Discovery of Ghost Cavities in the X-Ray Atmosphere of Abell 2597
read more
Citations
Galactic Winds
Heating Hot Atmospheres with Active Galactic Nuclei
A Systematic Study of Radio-induced X-Ray Cavities in Clusters, Groups, and Galaxies
What Shapes the Luminosity Function of Galaxies
Heating Hot Atmospheres with Active Galactic Nuclei
References
Evolution of buoyant bubbles in M87
Chandra X-Ray Observations of the Hydra A Cluster: An Interaction between the Radio Source and the X-Ray-emitting Gas
Chandra imaging of the complex X-ray core of the Perseus cluster
A New Radio - X-Ray Probe of Galaxy Cluster Magnetic Fields
A New Radio-X-Ray Probe of Galaxy Cluster Magnetic Fields
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. How many bubbles are produced in a cluster?
The energy deposited by cavities into the ICM in the form of magnetic fields, cosmic rays, and heat over the life of the cluster is 1060–1061 ergs, assuming the CDG produces between 10 and 100 bubbles over its lifetime.
Q3. What is the effect of bulk lifting of cooling material out of cluster cores?
bulk lifting of cooling material out of cluster cores where it will expand, mix with ambient gas, and cool less efficiently can assist in reducing the deposition of cooled gas without the direct introduction of heat.
Q4. What is the effect of the X-ray emission from the cavities on the gas?
Since the cavities have a lower gas density than their surroundings, they should behave like bubbles in water and rise buoyantly in the intracluster medium (ICM; McNamara et al. 2000b; Churazov et al. 2001).
Q5. What is the effect of the deposited field on the cooling flow?
If a significant fraction of the 1060–1061 ergs of energy emerging from CDGs alone were deposited as magnetic field in the inner 100 kpc of clusters, the implied field strengths of ∼5–50 mG would be consistent with the field strengths observed in the cores of cooling flow clusters (Ge & Owen 1993).
Q6. What is the significance of the physics of clusters?
clusters are magnetized (Clarke, Kronberg, & Böhringer 2001; Kronberg et al. 2001), and cavities emerging from the CDGs and normal elliptical galaxies in clusters may be vessels that transport magnetic fields from galaxy nuclei to the ICM.
Q7. What is the key to understanding the nature of ghost cavities?
This detection of radio emission and a future confirmation with higher resolution are keys to understanding the nature of ghost cavities (§ 5).4.
Q8. What is the X-ray emission from the rims of the cavities?
In this instance, the X-ray emission from the rims surrounding the cavities should be spectrally hard, and gas in the rim should have higher entropy than the surrounding gas.
Q9. What is the effect of the radio sources in the clusters?
The radio sources in the Hydra A (McNamara et al. 2000b), Perseus (Fabian et al. 2000), and Abell 2052 (Blanton et al. 2001) clusters appear to have pushed aside the keV gas, leaving low surface brightness cavities in the gas.
Q10. How was the radio emission of Abell 2597 determined?
In order to determine whether faint radio emission is associated with the cavities, radio observations of Abell 2597 were made with the VLA at 1.4 GHz on 2001 June 21.
Q11. How was the temperature in each aperture determined?
The temperature in each aperture was determined by fitting an absorbed MEKAL single-temperature model in XSPEC with abundances fixed at 0.4 solar and a Galactic foreground column of .
Q12. What is the main reason for the cavities in the ICM?
The rapidly growing number of cavities found in giant elliptical galaxies (Finoguenov & Jones 2000), groups (e.g., Vrtilek et al. 2000), and central dominant cluster galaxies (CDGs; e.g., Schindler et al. 2001) indicates that they are persistent features of these systems.
Q13. What is the physics of the X-ray emission in the clusters?
Early Chandra images of galaxy clusters have shown that the X-ray–emitting gas in their centers is bright and irregularly structured and that much of this structure is associated with powerful radio sources.
Q14. How long does the ghost cavity persist?
Yet the existence of ghost cavities in Abell 2597 and in NGC 1275 (Fabian et al. 2000) beyond their radio lobes shows that they almost certainly persist much longer than 107 yr and therefore must have pressure support.
Q15. What is the effect of radio sources on the formation of the hydrogen?
If such “ghost” cavities, as are seen in Perseus (Fabian et al. 2000) and in Abell 2597 (discussed here and in McNamara et al. 2000a), are generated by radio sources, their properties would have significant consequences for their understanding of the life cycles of radio galaxies and the origin and dispersal of magnetic fields in clusters and galaxies.
Q16. What is the surprising part of the Chandra results?
Perseus (Fabian et al. 2000), and Abell 2052 (Blanton et al. 2001) clusters were surprising, as the emission from the rims of the cavities was among the softest in the clusters.
Q17. What is the effect of the radio emission on the X-ray cusps?
This is consistent with the fact that more than 70% of CDGs in clusters with bright X-ray cusps—cooling flows—harbor powerful radio sources, while less than 20% of CDGs in noncooling flow clusters are radio bright (Burns 1990).