scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Basel III: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?

TLDR
In this paper, the authors find that the costs of credit to low risk bank borrowers will be only moderately affected by the changes in bank balance sheets, but that there will be a reduction in availability and higher cost at the riskier end of the credit spectrum.
Abstract
Basel III will force banks to shift their business model from liability management, in which business decisions are made about asset volumes, with the financing found in short term wholesale markets as necessary, to asset management, in which asset volumes are constrained by the availability of funding. We find, contrary to what many have argued, that once there is a full adjustment, the costs of credit to low risk bank borrowers – the majority of customers – will be only moderately affected; but that there will a reduction in availability and higher cost at the riskier end of the credit spectrum. Alternative arrangements are therefore needed for financing of risky exposures if a fall in economic growth is to be avoided. In this context securitisation (broadly defined to include all forms of bank sponsored collateralised instrument, including covered bonds) will be of central importance. Re-establishing securitisation markets on a sounder footing appears essential, in order both to prevent a renewed credit contraction and to help prevent riskier borrowers from being cut off from credit. The shifts in bank balance sheets will also require substantial portfolio adjustments amongst long term institutional investors, from short term to long term debt and from debt to equity. The associated adjustment of both market prices and required returns can be accommodated but poses a substantial co-ordination problem and could take a long time. Finally the new liquidity rules could create new unintended systemic risks. In particular the proposed definition of eligible liquid assets is dangerously over-concentrated on government debt. The definition of should be broadened to give banks more scope to hold liquidity in the form of commercial claims; and central banks should clarify in what circumstances they will provide emergency liquidity assistance.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Capital and liquidity ratios and financial distress. Evidence from the European banking industry

TL;DR: In this paper, the relevance of both structural liquidity and capital ratios, as defined in Basel III, on banks' probability of failure was tested using a large bank-level dataset, and it was shown that the likelihood of failure and distress decreases with increased liquidity holdings, while capital ratios are significant only for large banks.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Good and Bad News about the New Liquidity Rules of Basel III in Western European Countries

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed characteristics and drivers of NSFR for a sample of 921 Western European banks between 1996 and 2010 and found that a majority of banks have historically not fulfilled NSFR minimum requirements, in particular larger and faster growing institutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers to innovation within large financial services firms: An in-depth study into disruptive and radical innovation projects at a bank

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore internal barriers that influence the effectiveness of projects within large financial services firms focussing on potentially disruptive and radical innovations (e.g., traditional risk-avoidance focus, and inertia caused by systems architecture).
Journal ArticleDOI

Finance, climate-change and radical uncertainty: Towards a precautionary approach to financial policy

TL;DR: In this paper, an alternative "precautionary" financial policy approach is proposed that offers an intellectual framework for legitimizing more ambitious financial policy interventions in the present to better deal with these long-term risks.
Journal ArticleDOI

The good and bad news about the new liquidity rules of Basel III in Western European countries

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed characteristics and drivers of NSFR for a sample of 921 Western European banks between 1996 and 2010 and found that a majority of banks have historically not fulfilled NSFR minimum requirements, in particular larger and faster growing institutions as well as banks also active in asset management and investment banking.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Expensive

TL;DR: The authors examine the pervasive view that "equity is expensive," which leads to claims that high capital requirements are costly for society and would affect credit markets adversely and find that arguments made to support this view are fallacious, irrelevant to the policy debate, or very weak.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimal Bank Capital

TL;DR: In this article, the authors report estimates of the long-run costs and benefits of having banks fund more of their assets with loss-absorbing capital, by which they mean equity rather than debt.

An Analysis of the Impact of 'Substantially Heightened' Capital Requirements on Large Financial Institutions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the impact of "substantially heightened" capital requirements on large financial institutions, and on their customers, and conclude that the frictions associated with raising new external equity finance are likely to be greater than the ongoing costs of holding equity on the balance sheet, implying that the new requirements should be phased in gradually.
Posted Content

Credit in the macroeconomy

Book

Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State

TL;DR: The authors examines the actions that governments have taken to cope with the economic and political consequences associated with the globalization of international finance, including the Third World debt crisis and the collapse of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI.
Related Papers (5)