Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety I
read more
Citations
The geometry of moduli spaces of sheaves
Vertex Algebras and Algebraic Curves
Stability conditions on $K3$ surfaces
A holomorphic Casson invariant for Calabi-Yau 3-folds, and bundles on $K3$ fibrations
References
Real and complex analysis
Geometric Invariant Theory
The self-duality equations on a riemann surface
Anti Self‐Dual Yang‐Mills Connections Over Complex Algebraic Surfaces and Stable Vector Bundles
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. What is the maximum norm of a holomorphic matrix?
The maximum norm of an eigenvalue of a holomorphic matrix is a subharmonic function, so the eigenforms of <p^ are uniformly bounded in C°.
Q3. What is the property of being a universal categorical quotient?
The property of being a universal categorical quotient is preserved under taking the product with another space, as well as localization in the quotient space (hence by localization in S^), so M^(X,,^) x S^ is a universal categorical quotient of R^(X,, ^{s), n) X S .̂
Q4. What is the morphism of Higgs bundles?
Suppose X is smooth and projective over S. A Higgs bundle E on X (flat over S) is of semiharmonic type if the restrictions to the fibers E, are semistable Higgs bundles with vanishing rational Chern classes.
Q5. What is the construction of P i->pp?
The construction P i-> pp provides an equivalence between the categories of principal bundles with integrable relative connection, and strict exact faithful tensor functors p from Rep(G) to the category of vector bundles with relative integrable connection.
Q6. What is the reason why C" acts functorially on the Hilbert schemes?
This is because the authors constructed Mpoi(X, n) as the moduli space of some sheaves on the cotangent bundle to X, and the action ofC* came from the action of multiplication on T* X, so C" acts functorially on the Hilbert schemes, the Grassmanians, and the line bundles over the Grassmanians.
Q7. What is the inverse image of a connected component in Mg(X, n?
But the inverse image of a connected component in Mg(X, n), is connected in Ra(X, 72), since M^(X, n) is a universal categorical quotient of Rfi(X, n} by a connected group.
Q8. What is the construction of the quotient sheaves of Higgs?
If F is such a quotient, then for any s e S' the fiber Fg == F L' is a quotient Higgs sheaf of Eg = E|^ with normalized Hilbert polynomial equal to that of Eg. Let Kg denote the kernel of Eg -> Fg. Then Kg is a sub-Higgs sheaf of Eg with the same normalized Hilbert polynomial.
Q9. What is the definition of harmonic metric for a flat bundle?
There is a notion of harmonic metric for a vector bundle with integrable connection (flat bundle) or a Higgs bundle on a smooth projective variety X. Given a flat bundle and a harmonic metric, one obtains a Higgs bundle, and vice versa.
Q10. What is the trivialization of the representation spaces?
In order to show that the associated trivializations of analytic spaces agree with the trivializationsRB^X/S, ̂ n) == S x R^(X,, i;(.), „) and M^X/S, ^) = S x M^(X,, n),it suffices to treat the cases of the representation spaces, since the maps R(X/S, S, n) -> M(X/S, n) are universally submersive.
Q11. What is the inverse limit of a system of locally constant sheaves?
II 27Finally, the authors have G = Hm G\\and since Y' is locally simply connected, the inverse limit of a system of locally constant sheaves is again locally constant.