scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Identifying Arabic compounds other than the Synthetic Genitive Construction

Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh
- 10 Sep 2016 - 
- Vol. 63, Iss: 3, pp 277-298
TLDR
This article examined types of compounds other than the Synthetic Genitive Construction (SGC) in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), discussing the word class of the parts of the compound and identifying the head.
Abstract
This study examines types of compounds other than the Synthetic Genitive Construction (SGC) in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), discussing the word class of the parts of the compound and identifying the head. The analysis reveals that there are four types of compounds in MSA, and three in JA. The Prep + Prep combination is missing from JA. I also argue that the word class of the parts of the compound of Arabic in general, and of MSA in particular, is not diverse. Regarding the head, I suggest that N + N compounds other than the SGC, Adj + Adj compounds and reduplicated compounds can be either semantically double-headed or headless

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An analysis of Arabic metaphorical and/or metonymical compounds: A cognitive linguistic approach

TL;DR: This paper provided an analysis of Arabic metaphorical and/or metonymical compounds, extracted from a 20,000-word corpus, based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Conceptual Blending Theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Headedness in Arabic Compounds within the Synthetic Genitive Construction

TL;DR: In this article, the position of head in Arabic compounds within the Synthetic Genitive Construction (SGC) was pinpointed and the headedness of these compounds morphologically, syntactically, syntactic and syntactica.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the Awareness of English Polysemous Words by Arabic-Speaking EFL Learners

TL;DR: This paper measured the extent to which Arabic-speaking EFL learners are aware of polysemy in English, and investigated whether the English proficiency level of Arabic-English learners plays a role in their ability to distinguish between the various meanings of English polysemous words, and whether they face problems when they encounter these words in unusual contexts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stress Assignment in N+N Combinations in Arabic

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the use of stress as a criterion to distinguish between compounds and phrases in Arabic and found that, in both Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), stress plays no role in distinguishing between various N+N combinations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identifying N+N compounding in Modern Standard Arabic and Jordanian Arabic

TL;DR: The authors identify types of compounds in Modern Standard Arabic and Jordanian Arabic by applying the cross-linguistic criteria for compoundhood discussed in the relevant literature, with a special focus on English and Hebrew.
References
More filters
Book

Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution

TL;DR: Foundations of Language as discussed by the authors is a broad survey of linguistics, introducing a new holistic theory of the relation between the sounds, structure, and meaning of language and their relation to the mind and the brain.
Book

A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic

TL;DR: A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic is a comprehensive handbook on the structure of Arabic in which the essential aspects of its phonology, morphology, and syntax can be readily looked up and understood.
Book

The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an introduction to the concept of influence, influence, and influence in the creation of subjecks. But they do not discuss the relationship between influence and influence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use

TL;DR: This paper tracked the historical development of this discourse style and observed the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing by analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation).