scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study

TLDR
In an experiment comparing two-person bargaining and multiperson markets in Israel, Japan, United States, and Yugoslavia, market outcomes converged to equilibrium everywhere, with no payoff-relevant differences between countries.
Abstract
In an experiment comparing two-person bargaining and multiperson markets in Israel, Japan, the United States, and Yugoslavia, market outcomes converged to equilibrium everywhere, with no payoff-relevant differences between countries Bargaining outcomes were everywhere different from equilibrium predictions (both in agreements and in the substantial frequency of disagreements) and differences were observed between countries Because of the experimental design, the fact that the market behavior is the same in all countries supports the hypothesis that the observed differences are not due to differences in languages, currencies, or experimenters, but may tentatively be attributed to cultural differences Copyright 1991 by American Economic Association (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation

TL;DR: This article showed that if a fraction of the people exhibit inequality aversion, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those who punish, and they also showed that when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperations are maintained.
Journal ArticleDOI

ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition

TL;DR: The authors demonstrate that people are motivated by both their pecuniary payoff and their relative payoff standing, and demonstrate that a simple model, constructed on the premise that people were motivated by either their payoff or their relative standing, organizes a large and seemingly disparate set of laboratory observations as one consistent pattern, which explains observations from games where equity is thought to be a factor, such as ultimatum and dictator, games where reciprocity is played a role and games where competitive behavior is observed.
Posted Content

Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics

TL;DR: In this article, it is shown that every mutual-max or mutual-min Nash equilibrium is a fairness equilibrium, and that if payoffs are small, fairness equilibria are roughly the set of mutualmax and mutualmin outcomes; if payoff are large, fairness equilibrium are roughly a set of Nash equilibra.
Posted Content

The nature of human altruism

TL;DR: Current gene-based evolutionary theories cannot explain important patterns of human altruism, pointing towards the importance of both theories of cultural evolution as well as gene–culture co-evolution.
Posted ContentDOI

A Theory of Reciprocity

TL;DR: The theory takes into account that people evaluate the kindness of an action not only by its consequences but also by the intention underlying this action, and explains the relevant stylized facts of a wide range of experimental games.
References
More filters
Book

Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences

Sidney Siegel
TL;DR: This is the revision of the classic text in the field, adding two new chapters and thoroughly updating all others as discussed by the authors, and the original structure is retained, and the book continues to serve as a combined text/reference.
Journal ArticleDOI

An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

TL;DR: In this paper, the ultimatum bargaining games with two players and two stages were investigated. But the authors focused on situations with two agents and two stage bargaining games and only one agent has to decide and the set of outcomes is restricted to two results.
Posted Content

A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence

TL;DR: In this paper, the author postulates that bargainers behave as if they are negotiating over both "absolute" and "relative" money, where absolute money is measured by cash, relative money by the disparity between absolute measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ultimatum bargaining behavior : a survey and comparison of experimental results

TL;DR: In this article, the ultimatum bargaining games with more than just one round where, except for the final round, nonacceptance does not cause conflict but another round of ultrmatum bargainmg for a smaller cake.
Posted Content

An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining

TL;DR: In this article, a study of alternating offer bargaining with discounting was conducted and it was found that perfect equilibrium has little predictive power under the conventional assumption that bargainers' utility is measured by their monetary payoffs.
Related Papers (5)