Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.: Can Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts Survive a "Fairness" Analysis?

TLDR: Orenstein et al. as mentioned in this paper proposed a fair analysis of Mandatory Arbitration clauses in employment contracts and found that they are alive and well or withering on the vine. But they did not consider the effect of mandatory arbitration clauses on the fairness of employment contracts.

Abstract: Stuart L. Bass, What the Courts Say About Mandatory Arbitration, DISPUTE RESOLUTION J., Nov. 1999, at 24. Russell Evans, Note, Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.: Can Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts Survive a \"Fairness\" Analysis?, 50 HASTINGS L.J. 635 (1999). L. Anthony George, Controlling Legal Costs in Labor Arbitration, COLO. LAW., June 1999, at 75. Michelle R. Mitchell, Book Review, Arbitration Agreements: When Do Employers Waive Their Rights?, 14 BYU J. PUB. L. 83 (1999). Morton H. Orenstein, Mandatory Arbitration: Alive and Well or Withering on the Vine?, DISPUTE RESOLUTION J., Aug. 1999, at 57.