scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Ambidextrous Organizations. A Multiple-Level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation and Performance

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, a multi-level framework was developed to explore how ambidextrous organizations can successfully cope with both exploratory and exploitative innovations across organizational units, and it was shown that organizational units require different types of combinative capabilities to influence their absorptive capacity.
Abstract
textBalancing and synchronizing exploration and exploitation is fundamental to the competitive success of firms in dynamic environments. Despite the importance of reconciling exploration and exploitation within organizations, however, relatively little empirical research has examined this challenge facing numerous organizations. This study develops a multi-level framework and explores how ambidextrous organizations can successfully cope with both types of innovations across organizational units. It not only examines performance implications of organizational ambidexterity, but also investigates how organizational units develop exploratory and exploitative innovations. Results indicate that the most effective ambidextrous organizations balance exploratory and exploitative innovation by separating both types of activities in different organizational units. Moreover, findings demonstrate that organizational units require different types of combinative capabilities to influence their absorptive capacity, and subsequently, their exploratory and exploitative innovations.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

The Re-Emergence of Foreign Banks in Shanghai: An Ecological Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, a gedetailleerde analysis of the opkomende populatie van buitenlandse banken in Shanghai is presented, and the concurrentie tussen deze banken der mate toeneemt dat het de toetrede van nieuwe bankens in Shanghai in de weg staat.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowing, Power and Materiality: A Critical Review and Reconceptualization of Absorptive Capacity

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the absorptive capacity (AC) construct should be interpreted in light of the possession and the practice perspectives of knowledge and power, and they suggest an interpretation of the construct that takes into account knowledge-power relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

Policy innovation in isolation?: Conditions for policy renewal by transition arenas and pilot projects

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe transition arenas and pilot projects from an innovation management perspective and evaluate their functioning by focusing on their approaches to two dilemmas: the dilemma between diversity and closedness within the innovation plans and the dilemma of the plan in relation to its context, the outside world.
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationship between organisational foresight and organisational ambidexterity

TL;DR: The relationship between foresight and ambidexterity is discussed in this article, where the authors propose a conceptual model that describes organisational foresight as a set of environmental scanning, strategic selection and integrating capabilities.
Related Papers (5)