scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Decentering the Regime: Ethnicity, Radicalism, and Democracy in Juchitán, Mexico

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, Jeffrey W. Rubin traces the history and rise to power of this grassroots movement, and describes a Juchitan that exists in substantial autonomy from the central Mexican government and Mexican nationalism, debunking the notion that a state and regime-centered approach to power can explain the politics of domination and resistance in Mexico.
Abstract
Since 1989 an indigenous political movement—the Coalition of Workers, Peasants, and Students of the Isthmus (COCEI)—has governed the southern Mexican city of Juchitan. In Decentering the Regime , Jeffrey W. Rubin examines this Zapotec Indian movement and shows how COCEI forged an unprecedented political and cultural path—overcoming oppression in the 1970s to achieve democracy in the 1990s. Rubin traces the history and rise to power of this grassroots movement, and describes a Juchitan that exists in substantial autonomy from the central Mexican government and Mexican nationalism—thereby debunking the notion that a state- and regime-centered approach to power can explain the politics of domination and resistance in Mexico. Employing an interdisciplinary approach, Rubin shows that the Juchitecos’ ability to organize and sustain a radical political movement grew out of a century-long history of negotiation of political rule. He argues that factors outside the realm of formal politics—such as ethnicity, language, gender, and religion—play an important part in the dynamics of regional political struggles and relationships of power. While offering a detailed view of the Zapotec community and its interactions, Rubin reconceptualizes democracy by considering the question of how meaningful autonomy, self-government, cultural expression, and material well-being can be forged out of violence and repression.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamics of Contention

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the role of contention in national disintegration and contention in the process of national mobilizations and their application in the context of national democratization, and conclude that "national disintegration, national disentanglement, and contention are the main causes of national disarray".
Journal ArticleDOI

Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore how subnational comparisons can expand and strengthen the methodological repertoire available to social science researchers and show that a focus on subnational units is an important tool for increasing the number of observations and for making controlled comparisons, it helps mitigate some of the characteristic limitations of a small-N research design.
Journal ArticleDOI

Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and Postliberal Challenge in Latin America

Deborah J. Yashar
- 01 Oct 1999 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take issue with the conceptual and analytical underpinnings of this literature by highlighting how new political institutions, rather than securing democratic politics, have in fact had a more checkered effect.
Book

Trust and Rule

TL;DR: In particular, democratic regimes cannot operate without substantial integration of trust networks into public politics as discussed by the authors, and they face a threat of de-democratization if major segments of the population withdraw their trust networks from public politics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Democracy and Human Development

TL;DR: In this paper, a series of causal pathways through which a country's level of democracy in a given year affects its level of human development and its stock of democracy over the past century is investigated.