scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

TLDR
In total hip arthroplasty, a larger femoral head diameter was associated with a lower long-term cumulative risk of dislocation and was greatest in association with the posterolateral approach.
Abstract
Background: It has been postulated that use of a larger femoral head could reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, but only limited clinical data have been presented as proof of this hypothesis Methods: From 1969 to 1999, 21,047 primary total hip arthroplasties with varying femoral head sizes were performed at one institution Patients routinely were followed at defined intervals and were specifically queried about dislocation The operative approach was anterolateral in 9155 arthroplasties, posterolateral in 3646, and transtrochanteric in 8246 The femoral head diameter was 22 mm in 8691 of the procedures, 28 mm in 8797, and 32 mm in 3559 Results: One or more dislocations occurred in 868 of the 21,047 hips The cumulative risk of first-time dislocation was 22% at one year, 30% at five years, 38% at ten years, and 60% at twenty years The cumulative ten-year rate of dislocation was 31% following anterolateral approaches, 34% following transtrochanteric approaches, and 69% following posterolateral approaches The cumulative ten-year rate of dislocation was 38% for 22-mm-diameter femoral heads, 30% for 28-mm heads, and 24% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with an anterolateral approach; 35% for 22-mm heads, 35% for 28-mm heads, and 28% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with a transtrochanteric approach; and 121% for 22-mm heads, 69% for 28-mm heads, and 38% for 32-mm heads in hips treated with a posterolateral approach Multivariate analysis showed the relative risk of dislocation to be 17 for 22-mm compared with 32-mm heads and 13 for 28-mm compared with 32-mm heads Conclusions: In total hip arthroplasty, a larger femoral head diameter was associated with a lower long-term cumulative risk of dislocation The femoral head diameter had an effect in association with all operative approaches, but the effect was greatest in association with the posterolateral approach Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.

TL;DR: The historical target values for cup inclination and anteversion may be useful but should not be considered a safe zone given that the majority of these contemporary THAs that dislocated were within those target values.
Journal ArticleDOI

Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial.

TL;DR: Total hip arthroplasty conferred superior short-term clinical results and fewer complications when compared with hemiarthroplasty in this prospectively randomized study of mobile, independent patients who had sustained a displaced fracture of the femoral neck.
Journal ArticleDOI

Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review

TL;DR: Single stage total hip arthroplasty may lead to lower reoperation rates and better functional outcomes compared with hemiarthroplasty in older patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, but heterogeneity across the available trials and distinct subgroup effects preclude definitive statements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

TL;DR: Before a 36-mm metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene articulation is widely recommended, the incidence of late dislocation, wear, periprosthetic osteolysis, and liner fracture should be established.
Journal ArticleDOI

The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF 1000 CASES INVESTIGATING POSTOPERATIVE STABILITY

TL;DR: A reproducible technique using the transverse acetABular ligament to determine the anteversion of the acetabular component is introduced and it is found that this ligament can be identified in virtually every hip undergoing primary surgery.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

TL;DR: During the ten-year period ending in 1978, 10,500 conventional total hip arthroplasties were performed at the Mayo Clinic; dislocation developed after 331 of these procedures; cross correlations of the data were performed and showed that previous surgery on the hip was the most significant of the factors predisposing to dislocation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention.

TL;DR: A technique of positioning the acetabulum by bony landmarks of the pelvis in the standing position was developed using a standing lateral preoperative roentgenogram with the X-ray tube centered over the trochanter to prevent impingement and dislocation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options.

TL;DR: The extent of the soft-tissue dissection is probably the most important variable since head size and trochanteric nonunion are related to "soft-tissues tension." Modular acetabular components with an elevated rim help to stabilize a hip undergoing a revision procedure.
Journal ArticleDOI

Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair

TL;DR: The two senior authors (PMP, RP) independently began using an identical enhanced posterior soft tissue repair after total hip replacement through a posterior approach and found that a dislocation rate was reduced in patients before and after the enhanced closure.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties.

TL;DR: Surgery was effective in preventing further dislocations in patients with recurrent dislocation and component malposition and the use of an articulated prosthesis is not recommended.
Related Papers (5)