scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Inter- and Transdisciplinary University: A systems approach to education and innovation

Erich Jantsch
- 01 Mar 1970 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 1, pp 403-428
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a transdisciplinary structure for the university is briefly outlined; its main elements are three types of organizational units, which focus on the interdisciplinary coordination between the three pairs of levels in the education/innovation system, i.e., on method and organization rather than on accumulated knowledge.
Abstract
In response to various pressures for change arising from the present situation, the university will have to adopt a new purpose which may be recognized as a means of increasing the capability of society for continuous self-renewal. With this new purpose in mind, the structure of the university will be determined by the concept of an integral education/innovation system for which four principal levels are considered: empirical, pragmatic, normative and purposive levels. From multi-, pluri-, and crossdisciplinary approaches, all pertaining to one systems level only, the university is expected to develop increasingly interdisciplinary approaches, linking two systems levels and coordinating the activities at the lower level from the higher level through common axiomatics. Ultimately, the entire education/innovation system may become coordinated as a multilevel multigoal hierarchical system through a transdisciplinary approach, implying generalized axiomatics and mutual enhancement of disciplinary epistemology. Current university approaches to develop interdisciplinary links between the pragmatic and normative systems levels are discussed. Finally, a transdisciplinary structure for the university is briefly outlined; its main elements are three types of organizational units—systems design laboratories, function-oriented departments, and discipline-oriented departments—which focus on the interdisciplinary coordination between the three pairs of levels in the education/innovation system, i.e., on method and organization rather than on accumulated knowledge. An important role for policy sciences is seen in the linkage between the top pair of systems levels.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Models of Temporal Discounting 1937-2000: An Interdisciplinary Exchange between Economics and Psychology.

TL;DR: This paper describes exchanges from the 1930s onwards, focusing on two episodes in particular: an attempted synthesis by psychiatrist George Ainslie and others in the 1970s; and the attempted application of this new discounting model by a generation of economists and psychologists in the 1980s, which ultimately ended in the diversity of measurements disappointment.

A Close and Distant Reading of Shakespearean Intertextuality

Johannes Molz
TL;DR: In this article, the authors look for salient patterns in Shakespearean intertextuality in a manual, qualitative examination of the complete prose works of 11 authors in a corpus of 14 million words and a second, quantitative reading of digitalised versions of the texts allows for a significant extension of the corpora and a comparison of the methods involved.
Journal ArticleDOI

Digital Threat and Vulnerability Management: The SVIDT Method

Roland W. Scholz
- 05 Apr 2017 - 
TL;DR: The SVIDT method is embedded in the framework of coupled human–environment systems, the theory of risk and vulnerability assessment, types of adaptation (assimilation vs. accommodation), and a comprehensive sustainability evaluation and exemplarily applied to an enterprise for which online gaming has become an essential digital-business field.
Book ChapterDOI

The History of Higher Education

TL;DR: Langewiesche as mentioned in this paper argued that historians should only concern themselves with analyzing the past; assessment of the present is simply not their remit and is best left to the social sciences or even journalism As a futurologist the historian can merely dabble
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are the different types of university structures?

The paper does not explicitly mention the different types of university structures.