scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Is cognitive enhancement harmful? Personal affectation and independent value points of view

Daniel Loewe
- 15 Dec 2017 - 
- Vol. 18, Iss: 3, pp 117-129
TLDR
In this paper, criticas al mejoramiento cognitivo mediante el uso de agentes farmacologicos and las discute desde una perspectiva liberal.
Abstract
El articulo presenta criticas al mejoramiento cognitivo mediante el uso de agentes farmacologicos y las discute desde una perspectiva liberal. Estas criticas apuntan a las consecuencias del mejoramiento cognitivo en terceros y en los agentes, asi como en valores independientes. De acuerdo al articulo estas criticas no son convincentes. Por el contrario, bajo ciertos supuestos se argumenta que hay buenas razones a favor del acceso libre al mejoramiento cognitivo. Palabras claves: mejoramiento cognitivo farmacologico, danos en terceros, danos en el agente, valores independientes, liberalismo.

read more

Citations
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide evidence that intelligence has pervasive utility in work settings because it is essentially the ability to deal with cognitive complexity, in particular, with complex information processing, and the more complex a work task, the greater the advantages that higher g confers in performing it well.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health as a Theoretical Concept

TL;DR: This paper argues that the medical conception of health as absence of disease is a value-free theoretical notion, its main elements are biological function and statistical normality, in contrast to various other ideas prominent in the literature on health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease

TL;DR: It is concluded that, to date, experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated relatively modest overall effects, most probably because of substantial variability in response both across and within individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Normal functioning and the treatment-enhancement distinction.

TL;DR: The treatment-enhancement distinction draws a line between services or interventions meant to prevent or cure (or otherwise ameliorate) conditions that the authors view as diseases or disabilities and interventions that improve a condition that they views as a normal function or feature of members of their species.