scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners

TLDR
In this paper, the authors present theoretical and empirical motivation for a learning progression for scientific modeling that aims to make the practice accessible and meaningful for learners, including the elements of the practice (constructing, using, evaluating, and revising scientific models) and the metaknowledge that guides and motivates the practice.
Abstract
Modeling is a core practice in science and a central part of scientific literacy. We present theoretical and empirical motivation for a learning progression for scientific modeling that aims to make the practice accessible and meaningful for learners. We define scientific modeling as including the elements of the practice (constructing, using, evaluating, and revising scientific models) and the metaknowledge that guides and motivates the practice (e.g., understanding the nature and purpose of models). Our learning progression for scientific modeling includes two dimensions that combine metaknowledge and elements of practice—scientific models as tools for predicting and explaining, and models change as understanding improves. We describe levels of progress along these two dimensions of our progression and illustrate them with classroom examples from 5th and 6th graders engaged in modeling. Our illustrations indicate that both groups of learners productively engaged in constructing and revising increasingly accurate models that included powerful explanatory mechanisms, and applied these models to make predictions for closely related phenomena. Furthermore, we show how students engaged in modeling practices move along levels of this progression. In particular, students moved from illustrative to explanatory models, and developed increasingly sophisticated views of the explanatory nature of models, shifting from models as correct or incorrect to models as encompassing explanations for multiple aspects of a target phenomenon. They also developed more nuanced reasons to revise models. Finally, we present challenges for learners in modeling practices—such as understanding how constructing a model can aid their own sensemaking, and seeing model building as a way to generate new knowledge rather than represent what they have already learned. 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 46: 632-654, 2009

read more

Citations
More filters

A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas

David Gillam
TL;DR: In this article, a Mars Exploration Program lesson was prepared by Arizona State University's Mars Education Program, under contract to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology.

Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in

TL;DR: The National Research Council's Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER) report (National Research Council, 2012) captures the state-of-theart advances in our understanding of engineering and science student learning and highlights commonalities with other science-based education research programs.

Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering.

TL;DR: The National Research Council's Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER) report (National Research Council, 2012) captures the state-of-theart advances in our understanding of engineering and science student learning and highlights commonalities with other science-based education research programs as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts

TL;DR: In this paper, a learning progression for scientific argumentation is described to understand both students' work and the ways in which the instructional environment can support students in that practice, and the learning progression describes three dimensions: instructional context, argumentative product, and argumentative process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Benchmarks for Science Literacy: a review symposium∗

TL;DR: The Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford (1993), pp. 448, $21.95 (pbk), ISBN 0−19−508986−3 as mentioned in this paper.
References
More filters

Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through 8th grade: National Research Council, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education

TL;DR: Taking Science to School as mentioned in this paper provides a comprehensive view of what we know about teaching and learning science from kindergarten through eighth grade, focusing on a broad range of questions, including when children begin to learn about science and how to do science.
Book

Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades k-8

TL;DR: Taking Science to School as discussed by the authors provides a comprehensive picture of what we know about teaching and learning science from kindergarten through eighth grade by looking at a broad range of questions, this book provides a basic foundation for guiding science teaching and supporting students in their learning.
Book

Constructing Measures : An Item Response Modeling Approach

TL;DR: Constructing Measures introduces a way to understand the advantages and disadvantages of measurement instruments, how to use such instruments, and how to apply these methods to develop new instruments or adapt old ones.
Journal ArticleDOI

"Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics

TL;DR: This article focused on the distinction in argumentation discourse between "doing science" vs. "doing school" or "doing the lesson" during a high school genetics instructional sequence, and used Toulmin's argument pattern as a tool for the analysis of students' con- versation and other frames were used for analyzing other dimensions of student's dialogue.
Related Papers (5)