scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Influence of the Postcuring Process on Dimensional Accuracy and Seating of 3D-Printed Polymeric Fixed Prostheses.

TLDR
Geometric accuracy of 3D-printed prostheses, marginal gap, internal gap, and intermolar distance was evaluated and the presence of supports during the postcuring process did not make a significant difference.
Abstract
The postcuring process is essential for 3-dimensional (3D) printing of photopolymer-based dental prostheses. However, the deformation of prostheses resulting from the postcuring process has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different postcuring methods on the fit and dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-arch polymeric fixed prostheses. A study stone model with four prosthetic implant abutments was prepared. A full-arch fixed dental prosthesis was designed, and the design was transferred to dental computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software in which supports were designed to the surface of the prosthesis design for 3D printing. Using a biocompatible photopolymer and a stereolithography apparatus 3D printer, polymeric prostheses were produced (N = 21). In postcuring, the printed prostheses were polymerized in three different ways: the prosthesis alone, the prosthesis with supports, or the prosthesis on a stone model. Geometric accuracy of 3D-printed prostheses, marginal gap, internal gap, and intermolar distance was evaluated using microscopy and digital techniques. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction were used for the comparison of results among groups (α = 0.05). In general, the mean marginal and internal gaps of cured prostheses were the smallest when the printed prostheses were cured with seating on the stone model (P < 0.05). With regard to the adaptation accuracy, the presence of supports during the postcuring process did not make a significant difference. Error in the intermolar distance was significantly smaller in the model seating condition than in the other conditions (P < 0.001). Seating 3D-printed prosthesis on the stone model reduces adverse deformation in the postcuring process, thereby enabling the fabrication of prostheses with favorable adaptation.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanical properties of 3D-printed prosthetic materials compared with milled and conventional processing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

TL;DR: In this paper , a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed prosthetic materials compared with subtractive milling manufacture (MM) or conventional techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing: An in vitro study

TL;DR: Interim crowns rinsed for 10 minutes showed high accuracy and the trueness of the external and intaglio surfaces of crowns varied significantly among the different rinsing times, but there was no statistically significant difference in terms of trueness measurements of the marginal surfaces.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accuracy of Fixed Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses Additively Manufactured by Metal, Ceramic, or Polymer: A Systematic Review.

TL;DR: AM implant-supported fixed prostheses demonstrate similar accuracy compared to conventional and computer-aided design and computer’aided manufacturing techniques in vitro.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of postpolymerization conditions on the physical properties, cytotoxicity, and dimensional accuracy of a 3D-printed dental restorative material.

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors assess the physical properties, accuracy, and biosafety of a 3D-printed dental restorative material according to postpolymerization conditions, using a digital light processing 3D printer with 1 interim dental material (C&B MFH).
Journal ArticleDOI

In-house customization of lingual orthodontic brackets using Ubrackets CAD orthodontic software

TL;DR: In this article , the Ubracket CAD software is used to transform trade lingual orthodontic brackets into customized by adding composite to their bases, and the complete lingual bracket customization, indirect bonding tray design, printing, and bonding workflow are presented.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities.

TL;DR: The goal of this review is to connect the various additive manufacturing techniques with the monomeric and polymeric materials they use while highlighting emerging material-based developments.
Journal ArticleDOI

The future of dental devices is digital.

TL;DR: Dental device manufacturing will experience a second revolution when layered fabrication techniques reach the point of being able to produce high quality dental prostheses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a brief discussion about additive manufacturing and also the most employed additive manufacturing technologies for polymers, specifically, properties under different loading types such as tensile, bending, compressive, fatigue, impact and others.
Journal ArticleDOI

Photopolymerization in 3D Printing

TL;DR: The field of 3D printing is continuing its rapid development in both academic and industrial research environments as mentioned in this paper, which offers flexibility over the final properties of the 3D printed materials (such as optical, chemical and mechanical properties) using versatile polymer chemistry.
Journal ArticleDOI

Considerations in measurement of marginal fit

TL;DR: The measurements of misfit at different locations are geometrically related to each other and defined as internal gap, marginal gap, vertical marginal discrepancies, horizontal marginal discrepancy, overextended margin, underextendedmargin, absolute marginal discrepancy and seating discrepancy.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are the most common post-processing steps used in 3D printing for dental model?

The paper does not provide information about the most common post-processing steps used in 3D printing for dental models.