scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Evaluating the impact of number controls, choice and competition : an analysis of the student profile and the student learning environment in the new higher education landscape.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, an analysis of how institutions responded to student number controls (SNCs), choice and competition in relation to the student profile and the student learning environment draws on data from two sources, a national survey and a representative set of interviews with senior institutional managers.
Abstract
The context for this research is the introduction of several reforms designed to change the ways that higher education institutions operate. The government white paper Students at the heart of the system (BIS 2011) set out a new context for improving the student experience in English higher education based on consumer pressure on institutional behaviours, practices and, ultimately, systems. The following analysis of how institutions responded to student number controls (SNCs), choice and competition in relation to the student profile and the student learning environment draws on data from two sources, a national survey and a representative set of interviews with senior institutional managers. Together, data from these two sources provide the sector with the first comprehensive analysis of the strategic changes in approach and the rationales behind them. The research took place in a context of a volatile policy environment and the paper highlights the complex effects of two concurrent and linked processes: one, the ongoing effects of marketisation and how institutional decision-making processes were inflected by the daily realities of a system based on choice and competition; and two, the traceable effects of the specific 'core and margin' policy in operation after 2012-13. The analysis provides valuable insights into ways in which institutions may act after student number controls are removed altogether from 2015-16.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors make the case for an ethical posthuman Bildung which recognises the inseparability of knowing and being, the materiality of educative relations, and the need to install an ecology of ethical relations at the centre of educational practice in higher education.
Journal ArticleDOI

What makes students satisfied? A discussion and analysis of the UK’s national student survey

TL;DR: This paper found that students registered on clinical degrees and those studying humanities to be the most satisfied, with those in general engineering and media studies the least, and that contentment was higher among part-time students and significantly higher among Russell group and post-1992 universities.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of the changing English higher education marketplace on widening participation and fair access : evidence from a discourse analysis of access agreements

TL;DR: The authors used a discourse analysis of access policy statements to trace the impact of differentiation and marketisation among English HE institutions that was evident before but accelerated by recent policy developments, including the increase in tuition fees.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula

TL;DR: The authors brings together the authors' previous work on co-created curricula (Bovill, 2013a, 2014; Bovill et al., 2011) and on partnership and ethics (Taylor, 2015; Taylor and Robinson, 2014), t...
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities

TL;DR: This paper set out the author's view of discourse analysis and illustrates the approach with an analysis of discursive aspects of marketization of public discourse in contemporary Britain, specifi cally.
Book

Qualitative research practice

Jane Ritchie
Book

What are Universities For

TL;DR: Stefan Collini challenges the common claim that universities need to show that they help to make money in order to justify getting more money, and argues that the authors must reflect on the different types of institution and the distinctive roles they play.
Journal ArticleDOI

What are universities for

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that many misunderstand the true benefit of universities to society and argue that it is the whole university enterprise that is important, as the only place where that totality of ourselves and our world is brought together, and which makes it the strongest provider of the rational explanation and meaning that societies need.