scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Impact of menstrual phase on false-negative mammograms in the canadian national breast screening study

TLDR
The efficacy of breast carcinoma screening should be enhanced if false‐negative mammography were reduced, and menstrual cycle phase was associated with false‐ negative outcomes for mammographic screening.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of breast carcinoma screening should be enhanced if false-negative mammography were reduced. Prospectively collected data from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study were used to examine whether menstrual cycle phase was associated with false-negative outcomes for mammographic screening. METHODS Of 8887 women ages 40-44 years at the onset of screening, randomized to receive annual mammography and clinical breast examination, reporting menstruation no more than 28 days prior to their screening examination, and with a valid radiologic report, 1898 had never used oral contraceptives or replacement estrogen with or without progesterone. The remainder were past (6573) and current (416) estrogen users. Similar selection criteria were applied at subsequent screens. The distribution of false-negative and false-positive mammography in relation to true-negative and true-positive mammography was examined with respect to the follicular (Days 1 to 14) and luteal (Days 15-28) menstrual phases. RESULTS Comparing luteal with follicular mammograms in 6989 patients who ever used estrogen, the unadjusted odds ratio (2-sided P -values) for false-negatives versus true-negatives was 2.16 (0.05) and the adjusted odds ratio was 1.47 (0.05). In 1898 never-users, parallel odds ratios for luteal false-negatives were 0.55 (1.0) and 0.74 (1.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that menstruating women who have used hormones may have an increased risk of false-negative results for screening mammograms performed in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. An increased risk of false-negative mammography might adversely affect screening efficacy. The impact of menstrual phase on mammographic interpretation, especially for women who ever used hormones, requires further investigation. Cancer 1997; 80:720-4. © 1997 American Cancer Society.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

TL;DR: It is found that breast cancer mortality was an unreliable outcome that was biased in favour of screening, mainly because of differential misclassification of cause of death.
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

TL;DR: The accuracy of screening mammography is best in older women and in women with fatty breasts, and the individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and HRT use on mammographic accuracy are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention

TL;DR: The International Agency for Research on Cancer conducts a programme of research concentrating particularly on the epidemiology of cancer and the study of potential carcinogens in the human environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer.

TL;DR: MRI was more accurate than mammography in annual breast cancer surveillance of women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer and larger prospective studies to examine the role of MRI in screening programs are justified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Variation in Mammographic Breast Density by Time in Menstrual Cycle Among Women Aged 40–49 Years

TL;DR: Findings are consistent with previous evidence suggesting that scheduling a woman's mammogram during the follicular phase of her menstrual cycle instead of during the luteal phase (third and fourth week) may improve the accuracy of mammography for premenopausal women in their forties.
References
More filters
Book

An introduction to the bootstrap

TL;DR: This article presents bootstrap methods for estimation, using simple arguments, with Minitab macros for implementing these methods, as well as some examples of how these methods could be used for estimation purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer

TL;DR: For women aged 40-49, randomized controlled trials consistently demonstrated no benefit from screening in the first 5-7 years after study entry, and only one trial (Health Insurance Plan) has data beyond 12 years of follow-up, and results showed a 25% decrease in mortality at 10-18 years.
Journal Article

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years

TL;DR: Screening with yearly mammography and physical examination of the breasts detected considerably more node-negative, small tumours than usual care, but it had no impact on the rate of death from breast cancer up to 7 years' follow-up from entry.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Estrogen Replacement Therapy on the Specificity and Sensitivity of Screening Mammography

TL;DR: The specificity of mammographic screening was lower for current users of ERT than for never users or former users, and sensitivity was also lower in women currently receiving ERT.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern.

TL;DR: An increase in mammographic density was demonstrated in most subjects undergoing continuous combined HRT and was most pronounced in subjects with a lower baseline density percentage.
Related Papers (5)