Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles
TLDR
An analysis of 2, 765 articles published in four math journals from 1997 to 2005 indicates that articles deposited in the arXiv received 35% more citations on average than non-deposited articles, and that this difference was most pronounced for highly-cited articles.Abstract:
An analysis of 2, 765 articles published in four math journals from 1997 to 2005 indicate that articles deposited in the arXiv received 35% more citations on average than non-deposited articles (an advantage of about 1.1 citations per article), and that this difference was most pronounced for highly-cited articles. Open Access, Early View, and Quality Differential were examined as three non-exclusive postulates for explaining the citation advantage. There was little support for a universal Open Access explanation, and no empirical support for Early View. There was some inferential support for a Quality Differential brought about by more highly-citable articles being deposited in the arXiv. In spite of their citation advantage, arXiv-deposited articles received 23% fewer downloads from the publisher’s website (about 10 fewer downloads per article) in all but the most recent two years after publication. The data suggest that arXiv and the publisher’s website may be fulfilling distinct functional needs of the reader.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Yassine Gargouri,Chawki Hajjem,Vincent Larivière,Yves Gingras,Les Carr,Tim Brody,Stevan Harnad,Stevan Harnad +7 more
TL;DR: The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because ofA quality advantage, from users self- selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.
Journal ArticleDOI
How open science helps researchers succeed.
Erin C. McKiernan,Philip E. Bourne,C. Titus Brown,Stuart Buck,Amye Kenall,Jennifer Lin,Damon McDougall,Brian A. Nosek,Karthik Ram,Courtney K. Soderberg,Jeffrey R. Spies,Jeffrey R. Spies,Kaitlin Thaney,Andrew Updegrove,Kara H. Woo,Tal Yarkoni +15 more
TL;DR: There is evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices, including increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities.
Journal ArticleDOI
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial.
TL;DR: No evidence was found of a citation advantage for open access articles in the first year after publication, suggesting the citation advantage from open access reported widely in the literature may be an artefact of other causes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Bibliometrics to webometrics
TL;DR: The distance that bibliometrics has travelled since 1958 is reviewed by comparing early bibliometric practice with current practice, and by giving an overview of a range of recent developments, such as patent analysis, national research evaluation exercises, visualization techniques, new applications, online citation indexes, and the creation of digital libraries.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature
TL;DR: The most rigorous study to date showed that, after controlling for the early view postulate, the remaining difference in citation counts between OA and non-OA articles is explained by the selection bias postulate.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences
Journal ArticleDOI
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact.
TL;DR: The results are dramatic, showing a clear correlation between the number of times an article is cited and the probability that the article is online, in computer science.
Journal ArticleDOI
The skewness of science
TL;DR: The skewness in the citedness distribution of each author's articles, the large overlap between different authors and the existence of field‐dependent systematic differences in citedness would seem to make even article citations unsuitable for evaluation of individual scientists or research groups.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors of four disciplines at varying stages of adoption of open access were examined to see whether they have a greater impact as measured by citations in the ISI Web of Science database when their authors make them freely available on the Internet.
Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals
Stevan Harnad,Tim Brody +1 more
TL;DR: Comparing the citation counts of individual OA and non-OA articles appearing in the same (non-OA) journals is revealing dramatic citation advantages for OA.