scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs

George B. Dantzig, +1 more
- 01 Feb 1960 - 
- Vol. 8, Iss: 1, pp 101-111
TLDR
A technique is presented for the decomposition of a linear program that permits the problem to be solved by alternate solutions of linear sub-programs representing its several parts and a coordinating program that is obtained from the parts by linear transformations.
Abstract
A technique is presented for the decomposition of a linear program that permits the problem to be solved by alternate solutions of linear sub-programs representing its several parts and a coordinating program that is obtained from the parts by linear transformations. The coordinating program generates at each cycle new objective forms for each part, and each part generates in turn from its optimal basic feasible solutions new activities columns for the interconnecting program. Viewed as an instance of a “generalized programming problem” whose columns are drawn freely from given convex sets, such a problem can be studied by an appropriate generalization of the duality theorem for linear programming, which permits a sharp distinction to be made between those constraints that pertain only to a part of the problem and those that connect its parts. This leads to a generalization of the Simplex Algorithm, for which the decomposition procedure becomes a special case. Besides holding promise for the efficient computation of large-scale systems, the principle yields a certain rationale for the “decentralized decision process” in the theory of the firm. Formally the prices generated by the coordinating program cause the manager of each part to look for a “pure” sub-program analogue of pure strategy in game theory, which he proposes to the coordinator as best he can do. The coordinator finds the optimum “mix” of pure sub-programs using new proposals and earlier ones consistent with over-all demands and supply, and thereby generates new prices that again generates new proposals by each of the parts, etc. The iterative process is finite.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On the minimum label spanning tree problem

TL;DR: An approximation algorithm with logarithmic performance guarantee is presented and hardness results show that the Minimum Label Spanning Tree Problem cannot be approximated within a constant factor.
Journal ArticleDOI

About Lagrangian Methods in Integer Optimization

TL;DR: The importance of the availability of primal information produced by the Lagrangian dual within both exact and approximate approaches to the original (ILP) is elaborate, using three optimization problems with different structure to illustrate some of the main points.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hierarchical design of an integrated production and 2-echelon distribution system

TL;DR: The method of Lagrangean relaxation is used to decouple the imbedded distribution and production subproblems, and subgradient optimization is implemented to coordinate the information flow between these in a hierarchical manner.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carsharing: Dynamic Decision-Making Problem for Vehicle Allocation

TL;DR: In this paper, a multistage stochastic linear integer model with recourse is formulated that can account for system uncertainties such as carsharing demand variation, which is used to solve the carharing dynamic vehicle allocation problem.
Journal ArticleDOI

A column generation approach for the split delivery vehicle routing problem

TL;DR: This article presents a branch‐and‐price‐and-cut method for the solution of the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP), and solves to optimality instances with larger size with respect to previous approaches, find new best solutions to several benchmark instances and reduce the optimality gap on most of the benchmark instances.