scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Colony‐level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An inclusive fitness model on worker‐controlled sex investments in eusocial Hymenoptera is presented which expands the existing theory for random mating populations as formulated by Trivers and Hare (1976) and Benford (1978) and gives further quantitative predictions of the optimal sex ratio of relatedness‐asymmetry classes.
Abstract
We present an inclusive fitness model on worker-controlled sex investments in eusocial Hymenoptera which expands the existing theory for random mating populations as formulated by Trivers and Hare (1976) and Benford (1978). We assume that relatedness asymmetry is variable among colonies — owing to multiple mating, worker reproduction and polygyny — and that workers are able to assess the relatedness asymmetry in their own colony. A simple marginal value argument shows that “assessing” workers maximize their inclusive fitness by specializing on the production of the sex to which they are relatively more related than the average worker in the population is related to that sex. The model confirms our earlier verbal argument on this matter (Boomsma and Grafen, 1990) and gives further quantitative predictions of the optimal sex ratio of relatedness-asymmetry classes for both infinite and finite, random mating populations. It is shown that in large populations all but one of the relatedness-asymmetry classes should specialize on the production of one sex only. The remaining, balancing class is selected to compensate any bias induced by the other class(es) such that the population sex ratio reflects the relatedness asymmetry of that balancing class. In the absence of worker-reproduction, the sex ratio compensation by the balancing-class is generally close to 100%, unless the population is very small. In the Discussion we address explicitly the likelihood of our relatedness-assessment hypothesis and other assumptions made in the model. The relationship of our model with previous theory on sex allocation in eusocial Hymenoptera is worked out in the Appendix.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

TL;DR: It is concluded that post‐copulatory mechanisms provide a more reliable way of selecting a genetically compatible mate than pre-copulatory mate choice and that some of the best evidence for cryptic female choice by sperm selection is due to selection of more compatible sperm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.

TL;DR: The aim here is to address issues of semantic confusion that have arisen with research on the problem of cooperation, and to emphasize the need to distinguish between proximate (mechanism) and ultimate (survival value) explanations of behaviours.
Book

Foundations of social evolution

TL;DR: Demography and Kin Selection1148Reproductive Value1349Sex Allocation: Marginal Value17210Sex Allocating: Kin Selection19111Sex Allocations: Reproductive Value21412 as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conflict resolution in insect societies

TL;DR: Five major areas of reproductive conflict in insect societies are reviewed: (a) sex allocation, (b) queen rearing, (c) male rearing), (d) queen-worker caste fate, and (e) breeding conflicts among totipotent adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

Kin selection and social insects

TL;DR: Insect societies are macroscopic, and because they span the entire range from solitary individuals to essentially superorganismal colonies, they offer an accessible model for how such transitions can happen.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I

TL;DR: A genetical mathematical model is described which allows for interactions between relatives on one another's fitness and a quantity is found which incorporates the maximizing property of Darwinian fitness, named “inclusive fitness”.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection

R. C. Punnett
- 01 Oct 1930 - 
TL;DR: Although it is true that most text-books of genetics open with a chapter on biometry, closer inspection will reveal that this has little connexion with the body of the work, and that more often than not it is merely belated homage to a once fashionable study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parent-Offspring Conflict

TL;DR: In this paper, the parent-offspring conflict in sexually reproducing species is viewed from the standpoint of the offspring as well as the parent, and it is shown that conflict is an expected feature of such relations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Extraordinary Sex Ratios