Journal ArticleDOI
Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking
Reads0
Chats0
About:
This article is published in Journal of Experimental Psychology.The article was published on 1970-08-01. It has received 149 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Backward masking & Masking (art).read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.
Bruno G. Breitmeyer,Leo Ganz +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI
On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.
Journal ArticleDOI
Competition for consciousness among visual events : The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes
TL;DR: In this paper, two masking processes were found: an early process affected by physical factors such as adapting luminance, and a later process influenced by attentional factors, called masking by object substitution, which occurs whenever there is a mismatch between the reentrant visual representation and the ongoing lower level activity.
Journal ArticleDOI
What’s new in visual masking?
James T. Enns,Vincent Di Lollo +1 more
TL;DR: A new theory of visual masking, inspired by developments in neuroscience, can account for several recently described backward masking effects, including masking by four small dots that surround (but do not touch) a target object and masks by a surrounding object that remains on display after the target object has been turned off.
Journal ArticleDOI
Temporal integration in visual memory.
TL;DR: An inverse relationship between duration of inducing stimulus and duration of sensory persistence is suggested and allows the inference that visual persistence may be identified more fittingly with ongoing neural processes than with the decaying contents of an iconic store.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Processing of sequentially presented letters
TL;DR: The authors found that the processing time (onset to onset) predicted the number of letters correctly reported, regardless of the partition between on-time and off-time, and that this correlation is probably in part artifactual, so that no claim can be made that it takes longer to process a long as compared to a short word.