scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors synthesize the literature on clinical decision-support systems' (CDSS) impact on healthcare practitioner performance and patient outcomes, and find no evidence that CDSS significantly impacted practitioner performance.
About
This article is published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.The article was published on 2011-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 454 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review & Evidence-based medicine.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Practice facilitation for scale up of clinical decision support for hypertension management: study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial.

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluate whether practice facilitation provided with hypertension-focused clinical decision support can lead to improvements in blood pressure control for patients seen in small primary care practices, and they conduct a cluster randomized control trial to compare the effect of hypertensionfocused CDS plus practice Facilitation, as compared to CDS alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Computer-assisted analysis of routine electroencephalogram to identify hidden biomarkers of epilepsy: protocol for a systematic review

TL;DR: In this paper , the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative methods applied to ambulatory EEG analysis to guide the diagnosis and management of epilepsy is reviewed. But none have made it to the clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Usability and Utility of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Clinical Decision Support to Increase Knowledge and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Initiations among Pediatric Providers

TL;DR: In this article , an effective clinical decision support system (CDSS) may address the current provider training barrier to offering preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to youth at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality Assurance of Undergraduate Medical Education in Israel by Continuous Monitoring and Prioritization of the Accreditation Standards

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose an approach to assign monitoring to independent medical education units (MEUs), rather than to an infrastructure of the dean's office, and such MEUs to be part of the school governance and draw their authority from university institutions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century

Alastair Baker
- 17 Nov 2001 - 
TL;DR: Analyzing health care organizations as complex systems, Crossing the Quality Chasm also documents the causes of the quality gap, identifies current practices that impede quality care, and explores how systems approaches can be used to implement change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

TL;DR: Evidence Based Medicine (IBM) as discussed by the authors is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients, which is a hot topic for clinicians, public health practitioners, purchasers, planners and the public.
Journal ArticleDOI

From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

Richard Grol, +1 more
- 11 Oct 2003 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice and suggest that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups.
Journal Article

From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Commentary

TL;DR: An overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice is provided, showing that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

TL;DR: A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
Related Papers (5)