scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Identification of Bias Against People with Disabilities in Sentiment Analysis and Toxicity Detection Models

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Bias Identification Test in Sentiments (BITS) corpus as discussed by the authors is a corpus of 1,126 sentences designed to probe sentiment analysis models for biases in disability, which is used to identify potential biases against disability in any sentiment analysis tools.
Abstract
Sociodemographic biases are a common problem for natural language processing, affecting the fairness and integrity of its applications. Within sentiment analysis, these biases may undermine sentiment predictions for texts that mention personal attributes that unbiased human readers would consider neutral. Such discrimination can have great consequences in the applications of sentiment analysis both in the public and private sectors. For example, incorrect inferences in applications like online abuse and opinion analysis in social media platforms can lead to unwanted ramifications, such as wrongful censoring, towards certain populations. In this paper, we address the discrimination against people with disabilities, PWD, done by sentiment analysis and toxicity classification models. We provide an examination of sentiment and toxicity analysis models to understand in detail how they discriminate PWD. We present the Bias Identification Test in Sentiments (BITS), a corpus of 1,126 sentences designed to probe sentiment analysis models for biases in disability. We use this corpus to demonstrate statistically significant biases in four widely used sentiment analysis tools (TextBlob, VADER, Google Cloud Natural Language API and DistilBERT) and two toxicity analysis models trained to predict toxic comments on Jigsaw challenges (Toxic comment classification and Unintended Bias in Toxic comments). The results show that all exhibit strong negative biases on sentences that mention disability. We publicly release BITS Corpus for others to identify potential biases against disability in any sentiment analysis tools and also to update the corpus to be used as a test for other sociodemographic variables as well.

read more

References
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

TL;DR: BERT as mentioned in this paper pre-trains deep bidirectional representations from unlabeled text by jointly conditioning on both left and right context in all layers, which can be fine-tuned with just one additional output layer to create state-of-the-art models for a wide range of tasks.
Book

Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis

TL;DR: This survey covers techniques and approaches that promise to directly enable opinion-oriented information-seeking systems and focuses on methods that seek to address the new challenges raised by sentiment-aware applications, as compared to those that are already present in more traditional fact-based analysis.
Posted Content

DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter

TL;DR: This work proposes a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts, and introduces a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses.
Proceedings Article

VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text

TL;DR: Interestingly, using the authors' parsimonious rule-based model to assess the sentiment of tweets, it is found that VADER outperforms individual human raters, and generalizes more favorably across contexts than any of their benchmarks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Facial expression and emotion.

Paul Ekman
TL;DR: In this paper, cross-cultural research on facial expression and the developments of methods to measure facial expression are summarized and what has been learned about emotion from this work on the face is elucidated.