scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Iconographies supplémentaires de l'article : La version française du questionnaire de Leymann sur la violence psychologique au travail : le « Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror » (LIPT)

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the first validated French version of the "Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror" (LIPT), considered to be the instrument of reference, was presented.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Workplace bullying is considered as a major job stress factor and is associated with mental disorders. To date, there was no validated French version of the "Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror" (LIPT), considered to be the instrument of reference. The objective of this study was to elaborate this French version and to explore its factorial, convergent and predictive validity. METHODS: The present study was based on a large sample of men and women of the working population asked to participate to a cross-sectional survey by a network of 143 occupational physicians in the South-East of France. This study included 7694 subjects, 3132 men and 4562 women, who responded to the anonymous self-questionnaire including the French version of the LIPT. This version was obtained by a standard forward/backward translation procedure. RESULTS: The LIPT allows to evaluate the 12-month prevalence of exposure to 45 forms of bullying. The analysis of an open question asking for other potentially missing forms of bullying underlined the satisfactory coverage of the LIPT. The study of the factorial validity showed a satisfactory coherence in the interpretation of the factors obtained. Leymann defined workplace bullying by the exposure to at least one form of bullying, weekly or more, and for at least six months. The convergent and predictive validity were increased when this definition was combined with the self-report of being exposed to bullying. CONCLUSION: This study is the first one elaborating and validating the French version of the LIPT by Leymann. This step of development and validation of the French version of questionnaires seems crucial to set up future high-quality studies, and to allow comparisons at the international level. Workplace bullying seems to be a serious problem in the French working life given the prevalence observed here (around 10%). Forthcoming studies should prefer using such validated questionnaire to better understand and prevent this occupational risk factor.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarise some descriptive empirical findings of bullying in the European workplace and present various bullying definitions and the respective meta-analytical prevalence rates are reported, followed by an examination of the gender, number and status of bullies and victims.
Journal ArticleDOI

Association between workplace bullying and depressive symptoms in the French working population.

TL;DR: Workplace bullying was found to be a strong risk factor for depressive symptoms for men and women and efforts to prevent bullying should be intensified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Workplace bullying and sleep disturbances: findings from a large scale cross-sectional survey in the french working population.

TL;DR: The findings suggest that the contribution of workplace bullying to the burden of sleep disturbances may be substantial.
Book ChapterDOI

Measuring Exposure to Workplace Bullying

TL;DR: However, despite all this attention on bullying in itself, little is known about how the use of different measurement and estimation methods inflences the fiendings on workplace bullying.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychopathological features of a patient population of targets of workplace bullying

TL;DR: Stress at work and depression influenced significatively capacity to go back to work and workers showed a significantly better score on the HAD scale than non-workers, and over half the targets presented a neuroticism-related predominant personality trait.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The content and development of mobbing at work

TL;DR: In this paper, the concept of mobbing is introduced, which is defined as harassing, ganging up on someone, or psychologically terrorizing others at work at work, in the context of medical and psychological stress research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the scandinavian approach

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a framework for future research and theory development in this field, and review the Scandinavian research tradition according to this framework, and provide some suggestions for the future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the prevalence of bullying and harassment at work, to identify risk groups and risk organizations, and to investigate who the victims report to be their tormentors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research

Kaj Björkqvist
- 01 Feb 1994 - 
TL;DR: In this article, it is argued that it is incorrect, or rather, nonsensical, to claim that males are more aggressive than females, and a theory regarding the development of styles of aggressive behavior is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work

TL;DR: In this article, the causes of mobbing at work are investigated and it is argued that the organisation, the social system, a certain perpetrator and the victim have to be considered as potential causes.