scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Fulranumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis Pain: A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Extension Study.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
To evaluate the long‐term safety and efficacy of fulranumab in patients with knee or hip pain caused by moderate‐to‐severe chronic osteoarthritis (OA).
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fulranumab in patients with knee or hip pain caused by moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis (OA). Methods In this phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled extension study, patients who were randomized in equal proportions to receive subcutaneous doses of either placebo or fulranumab (1 mg every 4 weeks, 3 mg every 8 weeks, 3 mg every 4 weeks, 6 mg every 8 weeks, or 10 mg every 8 weeks) in the 12-week double-blind efficacy phase and who completed this double-blind efficacy phase were eligible to continue the dosage throughout a 92-week double-blind extension phase, followed by a 24-week posttreatment follow-up period. Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pre-identified AEs of interest, and joint replacements. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline to the end of the double-blind extension phase in scores on the patient's global assessment and the pain and physical function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Results Overall, 401 of the 423 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind efficacy phase entered the extension study. Long-term sustained improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters following fulranumab treatment (1 mg every 4 weeks, 3 mg every 4 weeks, and 10 mg every 8 weeks) as compared with placebo. Similar percentages of patients in both groups experienced TEAEs (88% taking placebo and 91% taking fulranumab; all phases). Across all fulranumab groups, arthralgia (21%) and OA (18%) (e.g., exacerbation of OA pain) were the most common TEAEs. The most common serious TEAEs were the requirement for knee (10%) and hip (7%) arthroplasty, with 80% occurring during the posttreatment follow-up period. Neurologic-related TEAEs (28%; all phases) were generally mild-to-moderate. Overall, 81 joint replacements were performed in 71 patients (8 [11%] receiving placebo and 63 [89%] receiving fulranumab); 15 patients (21%) had rapid progression of OA (RPOA). All cases of RPOA occurred in fulranumab-treated patients who were concurrently receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and occurred in joints with preexisting OA. Conclusion Long-term treatment with fulranumab was generally well-tolerated and efficacious. RPOA was observed as a safety signal. Future studies are warranted to demonstrate whether the risk of RPOA can be reduced in patients taking fulranumab.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of hip and knee OA is presented, focusing on the most common reason for activity limitation in adults. But, the authors do not discuss the treatment of OA in the context of total joint replacement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond TNF: TNF superfamily cytokines as targets for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.

TL;DR: Additional members of the TNF superfamily that could be relevant for the pathogenesis of rheumatic disease are focused on, including those that can strongly promote activity of immune cells or increase activity of tissue cells, as well as those that promote death pathways and might limit inflammation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The evolution of nerve growth factor inhibition in clinical medicine.

TL;DR: Anti-NGF antibody treatments, if approved, should reduce pain and improve quality of life for individuals with knee and hip OA; however, safety monitoring programmes will be necessary.
Journal ArticleDOI

Peripheral pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis.

TL;DR: How molecular and pathological tissue change relates to joint pain in OA will be discussed and a model for how tissue damage may lead to pain over the disease course will be proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigational drugs for the treatment of osteoarthritis, an update on recent developments.

TL;DR: There is no miracle drug that can be used for all OA patients’; treatment and disease stage is crucial for the effectiveness of drugs, so the development of investigational drugs targeting at symptoms and disease progression of OA is expedited.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions

TL;DR: The burden of four major musculoskeletal conditions: osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain, which affects nearly everyone at some point in time and about 4-33% of the population at any given point is described.
Journal ArticleDOI

EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)

TL;DR: In this paper, a multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 16 rheumatologists, one physiatrist, one orthopaedic surgeon, two allied health professionals, and one evidence-based medicine expert, representing 15 different European countries, contributed up to 10 propositions describing key clinical points for management of hand OA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care

TL;DR: Knee osteoarthritis sufficiently severe to consider joint replacement represents a minority of all knee pain and disability suffered by older people and healthcare provision in primary care needs to focus on this broader group to impact on community levels of pain and Disability.
Related Papers (5)