scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Croatian Medical Journal Citation Score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Google Scholar shares a total of 42% citations returned by two others, more influential, bibliographic resources, but the list of unique citations in Google Scholar is predominantly journal based, but these journals are mainly of local character.
Abstract
AIM: To analyze the 2007 citation count of articles published by the Croatian Medical Journal in 2005-2006 based on data from the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. ----- METHODS: Web of Science and Scopus were searched for the articles published in 2005-2006. As all articles returned by Scopus were included in Web of Science, the latter list was the sample for further analysis. Total citation counts for each article on the list were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The overlap and unique citations were compared and analyzed. Proportions were compared using χ2-test. ----- RESULTS: Google Scholar returned the greatest proportion of articles with citations (45%), followed by Scopus (42%), and Web of Science (38%). Almost a half (49%) of articles had no citations and 11% had an equal number of identical citations in all 3 databases. The greatest overlap was found between Web of Science and Scopus (54%), followed by Scopus and Google Scholar (51%), and Web of Science and Google Scholar (44%). The greatest number of unique citations was found by Google Scholar (n=86). The majority of these citations (64%) came from journals, followed by books and PhD theses. Approximately 55% of all citing documents were full-text resources in open access. The language of citing documents was mostly English, but as many as 25 citing documents (29%) were in Chinese. ----- CONCLUSION: Google Scholar shares a total of 42% citations returned by two others, more influential, bibliographic resources. The list of unique citations in Google Scholar is predominantly journal based, but these journals are mainly of local character. Citations received by internationally recognized medical journals are crucial for increasing the visibility of small medical journals but Google Scholar may serve as an alternative bibliometric tool for an orientational citation insight.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison

TL;DR: It became evident during the verification process that the citation resources retrieved varied results, and the total citation counts indicated that ISI Web of Science (WOS) retrieved the same results as Google Scholar.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment

TL;DR: This article examined uncertainty research in impact assessment (IA) and the focus of attention of the IA scholarly literature and found that 90% of IA research addressing uncertainty focused on uncertainty in the practice of IA, including uncertainty in impact predictions, models and managing environmental impacts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases.

TL;DR: The originator of the idea, Eugene Garfield, formulated several critical points in bibliometrics that have shaped citation indexes, for example, libraries with limited funding should be selective about the journals they acquire and a bibliography should selectively cover 'high quality' sources.
Journal Article

Google Scholar as a source for citation and impact analysis for a non-ISI indexed medical journal

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined article productivity, the citations obtained by articles and calculated the impact factor of Medical Journal of Malaysia (MJM) published between 2004 and 2008, which is the oldest medical journal in Malaysia and the unit of analysis is 580 articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media: Personal publication lists as calibration parameters

TL;DR: The demonstrated calibration parameter shows the coverage of information services in the field of information science: Google Scholar covers a greater amount of publications than other academic citation databases and scientific social media.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

TL;DR: The content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar are compared and PubMed remains an optimal tool in biomedical electronic research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.

TL;DR: Comparing the citation count profiles of articles published in general medical journals among the citation databases of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar produced quantitatively and qualitatively different citation counts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science

TL;DR: The data indicate that the question of which tool provides the most complete set of citing literature may depend on the subject and publication year of a given article, and that any one of these three resources as the answer to all citation tracking needs is not identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web

TL;DR: A range of new applications such as Zotero, Mendeley, Mekentosj Papers, MyNCBI, CiteULike, Connotea, and HubMed that exploit the Web to make these digital libraries more personal, sociable, integrated, and accessible places are examined.
Journal Article

For free or for fee? Dilemma of small scientific journals.

TL;DR: The Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) has recently been approached by two major publishing companies and offered to become one of the journals in their group, but the editorial decision was to join neither of the publishers.
Related Papers (5)