scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

Household Food Security in the United States in 2016

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An estimated 87.7 percent of American households were food secure throughout the entire year in 2016, meaning they had access at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members.
Abstract
An estimated 87.7 percent of American households were food secure throughout the entire year in 2016, meaning they had access at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members. The remaining households (12.3 percent) were food insecure at least some time during the year, including 4.9 percent with very low food security, meaning that at times the food intake of one or more household members was reduced and their eating patterns were disrupted because the household lacked money and other resources for obtaining food. Changes from 2015 to 2016 in food insecurity overall (from 12.7 to 12.3 percent) and in very low food security (from 5.0 to 4.9 percent) were not statistically significant, but they continued a downward trend in food insecurity from a high of 14.9 percent in 2011. Among children, changes from 2015 in food insecurity and very low food security were also not statistically significant. Children and adults were food insecure in 8.0 percent of households with children in 2016, essentially unchanged from 7.8 percent in 2015. Very low food security among children was 0.8 percent in 2016, essentially unchanged from 0.7 percent in 2015. In 2016, the typical food-secure household spent 29 percent more on food than the typical food-insecure household of the same size and household composition. About 59 percent of food-insecure households participated in one or more of the three largest Federal food and nutrition assistance programs during the month prior to the 2016 survey (food stamps (SNAP); Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); and the National School Lunch Program).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Health Inequities and the Shifting Paradigms of Food Security, Food Insecurity, and Food Sovereignty

TL;DR: It is argued that food sovereignty offers a better alternative for understanding and responding to food issues in relation to the challenge of tackling health inequities and that an interactive dialogue in research and social actions between food sovereignty and health inequity can mutually enrich and strengthen both fields of research and spheres of social actions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient experiences and provider perspectives on a hospital-based food pantry: a mixed methods evaluation study.

TL;DR: Hospitals with onsite food pantries must work to eliminate barriers to FI screening and pantry referral, and develop nutritional guidelines for food donations and connect patients with nutrition education resources.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Summer Nutrition Benefit Pilot Program and Low-income Children's Food Security.

TL;DR: SEBTC is a promising model to improve food security and the dietary quality of low-income school-aged children in the summer months and had positive impacts on 6 of the 8 child nutrition outcomes measured.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the Gap: Food Insecurity and Resource Engagement

TL;DR: Through hospital-community partnership in an initial attempt to screen and offer direct-referral for FI, considerable interest among families for connection to resource agencies was elicited, but there was a substantial gap between referral acceptance and ultimate connection with the resource agency stemming from two major sources: inability to re-contact and loss of interest after contact.
Journal ArticleDOI

Food Insecurity, Food Deserts, and Waist-to-Height Ratio: Variation by Sex and Race/Ethnicity.

TL;DR: Given the link between food-related hardships and obesity, targeted interventions that alleviate food insecurity and inadequate access to healthy food retailers could be effective in reducing obesity.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations

TL;DR: The Expert Panel recognized that they could not provide a comprehensive design for the evaluation of nutritional status for all difficult-to-sample populations that would be appropriate for all public health and policy purposes and concentrated their discussions on enumeration of the various issues that must be considered in planning any effort to evaluate the nutritional concerns for such populations.
ReportDOI

The Under-Reporting of Transfers in Household Surveys: Its Nature and Consequences

TL;DR: In this paper, the extent of under-reporting for ten transfer programs in five major nationally representative surveys by comparing reported weighted totals for these programs with totals obtained from government agencies was investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Much Does the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Reduce Food Insecurity

TL;DR: This paper measures the effectiveness of SNAP in reducing food insecurity using an instrumental variables approach to control for selection and suggests that receipt of SNAP benefits reduces the likelihood of being food insecure by roughly 30% and reduces thelihood of being very food insecurity by 20%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring Food Insecurity and Hunger in the United States: Development of a National Benchmark Measure and Prevalence Estimates

TL;DR: A comprehensive benchmark measure of the severity and prevalence of food insecurity and hunger in the United States is developed and is being used by researchers throughout the U.S. and Canada.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Food Stamp Program and Food Insufficiency

TL;DR: The authors showed that food stamp recipients have the same probability of food insufficiency as non-recipients, even after controlling for other factors, and established a theoretical framework to address this adverse selection.
Related Papers (5)