scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
No difference was observed between the medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy groups, but both were significantly better than self‐exercise group, and patient satisfaction was highest formedical exercise therapy.
Abstract
Study design A multicenter, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Objectives To evaluate the efficiency of progressively graded medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise by walking in patients with chronic low back pain. Summary and background data Varieties of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy are considered to reduce symptoms, improve function, and decrease sickness absence, but this opinion is controversial. Methods Patients with chronic low back pain or radicular pain sick-listed for more than 8 weeks and less than 52 weeks (Sickness Certificate II) were included. The treatment lasted 3 months (36 treatments). Pain intensity, functional ability, patient satisfaction, return to work, number of days on sick leave, and costs were recorded. Results Of the 208 patients included in this study, 71 were randomly assigned to medical exercise therapy, 67 to conventional physiotherapy, and 70 to self-exercise. Thirty-three (15.8%) patients dropped out during the treatment period. No difference was observed between the medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy groups, but both were significantly better than self-exercise group. Patient satisfaction was highest for medical exercise therapy. Return to work rates were equal for all 3 intervention groups at assessment 15 months after therapy was started, with 123 patients were back to work. In terms of costs for days on sick leave, the medical exercise therapy group saved 906,732 Norwegian Kroner (NOK) ($122,531.00), and the conventional physiotherapy group saved NOK 1,882,560 ($254,200.00), compared with the self-exercise group. Conclusions The efficiency of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy is shown. Leaving patients with chronic low back pain untampered poses a risk of worsening the disability, resulting in longer periods of sick leave.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Oswestry Disability Index.

TL;DR: The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure, and the process of using the ODI is reviewed and should be the subject of further research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-specific low back pain

TL;DR: Two treatment strategies are currently used, a stepped approach beginning with more simple care that is progressed if the patient does not respond, and the use of simple risk prediction methods to individualise the amount and type of care provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

TL;DR: These two widely used measures, the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), are described and evidence of their validity and reliability and some comparative results obtained with the use of the two questionnaires are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain.

TL;DR: Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy To Improve Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain

TL;DR: It is concluded that exercise therapy seems to be effective at slightly decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low back pain, particularly in health care populations.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal Article

The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire

TL;DR: Soms is het moeilijk om tussen twee vakjes te kiezen, kruis dan het vakje aan dat uw huidig probleem het best beschrijft.
Journal ArticleDOI

1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back Pain

TL;DR: Observations of natural history and epidemiology suggest that low-back pain should be a benign, self-limiting condition, that low back-disability as opposed to pain is a relatively recent Western epidemic, and that the role of medicine in that epidemic must be critically examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions.

TL;DR: The quality of the design, execution, and reporting of randomized controlled trials should be improved, to establish strong evidence for the effectiveness of the various therapeutic interventions for acute and chronic low back pain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials

TL;DR: Differences in case-fatality rates between treatment and control groups were found, and the importance of keeping those who recruit patients for clinical trials from suspecting which treatment will be assigned to the patient under consideration is emphasized.
Related Papers (5)