scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

In search of legitimacy: A semiotic analysis of business model disclosure practices

TLDR
In this article, the authors investigate how firms disclose the presentation and content of business model (BM) information in corporate reports to manage their legitimacy in response to European Directive 2014/95, which is used to identify disclosure strategies pursued by firms in reaction to the new regulation.
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate how firms disclose the presentation and content of business model (BM) information in corporate reports to manage their legitimacy in response to European Directive 2014/95.,Legitimacy theory is used to identify disclosure strategies pursued by firms in reaction to the new regulation. To understand how firms adopt these strategic responses, semiotic analysis is applied to a sample of European companies’ reports through Crowther’s (2012) framework, which is based on a mechanism of binary oppositions.,Half of the sample strategically choose to comply with the European Union (EU) Directive regarding BM information through the use of non-accounting language, figures, and diagrams. Other firms did not disclose any substantive information but managed the impression of compliance with the regulation, while the remainder of the sample dismissed the regulation altogether.,This study demonstrates how organisations use the disclosure of BM information in their corporate reports to control their legitimacy. The results support the idea that firms can acquire legitimacy by complying with the law or giving the impression of compliance with the regulation. This study provides evidence on the first-time adoption of the EU Directive, and therefore, future research can enlarge the sample and conduct the analysis over a broader time frame.,A more precise indication of the EU Directive regarding “where” firms should report BM information, “how” the description of a BM should refer to the environmental, social, governance (ESG) factors, and a set of performance measures to track the evolution of a company’s BM overtime is needed.,While there has been a notable amount of research that has applied content analysis methodologies to investigate the thematic and syntactic aspects of BM disclosure in corporate reports, only a few studies have investigated BM disclosures in relation to the EU Directive. Furthermore, the application of semiotic analysis extends beyond traditional content analysis methodologies because it considers the structure of the story at many levels, thus developing a more complete textual picture of how BMs are described, allowing an analysis of the reasons behind the disclosure strategies pursued by firms.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rebuilding trust: sustainability and non-financial reporting and the European Union regulation

TL;DR: In this paper, the concept of accountability within the context of the European Union (EU) Directive on non-financial disclosure (hereafter the EU Directive) is examined and a critique and a novel perspective for future research into mandatory NFR and to advance future practice and policy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-financial key performance indicators: what determines the differences in the quality and quantity of the disclosures?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined if corporate characteristics, general contextual factors and the internal context differentiate the quality and quantity of the disclosed non-financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
Journal ArticleDOI

Environmental, Social, and Governance Integration into the Business Model: Literature Review and Research Agenda

TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) into the currently prevailing business model, using an input-process-output model to identify the integration process and the outcomes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches

TL;DR: This article synthesize the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches, and identify three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based upon normative approval; and cognitive, according to comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategic responses to institutional processes

TL;DR: The authors applied the convergent insights of institutional and resource dependence perspectives to the prediction of strategic responses to institutional processes, and proposed a typology of strategies that vary in active organizational resistance from passive conformity to proactive manipulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research

TL;DR: This article provided a broad and multifaceted review of the received literature on business models in which the authors examined the business model concept through multiple subject-matter lenses and found that scholars do not agree on what a business model is and that the literature is developing largely in silos according to the phenomena of interest of the respective researchers.
Journal Article

Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between disclosure level and the cost of equity capital by regressing firm-specific estimates of cost of capital on market beta, firm size and a self-constructed measure of disclosure level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation

TL;DR: In this article, the role of legitimacy theory in explaining managers' decisions is discussed and it is emphasised that legitimacy theory, as it is currently used, must still be considered to be a relatively underdeveloped theory of managerial behaviour.
Related Papers (5)