Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors synthesize the literature on clinical decision-support systems' (CDSS) impact on healthcare practitioner performance and patient outcomes, and find no evidence that CDSS significantly impacted practitioner performance.About:
This article is published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.The article was published on 2011-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 454 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review & Evidence-based medicine.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Patient-Centered Care Systems
TL;DR: Patient-centered care is evidence-based, interdisciplinary, coordinated among health team members including the patient and family, and crosses the continuum of care as mentioned in this paper, and information systems are required to enable patientcentered care including tools for healthcare professionals as well as those for patients and families.
Journal ArticleDOI
Predicting Lipid-Lowering Medication Persistence after the First Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalization.
TL;DR: Development of a machine learning-based clinical decision support tool to focus improvements in secondary prevention of CVD is feasible, and significant association of persistence with age, diabetes history, complication and comorbidity level is found.
Book ChapterDOI
Medical Imaging Informatics in Nuclear Medicine
TL;DR: Nuclear medicine is one of the major producers of medical imaging data and should stay at the forefront of these developments, because of the variety of available imaging modalities and the imaging-oriented operation of this specialization.
System elektronicznych zapisów medycznych dla wspomagania decyzji z wykorzystaniem google application engine (GAE)
Vasyl Martsenyuk,Andriy Samenets +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Enhanced "Train and Hope" for Scalable, Cost-Effective Professional Development in Youth Suicide Prevention.
Molly Adrian,Molly Adrian,Aaron R. Lyon,Semret Nicodimos,Michael D. Pullmann,Elizabeth McCauley,Elizabeth McCauley +6 more
TL;DR: Strategies to effectively change practitioner knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward suicidal clients may include continuing education and efficient and effective designs of reminder systems for augmenting and supporting suicide assessment management training are needed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
TL;DR: Analyzing health care organizations as complex systems, Crossing the Quality Chasm also documents the causes of the quality gap, identifies current practices that impede quality care, and explores how systems approaches can be used to implement change.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.
TL;DR: Evidence Based Medicine (IBM) as discussed by the authors is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients, which is a hot topic for clinicians, public health practitioners, purchasers, planners and the public.
Journal ArticleDOI
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Richard Grol,Jeremy M. Grimshaw +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice and suggest that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups.
Journal Article
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Commentary
TL;DR: An overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice is provided, showing that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley Shea,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,George A. Wells,Maarten Boers,Neil Andersson,Candyce Hamel,Ashley C Porter,Peter Tugwell,David Moher,Lex M. Bouter +9 more
TL;DR: A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.