scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Measures of Discrimination Skill in Probabilistic Judgment

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors focus on a normative concept of probabilistic accuracy that they call discrimination and present a measure of a judge's discrimination skill, which can be interpreted as the percentage of variance accounted for by the judge and it is unbiased.
Abstract
People's ability to assess probabilities of various events has been the topic of much interest in the areas of judgment, prediction, decision making, and memory. The evaluation of probabilistic judgments, however, raises interesting logical questions as to what it means to be a"good" judge. In this article, we focus on a normative concept of probabilistic accuracy that we call discrimination and present a measure of a judge's discrimination skill. This measure builds on an earlier index (Murphy, 1973) and has the advantages that (a) it can be interpreted as the percentage of variance accounted for by the judge and (b) it is unbiased. By way of deriving this new discrimination measure, we also show that it is related to Pearson's chi-square statistic, a result which may be useful in the future development of hypothesis testing and estimation procedures.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning

TL;DR: In this article, a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning (JOLs) is outlined, distinguishing three types of cues for JOLs: intrinsic, extrinsic, and mnemonic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy

TL;DR: In this paper, a theoretical framework addressing the strategic regulation of memory reporting is put forward that delineates the mediating role of metamemorial monitoring and control processes, and a general methodology is proposed that incorporates these processes into the assessment of memory-accuracy and memory-quantity performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined all three questions within a unified model, with the aim of demystifying the feeling-of-knowing (FOK) phenomenon and showed that the computation of FOK is parasitic on the processes involved in attempting to retrieve the target, relying on the accessibility of pertinent information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual differences in rational thought.

TL;DR: This paper explored the extent to which measures of cognitive ability and thinking dispositions can predict discrepancies from normative responding on a variety of tasks from the heuristics and biases literature including the selection task, belief bias in syllogistic reasoning, argument evaluation, base-rate use, covariation detection, hypothesis testing, outcome bias, if-only thinking, knowledge calibration, hindsight bias, and the false consensus paradigm.
Journal ArticleDOI

How to measure metacognition

TL;DR: Other measures based on signal detection theory and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis that are “bias free,” are reviewed, and these quantities are related to the calibration and discrimination measures developed in the probability estimation literature.
References
More filters
Book

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

TL;DR: The authors described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available.
Book

Statistical methods

Book

Statistical Methods for Psychology

TL;DR: The Statistical Methods for Psychology as discussed by the authors survey statistical techniques commonly used in the behavioral and social sciences, especially psychology and education, and is suitable for either a one-term or a full-year course, and has been used successfully for both.
Related Papers (5)