scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Decision-Making in a Democracy : The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker

Robert A. Dahl
- pp 137-154
TLDR
The Supreme Court of the United States is also a political institution, an institution that is to say, for arriving at decisions on controversial questions of national policy, and it is this role that gives rise to the problem of the Court's existence in a political system ordinarily held to be democratic.
Abstract
Considered as a political system, democracy is a set of basic procedures for arriving at decisions. To Consider the Supreme Court of the United States Strictly as a legal institution is to underestimate its significance in the American political system. For it is also a political institution, an institution, that is to say, for arriving at decisions on controversial questions of national policy. Court must choose among controversial alternatives of public policy by appealing to at least some criteria of acceptability on questions of fact and value that cannot be found in or deduced from precedent, statute, and Constitution. It is in this sense that the Court is a national policy-maker, and it is this role that gives rise to the problem of the Court's existence in a political system ordinarily held to be democratic. Justices are typically men who, prior to appointment, have engaged in public life and have committed themselves publicly on the great questions of the day.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU

TL;DR: In this article, an empirical study focused on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which has long been at the center of theory development regarding the legalization of world politics and the rise of international courts, demonstrated a strong correlation between the CJEU's rulings and the political signals it receives, in a pattern that goes beyond legal merit, and that fits with the override mechanism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Backlash, Consensus, Legitimacy, or Polarization: The Effect of Same-Sex Marriage Policy on Mass Attitudes

TL;DR: In this article, the effects of judicial action and policy implementation on attitude change are investigated, and the previous literature indicates that attitudes may change, but there is some debate about its direction.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment

TL;DR: This paper found that respondents put high importance on the political leanings of potential US Supreme Court candidates, and that they evaluated potential US SC candidates using a novel, two-part conjoint experiment.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods

TL;DR: The authors found that people who first heard about the Court decisions on health care and immigration were more likely to support the Court's decisions, and that these effects were largest among people who received one-sided information.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Social Movement Turn in Law

TL;DR: The rise of social movements in US legal scholarship is a current response to an age-old problem in progressive legal thought: harnessing law for social change while maintaining a distinction between law and politics.