scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)

TLDR
The authors argue that many reform initiatives in developing countries fail to achieve sustained improvements in performance because they are merely isomorphic mimicry, i.e., governments and organizations pretend to reform by changing what policies or organizations look like rather than what they actually do.
About
This article is published in World Development.The article was published on 2013-11-01 and is currently open access. It has received 392 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters

The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Chinese Translation)

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them, and describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations

Robert K. Yin
- 10 Jul 2013 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight current knowledge regarding the use of rival explanations, triangulation, and logic models in strengthening validity, and analytic generalization and the role of theory in seeking to generalize from case studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation

TL;DR: In many nations today the state has little capability to carry out even basic functions like security, policing, regulation or core service delivery as mentioned in this paper, and the state needs to enhance this capability, especially in fragil...
Book

The Innovation Paradox: Developing-Country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-Up

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on three central determinants of innovation performance: (1) the critical complements to innovation investment needed to realize the high potential returns; (2) the range of firm capabilities required to undertake innovation and take it to market; and (3) the required government capabilities for implementing effective innovation policies.
Book

Building State Capability

TL;DR: Evidence of the capability shortfalls that currently exist in many countries is provided, showing that many governments lack basic capacities even after decades of reforms and capacity building efforts, and a process that governments can use to escape these capability traps is described.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them, and describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative.
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth discipline - the art and practice of the learning organization

TL;DR: Senge's Fifth Discipline is a set of principles for building a "learning organization" as discussed by the authors, where people expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nutured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are contually learning together.
Book

Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the origins, rationality, incrementalism, and Garbage Cans of the idea of agenda status and present a case study of noninterview measures of Agenda status.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Science of "Muddling Through"

TL;DR: Lindblom, C.E. as mentioned in this paper discussed the science of "muddling through" in the context of monetary policy. But he did not consider monetary policy with respect to inflation.
Book ChapterDOI

The science of muddling through

TL;DR: Lindblom, C.E. as mentioned in this paper discussed the science of "muddling through" in the context of monetary policy. But he did not consider monetary policy with respect to inflation.
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (pdia)" ?

The authors propose an approach, Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation ( PDIA ), based on four core principles, each of which stands in sharp contrast with the standard approaches. The corresponding author is Matt Andrews, Assistant Professor, Harvard Kennedy School, 116 Rubenstein, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. This paper is part of a broader research agenda at the Harvard Kennedy School ‘ s Center for International Development supported by WIDER. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone, and should not be attributed to the respective organizations with which they are affiliated. 

The emphasis on form (what organizations ‗look like‘) over function (what they actually ‗do‘) is a crucial characteristic of the capability trap facing many developing countries. 

Focusing on prevailing problems is the most direct way of redressing the bias to externally prescribed forms towards internal needs for functionality; it ensures that problems are locally defined, not externally determined, and puts the onus on performance, not compliance. 

The upshot is unimplemented laws, unfunded agencies, and unused processes littering education sectors, public financial management regimes and judiciaries across the globe (Pritchett, Woolcock and Andrews 2010). 

The focus on problems also incentivizes organizations to emphasize their performance, and encourages contributions from leaders and front-line workers to work for change. 

Facilitating such positive deviations, through incremental steps, is especially important in uncertain and complex contexts where reformers are unsure of what the problems and solutions actually are and lack confidence in their abilities to make things better. 

The basic message must be that interventions are successful if they empower a constant process through which agents make organizations better performers,regardless of the forms adopted to effect such change. 

Many reform initiatives in developing countries fail to achieve sustained improvements in performance because they are merely isomorphic mimicry—that is, governments and organizations pretend to reform by changing what policies or organizations look like rather than what they actually do. 

Perhaps the most spectacular large-scale contemporary example is that the richest and most powerful nation in the history of humankind has just spent a decade—and enormous amounts of blood (almost 2000 dead) and treasure (over half a trillion dollars)—attempting to (re)build state capability in a very small and poor South Asian country. 

The necessary experimentation processes require mechanisms that capture lessons and ensure these are used to inform future activities. 

The result is a top-down approach to building procurement capacity (and beyond) in these governments, through which external role players impose themselves on local contexts and crowd out potential contributions local agents might make to change. 

The importance of active learning mechanisms and iterative feedback loops A problem-driven, stepwise reform process can thus help countries escape from capability traps. 

Their argument draws on literatures about institutional entrepreneurship and the importance of distributed agency in the process of change and development.