scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Heartbeat: principles for excellence in development of clinical guidelines

Catherine M Otto
- 01 Jun 2021 - 
- Vol. 107, Iss: 12, pp 937-939
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Otto et al. as discussed by the authors summarized the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) principles and processes for development of clinical guidelines in England, and compared the NICE methodology with the current approach of our cardiovascular professional societies, as well as to established reporting criteria for clinical practice guidelines.
Abstract
Clinical guidelines have become a core element in optimising care for patients with cardiovascular disease. However, the quality of guidelines depends on a rigorous unbiased process that integrates the clinical evidence with input from a range of stakeholders. In this issue of Heart , Garbi1 summarises the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) principles and processes for development of clinical guidelines in England. The discussion is divided into four key areas: (1) Guideline development by an independent advisory committee includes aligning recommendations with national health policies, and involvement of patients, patient-advocates, and the public as well as healthcare professionals. (2) Recommendations should be based on relevant, reliable and robust evidence and should include consideration of cost-effectiveness and population benefit. (3) Guidelines should support innovation and reduce healthcare inequalities. (4) Finally, ensuring guideline implementation and providing regular updates are essential. In the accompanying editorial, Otto, Kudenchuk and Newby2 compare the NICE methodology with the current approach of our cardiovascular professional societies, as well as to established reporting criteria for clinical practice guidelines (figure 1).3 They propose several areas for improvement including cooperative development of a common evidence database; a rigorous transparent process based on established standards; a more diverse group of stakeholders; minimising conflicts of interest; support by information specialists, medical writers and other relevant experts; regular updates; adaptation for regional …

read more

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines.

TL;DR: The development of the AGREE Reporting Checklist is described, which was designed to improve the quality of practice guideline reporting and aligns with AGREE II in its structure and content.
Journal ArticleDOI

Community prevalence, mechanisms and outcome of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the community prevalence of moderate or greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation (MR/TR), and compare subjects identified by population screening with those with known valvular heart disease (VHD), to understand the mechanisms of MR/TR and to assess the rate of valve intervention and long-term outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines development principles and processes

TL;DR: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) developed clinical guidelines as discussed by the authors, which are developed by professional societies and also, in England, by an independent non-departmental public body.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why and when to screen for cardiovascular disease in healthy individuals.

TL;DR: The rationale, need and opportunity of multiple screening for cardiovascular disease has been discussed in this article, where the authors propose to use the uniform natural history and prevention of manifest atherosclerosis for much larger benefits than seen in cancer screening programmes.
Related Papers (5)