scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Fictionality and Mimesis: Between Narrativity and Fictional Worlds

Richard Walsh
- 10 Jan 2003 - 
- Vol. 11, Iss: 1, pp 110-121
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors make a distinction between the epistemic and linguistic perspectives of fiction and fictional worlds theories, and make some progress toward a fuller characterization of the rhetorical nature of fictionality by identifying what is excluded by the perspectives of a generalized narrativity and fictional world theory.
Abstract
The concept of fictionality has been undermined by developments in two distinct areas of research in recent years: on the one hand, the interdisciplinary ambitions of narrative theory have tended to conflate fictionality with a general notion of narrativity that encompasses nonfictional narrative; on the other hand, fictional worlds theory, in response to philosophical and linguistic concerns, has sought to disarm fictionality by literalizing fictional reference. Dorrit Cohn, in The Distinction of Fiction, has made a case against the former tendency in the interest of her own reassertion of a generic focus upon fiction as "nonreferential narrative," although this involves no confrontation with fictional worlds theory, which does not contest the generic integrity of fiction (12). My concern here is somewhat different, in two respects: I want to allow a little more force to those narratological perspectives that tend to merge the concept of fictionality with that of narrativity; and I want to distinguish more sharply between my own understanding of fictionality and the way it is framed by the philosophical and linguistic perspectives of fictional worlds theories. These differences arise because in my view the concept at stake is not fiction as a generic category, but fictionality as a rhetorical resource. By identifying what is excluded by the perspectives of a generalized narrativity and fictional worlds theory, I hope to make some progress toward a fuller characterization of the rhetorical nature of fictionality. This undertaking will lead me to a reconsideration of the concept of mimesis in relation to narrative fictions, from which vantage point I want to draw an analogy between "fiction" and "exercise" that I think captures something of the distinctiveness of the fictional use of narrative.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Time and Narrative

TL;DR: In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature as discussed by the authors, and this final volume, a comprehensive reexamination and synthesis of the ideas developed in volumes 1 and 2, stands as Ricoeure's most complete and satisfying presentation of his own philosophy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect (review)

TL;DR: In this paper, White collects eight interrelated essays primarily concerned with the treatment of history in recent literary critical discourse, focusing on the conventions of historical writing and the ordering of historical consciousness.
Dissertation

Fiktionales Erzählen. Zur Theorie der literarischen Fiktion als Make-Believe

TL;DR: In this article, the make-believe theory of Kendall L. Walton, which explains fiction as a family resemblance of all representational arts, is adopted in order to explain the fictionality of fictional narratives.
References
More filters
Book

Time and narrative

TL;DR: In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature as mentioned in this paper, and this final volume, a comprehensive reexamination and synthesis of the ideas developed in volumes 1 and 2, stands as Ricoeure's most complete and satisfying presentation of his own philosophy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Time and Narrative

TL;DR: In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature as discussed by the authors, and this final volume, a comprehensive reexamination and synthesis of the ideas developed in volumes 1 and 2, stands as Ricoeure's most complete and satisfying presentation of his own philosophy.
Book

Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation

TL;DR: The author explains the author's motivation for writing the preface, which addressed the "preference situation of communication" in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and its consequences.
Book

Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature

TL;DR: A half-century after its translation into English, Erich Auerbach's "Mimesis" still stands as a monumental achievement in literary criticism as mentioned in this paper, a brilliant display of erudition, wit, and wisdom, his exploration of how great European writers from Homer to Virginia Woolf depicted reality has taught generations how to read Western literature.
Book

The Politics of Postmodernism

TL;DR: In this article, the postmodernist representation is de-naturalized the natural, Photographic discourse, Telling Stories: fiction and history, Re-presenting the past: 'total history' de-totalized, Knowing the past in the present, The archive as text.