 43 states are still involved with Common Core and push to assess students based on its standards. While ACT (2012) points out factors that have helped some schools succeed with Common Core (e.g., high expectations, formative assessments, strong relationships between students and their teachers, etc.), many parents argue that the standards are taking the focus away from what is important, especially in the early grades (Gallagher, 2013). Two mothers in Indiana, for example, noticed their elementary children's changing math homework. Instead of simple addition and subtraction problems, students were being asked divergent questions, such as "How do you know?" (Gallagher, 2013). Just as parents noticed and complained about the changes in their children's homework, teachers are also noticing but are the ones being required to implement the change. Educational Change Change in any industry is inevitable. In education, change comes more frequently than in most other arenas. In education, veteran teachers are often criticized for being hesitant to implement the latest modification in the education system. However, although teachers are generally the individuals responsible for implementing changes, they are rarely given the opportunity to provide input into the development of such changes (Sikes, 1992). Many teachers fear change, or have an aversion to it, because of its moral implications. Some teachers worry that the newest rendition of the system "will not work or will make matters worse" (Fullan & Hargreaves, 1992, p. 5). However, many teachers realize that these changes are necessary because research constantly shows many first-year college students are unprepared for undergraduate work and need remediation (Cheng, 2012). …

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Technology Integration on Middle School Math Proficiency: A Multiple Linear Regression Study

TL;DR: The authors used hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis to quantify the contribution of Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition to MAP Growth in math for 644 students taught by eight teachers across 36 class sections at a single Indiana middle school.

The Impact of Instructional Technology on Lesson Effectiveness and Obstacles to Incorporating Technology Into Lesson Design as Perceived by Elementary School Teachers

Sarah Loring
TL;DR: For example, the authors used portable die cutters to teach visualization and mathematics to young children as part of a project located at the University of Virginia, where students created 2-D cutouts that were then die-cut and changed into 3-D figures.

The Pedagogical Impacts of the Common Core State Standards on Elementary Mathematics Teachers of the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing

TL;DR: This article explored the intersection of the Common Core State Standards and the field of Deaf Education, specifically the impact of the common core on the pedagogy of elementary mathematics teachers of the deaf and hard-of-hearing.
Journal ArticleDOI

National Curriculum for Physical Education in the United States.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the relevance and feasibility of a uniform curriculum in physical education and propose a more advanced curriculum framework with clear guidance for P-12 curricula and pedagogical practices to promote system-wide changes in school-based physical education.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physical Education Teacher Education Leaders' Perceptions on a National Curriculum in Physical Education.

TL;DR: Themes indicated that nationalizing the curriculum has the potential to offer explicit educational goals, substantial pedagogical guidelines, and valid assessments, but the majority of participants were opposed because of the inflexibility of such a system in the culturally and geographically diverse school contexts across the US.