Open AccessPosted Content
Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives
TLDR
In this paper, the authors propose a test of "foreseeable copying" to limit copyright's grant of exclusivity to situations where a copier's use was reasonably foreseeable to the creator at the time of creation.Abstract:
Copyright law's principal justification has for long been the theory of creator incentives. Creators are presumed to be rational utility-maximizers and therefore induced to create by the mere prospect of controlling a future market for their yet-to-be-created works. Yet, current copyright doctrine does surprisingly little to give effect to this theory. None of its current doctrines enable courts to circumscribe a creator's entitlement by reference to the idea of incentives and the limitations inherent therein. As a consequence, copyright's grant of exclusivity is presumed to extend to all markets and uses for a work, whether or not they were capable of forming any part of a creator's incentive. Through its allocation of costs and benefits, the common law too relies on providing actors with incentives to behave in certain ways. Unlike copyright law however, the common law recognizes the existence of a clear outer limit to its incentive structure and attempts to give effect to this limit through the concept of 'foreseeability'. Premised on the idea that individuals do not process consequences that are temporally or causally far removed from their actions, foreseeability requires courts to eliminate from the liability calculus certain low-probability occurrences when they are unlikely to have influenced an individual's decision at the time of action. Foreseeability thus represents a cognition-based doctrinal limit to the behavioral modification that the common law attempts to induce. This Article argues that if copyright law is to remain true to its theory of incentives, it needs to pay closer attention to the way in which incentives actually influence creative decision-making and internalize the idea that creators, like actors elsewhere, are incapable of fully anticipating all future contingencies associated with their actions, that in turn limits the effectiveness of incentives. To this end, it proposes a test of 'foreseeable copying' to limit copyright's grant of exclusivity to situations where a copier's use was reasonably foreseeable to the creator at the time of creation --the point when the incentive is meant to operate. Adopting a test of foreseeability is thus likely to better align copyright law with its underlying purpose and provide courts with a mechanism by which to give effect to copyright's theory of incentives in individual cases --thereby according it more than just rhetorical significance.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Constitutional afterlife: The continuing impact of Thailand's postpolitical constitution
TL;DR: Thailand's constitution of 1997 introduced profound changes into the country's governance, creating a post-political democratic structure in which an intricate array of guardian institutions served to limit the role of elected politicians as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Liability for Lapses: First or Second Order Negligence?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors modify the prevailing tort rule to allow a defense of second-order reasonableness, which reduces the burden of liability on the underlying activity, which is especially desirable to encourage activities that benefit others.
Book
Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks
TL;DR: In this paper, a range of rules and proposed rules for extending liability for personal injuries beyond insolvent entities are discussed. And a new tort based on conspiracy is proposed to cover not only control-based relationships but also horizontal coordination between companies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ambiguity About Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry into Legal Interpretation
TL;DR: This article developed a survey instrument for exploring determinations of ambiguity and administered it to nearly 1,000 law students, finding that asking respondents whether a statute is ambiguous in their own minds produces answers that are strongly biased by their policy preferences.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science
TL;DR: The authors compare two theories of human rationality: procedural, bounded rationality from contemporary cognitive psychology and global, substantive rationality from economics, and conclude that the model predictions rest primarily on the auxiliary assumptions rather than deriving from the rationality principle.
Book ChapterDOI
An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the evolution and major doctrines in copyright law from an economic point of view and discuss the evolution of copyright as a whole, discussing the major doctrines of copyright law.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Nature and Function of the Patent System
TL;DR: The patent system performs a function not previously noted: 1) to increase the output from resources used for technological innovation; 2) to reduce the output of the technology it subjects to exclusive control; and 3) to reintegrate the patent institution with the general theory of property rights.
Journal ArticleDOI
On the behavioral and rational foundations of economic dynamics
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that existing uncertainties about the correct explanations for economic growth and business cycles cannot be settled by aggregative analysis within the neoclassical framework, and that such disputes can only be settled with painstaking microeconomic empirical study of human decision making and problem solving.
Journal ArticleDOI
Causation and Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule
TL;DR: An analysis of the incentives to take care that are created under the negligence rule is presented, insofar as additional care reduces the risk either of being found to have acted negligently or of this negligence being finding to have caused the accident.